I am using the official python docker image which builds out of Bullseye
> (btw, this happens in bookworm too). Until yesterday when I ran `adduser
> --system nonroot` it would populate `$HOME` with `/home/notroot/`. Today I
> rebuilt the image and it is set to `/nonexistent`. Was this inte
I should report.
>
> I am using the official python docker image which builds out of Bullseye
> (btw, this happens in bookworm too). Until yesterday when I ran `adduser
> --system nonroot` it would populate `$HOME` with `/home/notroot/`. Today I
> rebuilt the image and it is s
(btw, this happens in bookworm too). Until yesterday when I ran `adduser
--system nonroot` it would populate `$HOME` with `/home/notroot/`. Today I
rebuilt the image and it is set to `/nonexistent`. Was this intentional or
is it a bug? I cannot find any reference to this change anywhere but maybe
I
Such an excellent advice! Thank you for having taken the time to post this.
Yesterday, i was desperate after 24h of running in circles with a
scripting problem. When i decided to post a question in here, it took me
at least one hour to complete the writing and the gathering of
information. Despite
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:05:50AM +0530, Ishaan Mahajan wrote:
> Sorry for another email but this is what it looks like now - RUN sudo
> adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH --disabled-password $USERNAME && \
> However, I am still running into the same problem.
You need to listen to
Sorry for another email but this is what it looks like now - RUN sudo
adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH --disabled-password $USERNAME && \
However, I am still running into the same problem.
Thanks,
Ishaan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:53 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
> Ishaan Mahajan wr
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 12:17:54PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:23:11 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > sudo adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH --disabled-password --gecos ""
> > $USERNAME
> >
> > That's your first command line
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:23:11 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> sudo adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH --disabled-password --gecos ""
> $USERNAME
>
> That's your first command line. --gecos expects a value. You are
> literally supplying no value.
>
> Why don't you
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:24:04PM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 8/4/22, Ishaan Mahajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the line I have got - RUN sudo adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH
> > --disabled-password --gecos "" $USERNAME && \
> &
Ishaan Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the line I have got - RUN sudo adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH
> --disabled-password --gecos "" $USERNAME && \
> echo "$USERNAME ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL" > /etc/sudoers.d/$USERNAME && \
> chmod 0
On 8/4/22, Ishaan Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the line I have got - RUN sudo adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH
> --disabled-password --gecos "" $USERNAME && \
> echo "$USERNAME ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL" > /etc/sudoers.d/$USERNAME && \
Hi,
This is the line I have got - RUN sudo adduser --shell $USERSHELLPATH
--disabled-password --gecos "" $USERNAME && \
echo "$USERNAME ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL" > /etc/sudoers.d/$USERNAME && \
chmod 0440 /etc/sudoers.d/USERNAME
However, I keep getting th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 04:41:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Thank you very much, Tomás.
glad to help.
[...]
> But once my user's (in your terminology, steph's) public key is in the
> test account's authorized_keys file, user steph can login with
Hi Greg and Tomás (one mail for all to limit the load of this thread on
the list) :-)
Greg Wooledge:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:31:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
[...]
> As user root:
>
> stephan@hostname:~$ sudo mkdir -p ~test/.ssh
> stephan@hostname:~$ sudo sh -c 'cat ~stephan/.ssh/id_rsa.pu
Thank you very much, Tomás.
to...@tuxteam.de:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:31:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> Hi
>> to...@tuxteam.de:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:35:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
[...]
>> I have created a new user account with
>> addu
Stephan Beck:
> Thanks, Greg. I trimmed your message just to let you know that it does
> not work.
To be clear: after having found my solution I did your test (only the
test reproduced at the end of your message) and my solution does not work.
Thanks
Stephan
Thanks, Greg. I trimmed your message just to let you know that it does
not work.
Greg Wooledge:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:31:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
> As user stephan, to test that it works:
>
> stephan@hostname:~$ ssh test@localhost id
>
> If your username isn't actually "stephan",
Hi,
Stephan Beck:
> Hi
>
> Stephan Beck:
>> Hi
>>
>> to...@tuxteam.de:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:35:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
>> How do I get this public key onto localhost?
>
> No need to reply, I'll send the answer to document my solution within
> minutes.
Solution (feel
d a solution and other chimed in with sage advice.
> >
>
> Well, I have another one :-), a question, not a solution yet.
