Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-08 Thread tomas
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 07:33:20AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Ah.. that world is called DOS. > > It's usually spelled "DoS", tho. :-D Thank you! You just made three unicorns alive. Do you hear them niighing? Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-08 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Ah.. that world is called DOS. It's usually spelled "DoS", tho. Stefan

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Pocket
On 11/7/23 15:54, Karen Lewellen wrote: On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Dan Ritter wrote: Karen Lewellen wrote: Rather than get banned by supplying some of the options that while physically capable of using Linux, might not be age appropriate, I am wondering if the focus is on the business definition of

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Karen Lewellen
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:23 PM Charles Curley wrote: On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 20:42:42 +0100 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: IT'S A CONSPIRACY! UNICORNS AREN'T REAL!!! Nonsense. They certainly can exist. (I am not aware of any extant as I write this.) And Otter

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread John Hasler
to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > IT'S A CONSPIRACY! UNICORNS AREN'T REAL!!! Of course they are real. It's virgins (the only people who can see them) that don't exist. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-11-07): > (note how that one stops short of saying "character special file"? $ file prog/ffmpeg/libavfilter/buffersrc.h prog/ffmpeg/libavfilter/buffersrc.h: C source, ASCII text Do you think this is not a file? Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: P

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:23 PM Charles Curley wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 20:42:42 +0100 > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > IT'S A CONSPIRACY! UNICORNS AREN'T REAL!!! > > Nonsense. They certainly can exist. (I am not aware of any extant as > I write this.) And Otter Zell has the patent on the proce

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 20:42:42 +0100 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > IT'S A CONSPIRACY! UNICORNS AREN'T REAL!!! Nonsense. They certainly can exist. (I am not aware of any extant as I write this.) And Otter Zell has the patent on the process for creating them. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? h

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread John Hasler
Dan Ritter wrote: > No, we're just riffing about the lack of a fantastical magical > world in which everything works consistently. Karen Lewellen wrote: > Ah.. that world is called DOS. Well, a resident monitor is a lot easier to make consistent than an operating system. -- John Hasler j...@sug

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Karen Lewellen
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Dan Ritter wrote: Karen Lewellen wrote: Rather than get banned by supplying some of the options that while physically capable of using Linux, might not be age appropriate, I am wondering if the focus is on the business definition of the term? No, we're just riffing about t

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Dan Ritter
Karen Lewellen wrote: > Rather than get banned by supplying some of the options that while > physically capable of using Linux, might not be age appropriate, I am > wondering if the focus is on the business definition of the term? No, we're just riffing about the lack of a fantastical magical wor

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread gene heskett
On 11/7/23 10:52, John Hasler wrote: I wrote: On System III directories were files. Nicolas George writes: On Linux, directories are files. Try to edit one. That is a permissions based limit toay, and I have done that thousands of times on os9. On System III the same system calls oper

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Karen Lewellen
ahem, (lifts late hand from back of room) When I read the subject line, I admit to being somewhat confused. So..searched for Unicorn, in case a new meaning existed that would explain it. Rather than get banned by supplying some of the options that while physically capable of using Linux, might n

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread gene heskett
On 11/7/23 09:29, John Hasler wrote: Paul Duncan writes: Yes, but we (on Linux and I *think* on good old System V and BSD 4.3) have mkfile and mkdir - so surely that means that everything (stored on a bit of rotating rust) is *not* a file :-) On System III directories were files. And always

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread tomas
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:40:43PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de (12023-11-07): > > "/dev/zero is not a file" > > It is lying. tomas@trotzki:~$ file /dev/zero /dev/zero: character special (1/5) (note how that one stops short of saying "character special file"? IT'S A CONSPIRACY

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-11-07): > "/dev/zero is not a file" It is lying. Regarde, -- Nicolas George

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Nicolas George
David Wright (12023-11-07): > in white on a red background. I'm not sure what that's meant to demonstrate. It proves nothing, either for a directory or for a device. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread tomas
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 12:38:37PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > > I wrote: > > > On System III directories were files. > > > > Nicolas George writes: > > > On Linux, directories are files. > > > > Try to edit one. > > vim does that, sure. "/dev/zero is not a file" Same for

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread tomas
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 12:58:20PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 07 Nov 2023 at 17:03:14 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote: > > John Hasler (12023-11-07): > > > Try to edit one. > > > > Try to edit /dev/zero. > > $ nano /dev/zero > > [ "/dev/zero" is a device file ] > > in white on a red

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread David Wright
On Tue 07 Nov 2023 at 17:03:14 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote: > John Hasler (12023-11-07): > > Try to edit one. > > Try to edit /dev/zero. $ nano /dev/zero [ "/dev/zero" is a device file ] in white on a red background. I'm not sure what that's meant to demonstrate. Cheers, David.

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Dan Ritter
John Hasler wrote: > I wrote: > > On System III directories were files. > > Nicolas George writes: > > On Linux, directories are files. > > Try to edit one. vim does that, sure. -dsr-

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Pocket
On 11/7/23 11:03, Nicolas George wrote: John Hasler (12023-11-07): Try to edit one. Try to edit /dev/zero. I once edited /dev/null ;} -- It's not easy to be me

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Nicolas George
John Hasler (12023-11-07): > Try to edit one. Try to edit /dev/zero. -- Nicolas George

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > On System III directories were files. Nicolas George writes: > On Linux, directories are files. Try to edit one. On System III the same system calls operated on files and directories. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread Nicolas George
John Hasler (12023-11-07): > On System III directories were files. On Linux, directories are files. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux

2023-11-07 Thread John Hasler
Paul Duncan writes: > Yes, but we (on Linux and I *think* on good old System V and BSD 4.3) > have mkfile and mkdir - so surely that means that everything (stored > on a bit of rotating rust) is *not* a file :-) On System III directories were files. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI U

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux (was: How to compare contents of two folders against third one?)

2023-11-07 Thread Paul Duncan
Okay, I'm gonna throw a bit more fuel onto this fire :-) On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 15:58, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > If you ask folks like Brian Kernighan and Rob Pike, they will tell you > all the unicorns are dead on Linux because everything is _not_ a file. > The only safe harbor

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux (was: How to compare contents of two folders against third one?)

2023-11-03 Thread Nicolas George
Jeffrey Walton (12023-11-03): > If you ask folks like Brian Kernighan and Rob Pike, they will tell you > all the unicorns are dead on Linux because everything is _not_ a file. They might tell you that, but that is wrong nonetheless: they fumbled the “everything is a file” from the star

Re: All the unicorns are dead on Linux (was: How to compare contents of two folders against third one?)

2023-11-03 Thread tomas
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:57:59AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:56 PM wrote: [...] > > I concur with Nicolas: every time you say "folder", a unicorn dies. > > If you ask folks like Brian Kernighan and Rob Pike, they will tell you > all th

All the unicorns are dead on Linux (was: How to compare contents of two folders against third one?)

2023-11-03 Thread Jeffrey Walton
;/destination-folder-one/" and > > "/destination-folder-two/" against a "/source-folder/" to show if there is > > anything that was left out? > > I concur with Nicolas: every time you say "folder", a unicorn dies. If you ask folks like Brian Ke