On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:53:31AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2024 13:08:56 -0400
> Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> > There is a colon in my aliases file. I just omitted it in the email.
>
> Don't do that. Always use copy and paste to convey the contents
On Fri, 24 May 2024 13:08:56 -0400
Paul M Foster wrote:
> There is a colon in my aliases file. I just omitted it in the email.
Don't do that. Always use copy and paste to convey the contents of a
configuration file. Murphy only know what else you inadvertently left
out or added.
it to scan
> through aliases, but only on local delivery, not if the email is outbound.
>
> So does anyone know how to make OpenSMTPD do alias conversions on outbound
> mail? Or alternatively, is there a way to hack Debian so that mails
> generated from root processes to go an offsite email
ckaroo, it
> > > arrives. That means this config can do what it's designed to do,
> > > basically.
> > > However, mails to "root" on buckaroo don't get to yosemite. They should,
> > > because my /etc/aliases table looks like this:
> > >
end an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan from buckaroo, it
> > > arrives. That means this config can do what it's designed to do,
> > > basically.
> > > However, mails to "root" on buckaroo don't get to yosemite. They should,
> > > because
g can do what it's designed to do, basically.
> > However, mails to "root" on buckaroo don't get to yosemite. They should,
> > because my /etc/aliases table looks like this:
> >
> > ---
> > ...
> > rootpa...@yosemite.mars.lan
> > ---
karoo don't get to yosemite. They should,
> because my /etc/aliases table looks like this:
>
> ---
> ...
> rootpa...@yosemite.mars.lan
> ---
Still out of my depth with OpenSMTPD, but... good ol' aliases,of sendmail
lore would have a colon after the "root" up t
ore information.
table aliases file:/etc/aliases
table secrets file:/etc/secrets
listen on localhost
action "relay" relay host smtp+notls://@yosemite.mars.lan:25 auth
match from local for any action "relay"
---
If I send an email directly to pa...@yosemite.mars.lan from bu
On 02/26/2022 02:54 PM, Erwan David wrote:
Le 26/02/2022 à 20:48, Stephen P. Molnar a écrit :
On 02/26/2022 02:35 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 02:23:04PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Without any sort of warning as the user, I can no longer use
aliases, nor the normal
Le 26/02/2022 à 20:48, Stephen P. Molnar a écrit :
On 02/26/2022 02:35 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 02:23:04PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Without any sort of warning as the user, I can no longer use
aliases, nor the normal bash commands on th xfce4-terminal. Root is
On 02/26/2022 02:35 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 02:23:04PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Without any sort of warning as the user, I can no longer use aliases,
nor the normal bash commands on th xfce4-terminal. Root is still
working without problems.
Show us. Paste a
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 02:23:04PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Without any sort of warning as the user, I can no longer use aliases, nor
> the normal bash commands on th xfce4-terminal. Root is still working without
> problems.
Show us. Paste a SESSION from your TERMINAL into the
I have just installed Bullseye on a different drive on my main Linux
platform. No problems ere encountered and the system booted normally,
both as root and as a user (comp).
Without any sort of warning as the user, I can no longer use aliases,
nor the normal bash commands on th xfce4
ly
correct: it is *NOT* fine. That is not how you do it.
https://mywiki.wooledge.org/DotFiles
https://wiki.debian.org/DotFiles
You put aliases in ~/.bashrc so that they are read by NON-LOGIN SHELLS
such as the one you get when you open an xterm from a window manager,
and that xterm is NOT invok
On 12/16/2019 08:30 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 04:27:39AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I find that I have to source the .bashrc use the aliases.
My guess is that you:
1) created a ~/.bash_profile and forgot to tell it to source ~/.bashrc; or
2) altered your
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 04:27:39AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I find that I have to source the .bashrc use the aliases.
My guess is that you:
1) created a ~/.bash_profile and forgot to tell it to source ~/.bashrc; or
2) altered your ~/.profile in such a way that it no longer sour
On Sb, 14 dec 19, 04:27:39, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> For reasons unknown to me, my user seems to have forgotten aliases in
> .bashrc!
>
> I find that I have to source the .bashrc use the aliases. This is rather
> inconvenient as I have quite a few aliases that I use all of the
For reasons unknown to me, my user seems to have forgotten aliases in
.bashrc!
I find that I have to source the .bashrc use the aliases. This is rather
inconvenient as I have quite a few aliases that I use all of the time.
Does anyone haw any idea as to what might be going on here?