>
>
> I have created a new user account with
> adduser --disabled-password
> What do I want to do?
> I'd like to login to this account &quo
Hi
Stephan Beck:
> Hi
>
> to...@tuxteam.de:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:35:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
>>
>>
> How do I get this public key onto localhost?
No need to reply, I'll send the answer to document my solution within
minutes.
Stephan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:31:00PM +, Stephan Beck wrote:
> I have created a new user account with
> adduser --disabled-password
> What do I want to do?
> I'd like to login to this account "test" from my normal user account by
> ssh via pubkey authentication. My
ho has a special question
>
> No need to be sorry :-)
Fine! :-)
>
> But I see you found a solution and other chimed in with sage advice.
>
Well, I have another one :-), a question, not a solution yet.
I have created a new user account with
adduser --disabled-password
What do I want to
On Friday 17 May 2013 20:04:44 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 17 mai 13, 20:43:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 21:06 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Vi, 17 mai 13, 16:49:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > What the f...
> > > >
> > > > I got this, after sending my reply (to the
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 20:43:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 21:06 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Vi, 17 mai 13, 16:49:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > What the f...
> > >
> > > I got this, after sending my reply (to the list only) to the request
> > > from Pol Hallen :
> >
> > [sni
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 21:06 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 17 mai 13, 16:49:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > What the f...
> >
> > I got this, after sending my reply (to the list only) to the request
> > from Pol Hallen :
>
> [snip]
>
> Please contact the listmasters about such issues. Probab
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 16:49:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> What the f...
>
> I got this, after sending my reply (to the list only) to the request
> from Pol Hallen :
[snip]
Please contact the listmasters about such issues. Probably some
subscriber has a misconfigured mail server and has to be unsubscri
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 17:37 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> My apologies to the original poster. I didn't get this "spam" when I
> replied to a thread about printers today, I got it only for this thread
> and since the original poster (perhaps by accident) requested receipt, I
> was suspicious.
PS:
My apologies to the original poster. I didn't get this "spam" when I
replied to a thread about printers today, I got it only for this thread
and since the original poster (perhaps by accident) requested receipt, I
was suspicious.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
I am getting these*, every time I post. I have told both boghofilter and
Gmail that they atrer spam, but I am still getting them. :-(
Lisi
*_
This is the Postfix program at host smtp.aso.ee.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> What the f...
>
> I got this, after sending my reply (to the list only) to the request
> from Pol Hallen :
I received the same error replying to an unrelated thread, so I don't
think this is a problem at Pol's mail host.
Cheers,
To
0300 (EEST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; jaanus.k...@eesti.ee
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding loop for
jaanus.k...@eesti.ee
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:21 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> Is there a package to adduser with automatic random/crypted pass
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:21 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> Is there a package to adduser with automatic random/crypted password?
>
> I can do an automatic script but if there's a package is better.
>
> thanks!
>
> Pol
Sorry, I couldn't resist t
Hi all :-)
Is there a package to adduser with automatic random/crypted password?
I can do an automatic script but if there's a package is better.
thanks!
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Fri, 10 May 2013 17:17:42 +0200
Pol Hallen wrote:
> What is the easy way to send a "welcome mail" after created a new
> user?
>
Maybe mailx?
mail -s "welcome message" recipient < welcome.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Vi, 10 mai 13, 17:17:42, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> What is the easy way to send a "welcome mail" after created a new user?
This probably depends a lot on how users' mailboxes are setup and you
haven't provided any information about that.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.or
Hi folks!
What is the easy way to send a "welcome mail" after created a new user?
thanks!
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305101717.42233...@
On 11/25/12, Wolf Halton wrote:
> right.
> usermod makes changes to user.
> useradd is not interactive, so makes an automated script for adding many
> users more possible to write. including setting nonstandard home directory
> or extra groups.
> adduser is interactive but does
right.
usermod makes changes to user.
useradd is not interactive, so makes an automated script for adding many
users more possible to write. including setting nonstandard home directory
or extra groups.
adduser is interactive but does not let you put a user in multiple groups,
i don't
and only name in a usr account to the
> > > > groups
> > > > file for printing.
> > >
> > > I would use, as super user:
> > >
> > > # usermod -Ga lp
> >
> > On Debian the 'adduser' tool should be used.
Maybe
erk. Sorry, Doug.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Thanks for responding to the subject instead of the content, Tom.
