On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:53:01 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:48:51 + (UTC) To keep things as simple as
> possible, instead PNG (or SVG) I would go for a GIF image ...
>
> Open source people usually recommend PNG rather than JPG. Yours is the
> the first r
From: Camaleon
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:48:51 + (UTC)
To keep things as simple as possible, instead PNG (or SVG) I would go for
a GIF image ...
Open source people usually recommend PNG rather than JPG.
Yours is the the first recommendation for GIF.
Thanks, ... Peter E.
--
1
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:48:41 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 + (UTC)
>> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the tag for
>> displaying images in html?
>
> Used in many places. In this instance I became so
> preoccupied with trans
From: Linux-Fan
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:52:08 +0200
> The command rsvg [source] [destination] easily converts SVG to PNG.
I used rsvg to recreate the PNG image and it appears identical to the
image made by convert a few days back. The same artifacts are present.
http://members.shaw.ca/pe
On 08/17/2012 08:48 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 + (UTC)
>> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the
>> tag for displaying images in html?
>
> Used in many places. In this instance
> I became so preoccupied with transfor
From: Camaleon
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 + (UTC)
> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the
> tag for displaying images in html?
Used in many places. In this instance
I became so preoccupied with transforming the example
to my case, that didn't cross my mind.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:47:30 -0800, peasthope wrote:
>> Why?
>
> My first Google search turned up the example in the w3.org page cited in
> the original query.
I see... but you really mean you were not aware that there existed the
tag for displaying images in html?
>> Don't you like the tag?
From: Camaleon
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:49:24 + (UTC)
> Why?
My first Google search turned up the example in the w3.org
page cited in the original query.
> Don't you like the tag? :-?
So many choices. Will try .
> you mean the image at the bottom ("Product Diagrams")?
Correct.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:21:58 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> At the end of this section is an example illustrating inline data in an
> HTML file.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-13.3.1
Yes, the tag is mainly used for uncommon elements.
> Here I tried to use that idea to include
From: Manuel Cremer
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:38:20 +0200
> Although I do not know why this should be debian-related, ...
True enough, it isn't. At the time there seemed a small
chance it was an iceweasel problem and in any case, many
sharp people read this list.
> it must be
> type="img/
On 08/15/2012 10:21 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> At the end of this section is an example illustrating
> inline data in an HTML file.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-13.3.1
>
> Here I tried to use that idea to include a png image.
>
> http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Cate
At the end of this section is an example illustrating
inline data in an HTML file.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-13.3.1
Here I tried to use that idea to include a png image.
http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.html#Product0x0Test0
Iceweasel 14.0.1 displays the caption
12 matches
Mail list logo