Thanks in
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:32:09PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Greg Wooledge writes:
>> > Once more, from the top:
>> >
>> > 1) ~/.bash_profile should source ~/.bashrc
>> > 2) Shell functions and aliases and shopts and set
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:32:09PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
> > Once more, from the top:
> >
> > 1) ~/.bash_profile should source ~/.bashrc
> > 2) Shell functions and aliases and shopts and sets and other transient
> >sett
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:43:25PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> According to what you say, I solved my problem by putting my aliases in
>> ~/.bash_profile rather than in ~/.bash_aliases. I don't know if it's
>> correct, but it works.
>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:43:25PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> According to what you say, I solved my problem by putting my aliases in
> ~/.bash_profile rather than in ~/.bash_aliases. I don't know if it's correct,
> but it works.
It's not correct, because that file
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:06:24PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> I settle down permamnent bash aliases by simply putting them in the file
>> ~/.bash_aliases; but they only work within X environment. Is it possible,
>> and how?, to make them wo
als with
the "-ls" or equivalent option, which forces a login shell. This is
common in academic environments, for example. I think the rationale is
that it makes life simpler for non-sophisticated users, who will just
put their aliases in whatever dot file they happen to stumble across;
forcin
within an X session, you *typically*
> get a non-login shell, which reads ~/.bashrc only.
.
Interesting. Which WM(s)/DE(s) do/does that apply to? 'alias | wc -l' produces
same result here whether in vtty or in Konsole, whether root (53) or ordinary
user (22), my self-created aliases are all
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:06:24PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> I settle down permamnent bash aliases by simply putting them in the file
> ~/.bash_aliases; but they only work within X environment. Is it possible, and
> how?, to make them work also in tty1, tty2, ..., i.e. out of
Hi all.
I settle down permamnent bash aliases by simply putting them in the file
~/.bash_aliases; but they only work within X environment. Is it possible, and
how?, to make them work also in tty1, tty2, ..., i.e. out of graphical
surround?
Thanks for any help,
Rodolfo
Daniel Pocock:
> Do any of the mailers (postfix, exim, etc) provide a convenient way
> to exclude delivery to system accounts by default, or to exclude
> these aliases and accounts from receiving mail from external senders?
> Could anybody share examples of how they do it or pointe
ore, IIRC, and was ignored. There's also a potential
> DoS situation because the default configuration will accept and store mail
> for some aliases in /var/mail/, which might be / and could fill up
> without the admin noticing, especially if legitimate users have mail moved
> elsewher
ause the default configuration will accept and store mail
for some aliases in /var/mail/, which might be / and could fill up
without the admin noticing, especially if legitimate users have mail moved
elsewhere (e.g. ~/Maildir)
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄
On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 20:15:02 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> When people install Debian (or any distro), they usually get a bunch of
> entries in /etc/aliases and various system accounts (/etc/passwd entries
> with UID < 1000) created by the packages they install.
>
> I've
When people install Debian (or any distro), they usually get a bunch of
entries in /etc/aliases and various system accounts (/etc/passwd entries
with UID < 1000) created by the packages they install.
I've noticed an increase in spammers targeting some of the more common ones.
Can the n
do you change the
mailname?
> BUT this breaks the aliases file. "special" or system users, like
> root, are not rewritten to m...@generaldomain.com, they are smarthosted
> with their original user id --> r...@generaldomain.com ...
What is in your aliases files? In which way
com instead of
> themachineshostname.generaldomain.com, all users' mail get delivered to
> u...@generaldomain.com (I create users with usernames that exist as a
> mail alias/address in that domain). BUT
> this breaks the aliases file. "special" or system users, like root, are
> not rewritten to m...@
vered
to u...@generaldomain.com (I create users with usernames that exist as
a mail alias/address in that domain).
BUT
this breaks the aliases file. "special" or system users, like root,
are not rewritten to m...@generaldomain.com, they are smarthosted with
their original user id -->
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Syntax highlighting in Emacs' shell-script-mode leaves much to be
> desired, so this is not really a bad sign. Does it work if you leave
> out the apostrophes?
>
It worked anyway. But emacs confused me. Sorry!
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be
Alexander Batischev wrote:
> Small note about highlighting — if you add quotes, emacs (and vim, and
> any other editor with syntax highlighting as well) thinks that it's a
> string and highlight it. If alias name isn't highlighted that doesn't
> mean that it won't work. So don't think about highlig
Small note about highlighting — if you add quotes, emacs (and vim, and
any other editor with syntax highlighting as well) thinks that it's a
string and highlight it. If alias name isn't highlighted that doesn't
mean that it won't work. So don't think about highlighting —
everything works ;)
Since
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 07:31:28PM +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I would like to define an alias with some `-' characters into it, in my
> .bashrc. For example, if `this-is-my-alias' is my alias, I would use
>
> ==
> alias 'this-is-my-alias'='some command to achieve'
> ==
Hello,
It does work he
On 6 May 2010 20:31, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> It simply does not work. Why? I tried without `'' but emacs then stops
> highlighting the word, which is no good sign. Thanks.
