From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen)
> I don't see how that can possibly coexist with this sentence of the
> GPL, section 7:
>
> : if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of
> : the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly
> : through you, then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> From: James Antill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From Bruce:
>> > The code that makes use of
>> > the patented principle must be under the MIT license, which allows a
>> > scope-limited patent license. That may be linked into GPL code and
>> > distributed.
>>
>>
From: Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you have any reason to think that the position you defend will
> satisfy Patent holders ?
Some of them have threatened to walk off of W3C in response to even so
mild a position as the draft policy. Nobody thinks they'll really do it.
But your question
3 matches
Mail list logo
