On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:29:20 -0600, Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> 4% $Get_Root make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
> Manoj - I've switched from "--revision=" to "--append-to-version"
> because new kernels of the same version don't clash module
> d
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:16:15 -0400, Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj, btw, as an insider, how broken is sid as of now?
I run Sid, and the breakage due to C++ transition seems to be
mostly behind me -- but I never was much out of sync. Upgrades from
Sarge may still be
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
4% $Get_Root make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
Manoj - I've switched from "--revision=" to "--append-to-version"
because new kernels of the same version don't clash module directories.
It seems much better to me. Do you still prefer "--revision" for some
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:15:15PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If this is ridiculously complex, umm. are you sure you want to
> be running Sid?
>
> manoj
Manoj, btw, as an insider, how broken is sid as of now?
I'm waiting for some unstable stability before I go back to i
It seems that there is no lack of Documentation and Good Support for those wishing to fiddle with their Kernels: Specifically, create a Kernel-Image.However, I no longer have this problem: I discovered that Debian has simply changed the name of the Kernel-Images to Linux-Images.
Mystery Solved and
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 21:15, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:05:47 -0400, David R Litwin
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
> > Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing
> > that. It seem
If this is ridiculously complex, umm. are you sure you want to be running Sid?
A good question: Allow me to answer: (In no particular order)I want all the latest, most up-to-date soft-ware.If ever I can help report bugs (which I have been known to do) then that is a nice thing to do.
One of the re
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:05:47 -0400, David R Litwin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
> Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing
> that. It seems ridiculously elaborate.
Phase ONE: Getting and configuring the ke
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:05:47AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
> Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing that.
> It seems ridiculously elaborate.
Well if you aren't fussed about fine-tuning the configura
On 16/08/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I apt-get install arts, it want libarts1c2 which wants libqt3-mt
> which deletes 244 packages (KDE). Now, I know that the Debian
> developers are changing KDE to be c++ oriented (or some thing like
> that) and are changing the packages
> I see in another posting that you solved your problem. But to address
> the above see this documentation. Because really it is not that hard
> and the kenrel-package makes this all quite easy.
>
> http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
Yes, it has been mostly solved (though
David R. Litwin wrote:
> I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
> Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing that.
> It seems ridiculously elaborate.
I see in another posting that you solved your problem. But to address
the above see this documenta
> kernel-image was renamed to linux-kernel to accommodate for hurd and
> other kernels in near future.
So it was! That would explain why when I searched in the Packages I
found linux-kernel and not kernel-image.
I thank you kindly!
I will try to dpkg -i and hopefully all shall go well.
I read entirely through the Creating Custom Kernels with Debian's
Kernel-Package System and I don't think I really feel like doing that.
It seems ridiculously elaborate.
So, let's try this again.
I still have the problem I wrote of (namely udev needing a 2.6.12
kernel and I have only a 2.6.11 ker
David R. Litwin wrote:
> My problem is (possibly) three-fold:
>
> I dist-upgraded to Sid a few hours ago and haven't fully installed it
> because udev can not be installed with the 2.6.11 kernel. So, I need
> the 2.6.12 kernel, but it isn't a kernel-image. So, I must make one
> myself, which I am
My problem is (possibly) three-fold:
I dist-upgraded to Sid a few hours ago and haven't fully installed it
because udev can not be installed with the 2.6.11 kernel. So, I need
the 2.6.12 kernel, but it isn't a kernel-image. So, I must make one
myself, which I am quite willing to do.
However, apt-
16 matches
Mail list logo