Don't mind about highlighting — alias defined in away like that:
$ alias hello-world="echo 'hello world'"
will work. Tested
On 2010-05-06 19:31 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I would like to define an alias with some `-' characters into it, in my
> .bashrc. For example, if `this-is-my-alias' is my alias, I would use
>
> ==
> alias 'this-is-my-alias'='some command to achieve'
> ==
>
> It simply does not work. Why?
Don'
Hi,
I would like to define an alias with some `-' characters into it, in my
.bashrc. For example, if `this-is-my-alias' is my alias, I would use
==
alias 'this-is-my-alias'='some command to achieve'
==
It simply does not work. Why? I tried without `'' but emacs then stops
highlighting the word,
I just set up a mail server with exim4 and courier imap. I'm using
exim4-heavy. Everything is working as it should /except/ aliases. I
have all of the aliases added to my /etc/aliases file. However, when I
try to send mail to an alias I get the following ndr (Note: I sent the
test me
Kent West wrote:
According to "man ksh":
The following aliases are compiled into the shell but can be unset or
redefined:
Oh, one of those... Thanks for reading the man page for :-)
But it didn't use to be like that; I suppose I can live with them, since
I never use them a
agou wrote:
> I have installed the latest stable debian (AMD64) not long ago, and I
> am baffled, to say the least by a thing - normally, one of the first
> things I do after installing Linux is to hunt down all the "helpful"
> aliases that are set up in /etc/profile, ~/.p
I have installed the latest stable debian (AMD64) not long ago, and I am
baffled, to say the least by a thing - normally, one of the first things
I do after installing Linux is to hunt down all the "helpful" aliases
that are set up in /etc/profile, ~/.profile, /etc/profile.d etc etc (
On Feb 23, 5:00 pm, Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, I solved the issue by installing the ROX file manage. And may I say
> a beautiful application. Then I simply create a simpling to ~/apps for the
> apps that I need and right click on it to and choose "Set Icon..."
>
>
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 07:37:57AM -0800, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> On Feb 23, 12:40 am, Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I guess I use the "ln" command right? And also how do I change icons for
> > these apps? I will probably set up a lightweight WM for them, something
> > l
> If you are going the fluxbox route, why not just configure keys, like,
> e.g., Ctrl-Alt-f starts Firefox, etc?
>
> If you want icons on a lightweight window manager, I think idesk is
> what people use. I personally just configure key commands.
>
> http://fluxbox-wiki.org/index.php/Howto_idesk
On Feb 23, 12:40 am, Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I use the "ln" command right? And also how do I change icons for
> these apps? I will probably set up a lightweight WM for them, something like
> fluxbox or DWM. So how is changing icons in Linux done?
>
If you are goi
Hey guys,
Recently moved from Mac OS X to Debian Etch and I was curios as to how to
create aliases/shortcuts to programs.
I wanted to set up Debian etch for my parents and in their home folder there is
going to be a folder called apps. In there will be all the aliases/shortcuts
for programs
Am 2008-01-26 16:48:18, schrieb T o n g:
> Here is the full OP -- let me try for the last time:
???
> An advanced bash alias expansion question --
> How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
>
> I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
&g
Am 2008-01-26 17:19:04, schrieb Daniel Dickinson:
> and other-script.sh has
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> source ~/.bashrc
this is not needed, since the script is non-interactive
and source ~/.bashrc automaticaly
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:48:00PM +0100, Александър Л. Димитров wrote:
> to be able to handle your daily work quicker. Aliases shouldn't be used in
> shellscripts because:
>
> a) it makes them more difficult to understand (aliases often have very
> unintuitive names) fo
> Probably better would be to move the function/alias
> definitions into a .bash_functions file, source
> that from .bashrc and from any scripts that want
> the functions and aliases.
I think alias definitions should best live in their own file and be sourced from
.${SHELL}rc. This way you
Quoth T o n g:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:12:56 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> >> I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
> >
> > Yes I have. Use functions. Don't use aliases.