>
> I swear, I must be getting too old for this. Or maybe I just have too
> many questions to remember which one I'm asking. Oh. Either way, I'll
> be lazy and b
On 03/20/2011 10:15 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
It's nano and the reason that nano's called by visudo (paradoxically)
is that visudo calls "/usr/bin/editor" and the alternatives system
maps it to "/usr/bin/nano".
You can run visudo with "EDITOR=vi visudo"
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
It's nano and the reason that nano's called by visudo (paradoxically)
is that visudo calls "/usr/bin/editor" and the alternatives system
maps it to "/usr/bin/nano".
You can run visudo with "EDITOR=vi visudo" if you just want vi in this instance.
(Still forgetting and hitting the reply button instead of reply-all
followed by manually clearing the to: field.
Sorry, Rob.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joel Rees
Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [help-a-newb] adduser okay? (problem with authenticating
with gui
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of which, are the command line user/group management tools
>> (adduser, etc.) going to leave something undone if I use them instead?
>> Or, if I
Dne, 20. 03. 2011 13:28:28 je Rob Owens napisal(a):
Last time I used it, adduser did not add a user to all the default
groups that the GUI does. You'll need to do that manually.
-Rob
+1
I've noticed that too.
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
ction, in a gnome session.
> >
> > I should have got the name of the utility while I had squeeze booted.
> > I'd be posting this from a squeeze account if I could make a non-admin
> > account to do it with.
> >
>
> Speaking of which, are the command line
; > Speaking of which, are the command line user/group management tools
> > (adduser, etc.) going to leave something undone if I use them instead?
> > Or, if I use vipw and hand-copy the bash skeleton, for a user, am I
> > going to regret it later?
>
> AFAIK adduses is
On Sb, 19 mar 11, 20:35:28, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sb, 19 mar 11, 22:19:45, Joel Rees wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of which, are the command line user/group management tools
> > (adduser, etc.) going to leave something undone if I use them instead?
> > Or, if I use
On Sb, 19 mar 11, 22:19:45, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> Speaking of which, are the command line user/group management tools
> (adduser, etc.) going to leave something undone if I use them instead?
> Or, if I use vipw and hand-copy the bash skeleton, for a user, am I
> going to regret i
e posting this from a squeeze account if I could make a non-admin
> account to do it with.
>
Speaking of which, are the command line user/group management tools
(adduser, etc.) going to leave something undone if I use them instead?
Or, if I use vipw and hand-copy the bash skeleton, fo
When I try to add a new user, adduser is calling chfn in such a
way as to cause chfn to ask for the root password. Output from
adduser looks like this:
# adduser test
Adding user test' ...
Adding new group test' (1010) ...
Adding new user test' (1010) with group test' ...
The
On Friday, 12. October 2007 15:24, Florian Lindner wrote:
> Hello,
> is it possible to use adduser non interactive? I've searched the manpage
> but found no switch.
> I know about useradd but I've read that adduser tries to be more Debian
> like.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
Hello,
is it possible to use adduser non interactive? I've searched the manpage but
found no switch.
I know about useradd but I've read that adduser tries to be more Debian like.
Thanks,
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
`/etc/passwd' may have wrong owner. But this can be fixed,
if i will re-add appropriate user myself. I would like to supply my
installation options to packages i need, but like you've said, more
flexible and easy installation process will be a big step forward.
Anyway to pull and then u
group --system postdrop
chown postfix:postdrop $MAILDROP
fi
Example from the bind9 postinst script:
getent group bind >/dev/null 2>&1 || addgroup --system bind
getent passwd bind >/dev/null 2>&1 ||
adduser --system --home /var/cache/bind --no-create
* Bob Proulx
>
> Oleg Verych wrote:
>> I'm just a user, but developers seem to have some problems in the
>> past: #208848.
>
> But Bug#208848 says that cron needed a dependency upon adduser, which
> it now has because of that bug. Reading that bug this was
> sp
Oleg Verych wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> I'm just a user, but developers seem to have some problems in the
> past: #208848.
But Bug#208848 says that cron needed a dependency upon adduser, which
it now has because of that bug. Reading that bug this was
specifically for build
* Bob Proulx (Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:48:18 -0600)
>
> Oleg Verych wrote:
[--]
>> Funny, i've discovered, how bloated adduser is yesterday, while
>> developing my aggressive distro-cleaner. Now i'm thinking about
>> writing patches at least for exim4 and cron to ha
Oleg Verych wrote:
> Rick Spillane wrote:
> > In the future, I will *not* use adduser, and I would
> > recommend that Debian have this application not be in the default path
> > or some substitute that issues a warning.