>
> Despite its limitations, why one can't use a
On 27 Jan 2008, at 14:08, T o n g wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:40:02 +, William Pursell wrote:
An advanced bash alias expansion question --
How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
PS. I even tried the following but it didn't work either:
$ bash -O expand_al
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:23:10PM +, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:59:35 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > Instead of complaining pointlessly, maybe you could have said
> > something like: . . .
>
> Sorry about my attitude, I was very disappointed that I carefully wrote
> t
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:23:10 + (UTC)
T o n g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:59:35 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
> > No. I don't want to go back into my archive of 20,000 d-u posts and
> > find your OP and read it in close detail now that we are several
> > l
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:59:35 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Instead of complaining pointlessly, maybe you could have said
> something like: . . .
Sorry about my attitude, I was very disappointed that I carefully wrote
the OP but nobody *seems* to read it carefully.
Thanks again to *anyon
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:40:02 +, William Pursell wrote:
>> An advanced bash alias expansion question --
>> How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
>
>> PS. I even tried the following but it didn't work either:
>>
>> $ bash -O expand
T o n g wrote:
An advanced bash alias expansion question --
How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
PS. I even tried the following but it didn't work either:
$ bash -O expand_aliases -c '. ~/.bashrc; (rd /tmp/ttt; alias rd; dt bin;
type dt)'
The point
T o n g wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:47:15 -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
An advanced bash alias expansion question --
How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
PS. I even tried the following but it didn't work either:
$ bash -O expand_aliases -c '. ~/.bashrc; (r
sorry I wasted your time.
You know those of us who voluntarily help out here are just that,
volunteers. We do it because we like to help and because we enjoy
problem solving. But, speaking for myself, I really only like to help
those who help us help them.
All you have done is post a question
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:40:12 + (UTC)
T o n g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:32:57 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >> >> I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
> >> >
> >> > source ~/.bashrc
> >>
> >> Guess that I am having bad lucks
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:12:56 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
>
> Yes I have. Use functions. Don't use aliases.
Despite its limitations, why one can't use aliases in scripts?
This sounds like "Don&
se already defined functions/aliases in a
> shell script.
Thanks a thousand Daniel!!! Finally! there is someone who really read my
post and try to understand it before jumping to conclusions.
> A possible way around would be to define the functions in .bashrc and
> then source .bashrc, but I
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:32:57 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> >> I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
>> >
>> > source ~/.bashrc
>>
>> Guess that I am having bad lucks now, having two people replied without
>> even reading my question, and the two replies are
ving two people replied without
> even reading my question, and the two replies are the only replies that I
> get...
how does this not answer your question? Ken suggests that you need to
source .bashrc. That makes sense to me. The aliases defined in .bashrc
are not in scope unless you sou
T o n g([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi,
>
> A (adv) bash alias expansion question --
> How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
>
> I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
>
> $ alias rd
> alias rd=
4, 2008 at 03:55:51AM +, T o n g wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
> > >
> > > Yes I have. Use functions. Don't use aliases.
> > >
> >
> > On command-line:
> >
> &
P or not. Read it again pls.
> >
> > Yes I have. Use functions. Don't use aliases.
> >
>
> On command-line:
>
> function dt () {
> push +$1
And this should do? Is this supposed to be "pushd"? Why the '+'?
pushd +1?
> }
>
&g
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:12:56 +
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:55:51AM +, T o n g wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
>
> Yes I have. Use functions. Don't use aliases.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:55:51AM +, T o n g wrote:
> I'm wondering if you have read my OP or not. Read it again pls.
Yes I have. Use functions. Don't use aliases.
--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt'
eplies that I
get...
Here is the full OP -- let me try for the last time:
Hi,
An advanced bash alias expansion question --
How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
$ alias rd
alias rd='rmdir'
$
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:55:51AM +, T o n g wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:21:37 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> >> I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
> >>
> >> $ alias rd
> >> alias rd='rmdir'
> >>
> >> $ type dt
> >> dt is a function
> >> dt ()
>
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:21:37 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
>>
>> $ alias rd
>> alias rd='rmdir'
>>
>> $ type dt
>> dt is a function
>> dt ()
>> {
>> pushd +$1
>> }
>>
>> How can I use them in my script? . .
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:10:13PM +, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A (adv) bash alias expansion question --
> How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
>
> I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
>
> $ alias rd
> alias
Hi,
A (adv) bash alias expansion question --
How can I use my aliases or functions in my bash script?
I have the following alias and function defined in my ~/.bashrc:
$ alias rd
alias rd='rmdir'
$ type dt
dt is a function
dt ()
{
pushd +$1
}
How can I use
e accounts then use virtual mailboxes, otherwise
use (plain) aliases.
I alias all system accounts to root, and root to user accounts for
administrators (i.e. me). On my personal work-station I also have a
virtual alias:
allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so mail send from this host to myself is deliver
Hello,
As a newbie I need advices concerning Postfix accounts
method.
I am dithering between aliases to local system
accounts and virtual mailboxes.
I have only a domain to manage (so virtual mailboxes
are not mandatory, only an option)
But I need a good level of security
So :
- alias to
ut .bashrc won't.
Hope it solves your problem!
> Christian
>
Cheers,
Cassiano Leal
P.S.: Please don't top-post as it makes it harder to follow long threads.
> Cassiano Bertol Leal schrieb:
> Christian Ruffer wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>
Hash: SHA1
Christian Ruffer wrote:
Hello,
can you please tell me how to set colors and aliases in my bash.
I read the docs and comments, which told me to add or uncomment the
lines in /home/user/.bashrc.
I did that, but the changes didn't take an effect.
For the root user it works when I chang
:
Hello,
can you please tell me how to set colors and aliases in my bash.
I read the docs and comments, which told me to add or uncomment the
lines in /home/user/.bashrc.
I did that, but the changes didn't take an effect.
For the root user it works when I change /root/.bashrc
How can I chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Ruffer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can you please tell me how to set colors and aliases in my bash.
> I read the docs and comments, which told me to add or uncomment the
> lines in /home/user/.bashrc.
> I did that, but the chan
Hello,
can you please tell me how to set colors and aliases in my bash.
I read the docs and comments, which told me to add or uncomment the
lines in /home/user/.bashrc.
I did that, but the changes didn't take an effect.
For the root user it works when I change /root/.bashrc
How can I c
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> My base minimal net install of Etch for not have the "ip" binary at all. A
> search in Debian packages shows that it belongs to "iproute".
Correct.
> iproute is (obviously) not a default package, and it's last changelog was in
> 2006.
The Stable release of Debian is "s
I'm trying to install some software that is able to add secondary IP addresses
to the computer.
I've alway used to useing ip aliases, with ifconfig, for example.: eth0:1
The docs I'm reading recommend using "secondary ips" instead of aliases. It
says that IP Aliases a
found that local aliases (/etc/aliases) are
ignored. Instead, unqualified addresses are qualified, then sent out.
Therefore, mail addressed to root goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rather than the actual sysadmins. I thought that even with "no local
mail", admin mail should work, but either I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to make mailman work with exim4 and need to enable the
possibility of piping to programs in the /etc/aliases file. Does anyone
know how to do that? The /usr/share/doc/exim4-base/README.Debian.gz file
says that piping is disabled by default
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:25:44 +
Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vOn Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:24:47 -0400
> Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:40:13 +0100
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > On 20.03.07 15:18, Celeja
vOn Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:24:47 -0400
Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:40:13 +0100
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > On 20.03.07 15:18, Celejar wrote:
> > > Not sure what you mean. How can I access it directly from the
> > > internet wi
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:40:13 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> On 20.03.07 15:18, Celejar wrote:
> > Not sure what you mean. How can I access it directly from the internet
> > without knowing the IP address or using the long dynamic DNS name?
>
> put 'search the.dy
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:40:13 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 03:44, Celejar wrote:
> > > > I do indeed have my router / dhcp server configured to assign a
> > > > specific IP address to the system, (recognized by its MAC address), as
> > > > y
> > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 03:44, Celejar wrote:
> > > I do indeed have my router / dhcp server configured to assign a
> > > specific IP address to the system, (recognized by its MAC address), as
> > > you suggest. The problem is that I also access the same system over the
> > > internet via dyna
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:27:08 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 03:44, Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:57 +0100
> >
> > Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Monday 19 March 2007 14:48, Celejar wrote:
> > > > I don't, in general, kn
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 03:44, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:57 +0100
>
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 19 March 2007 14:48, Celejar wrote:
> > > I don't, in general, know the IP address. I have a system on my LAN,
> >
> >
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:57 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 14:48, Celejar wrote:
> > I don't, in general, know the IP address. I have a system on my LAN,
> ^
>
> if it's on your LAN, wh
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:45:59 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't, in general, know the IP address. I have a system on my LAN,
> > accessible on the internet via a dynamic DNS name. I want to refer to
> > it by a short nickname. That's
Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't, in general, know the IP address. I have a system on my LAN,
> accessible on the internet via a dynamic DNS name. I want to refer to
> it by a short nickname. That's exactly what the 'HostName' option in
How long are your hostnames? I deliberately choo
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