Strange. adduser has always worked perfectly f
ere is usually a group
created for each user... I recommend you _not_ use a gui to add users
and instead use adduser from the cli. Also you should probably scan
the bugs of the gui you've been using and see if you problem has been
reported or not and whether the corrupting of /etc/group is inc
* Rick Spillane (26-07-2007)
> OK, I've figured it out. adduser modifies /etc/group apparently, and
> relatively significantly. I was able to fix all my problems by looking
> at Octavio's /etc/group, and adding the groups that looked like they
> were missing. In the fu
OK, I've figured it out. adduser modifies /etc/group apparently, and
relatively significantly. I was able to fix all my problems by looking
at Octavio's /etc/group, and adding the groups that looked like they
were missing. In the future, I will *not* use adduser, and I would
recommend t
OK. So I investigated what statoverride is, and its a list of names
that can be used to install packages under. I checked
/var/lib/dpkg/statoverride, and it seems as though there is indeed a
name 'root' in there, thus doubling my confusion. My guess is that the
there was once a root group in /etc/
7; in statoverride file
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)
A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
I think that adduser messed up my groups file, and now a lot of stuff,
including dpkg and my sound isn't working. Any ideas? I wish I could
just restore my /etc directory to
Twice I have used adduser to add a new user to my laptop, and each
time afterward, I find that I am unable to use my sound device. When I
use programs that output sound as root however, I am able to hear
sound. Figuring that this is a permissions related issue, I checked my
/etc/group file, and
Hi Florian,
On 6/19/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As fas as I know, the error message "adduser: Only one or two names
allowed." means that you provided more than two non-option arguments to
adduser; it has nothing to do with the number of users on your syst
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 17:38:27 +, Manon Metten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to add another user to my system, but adduser won't let me.
> It complains with the error msg: adduser: Only one or two names allowed.
> I wanted to add a user with the user name "guest&quo
Hi,
I want to add another user to my system, but adduser won't let me.
It complains with the error msg: adduser: Only one or two names allowed.
I wanted to add a user with the user name "guest", but other names are
also rejected. My guess is these two users are root & me (m
[redirected from gmane.linux.distributions.grml.user]
hi
whenever I add a user in grml, I get the following error:
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Remote system error - Connection
refused
The respond that I got is that
- the Debian's useradd tried to run userauth via NIS by default,
Hi everyone :-)
i need add several user with limit resource
as example: a user can use until 10% of cpu, 10% of ram
how do this thing?!
thanks :-)
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded the last stable netinst image (i386). When I now try to install Debian, I get always the error Couldnt download adduser! What could I do to avoid this error and make a netinsall of Debian???
Thanks in advance for helping.. Housi Mueller
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access
ny examples so I don't know
> about the syntax (if any). Could you give me some pointer?
The man page for adduser points you to /etc/adduser.conf.
man adduser.conf
But I think what you want is not in the feature set. So you would
need to use a script to do this automatically. The adduser
#x27;can't find any examples
so I don't know about the syntax (if any). Could you give me some
pointer?
I know, I can write a little shell script. I made it for Woody. I'm sure
it would work on Sarge too. Now I would know about that defaults file.
After all, adduser is a perl scrip
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:46 +0200, Roman Muñoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that Sarge's new users "adduser xxx" by default aren't on group
> "camera" so a friend of mine has been drived nuts before I got their
> Kodak working :)
>
> It was the sam
Roman Muñoz wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Question is: where can I set these default groups the user will be in? I
> reviewed adduser and /etc/adduser.conf and found nothing
'man adduser' clearly tells that you can provide arguments to specify
your custom choices.
--
Miroir de logic
Hi,
I found that Sarge's new users "adduser xxx" by default aren't on group
"camera" so a friend of mine has been drived nuts before I got their
Kodak working :)
It was the same on woody where I needed to add new user to groups
"audio", etc, in order to
adduser(8) states that
With the --disabled-login option, the account will be created but
will be disabled until a password is set. The --disabled-password
option will not set a password, but login are still possible for
example through SSH RSA keys.
I wonder what is the
ry), the server is Debian (named debbie). Buddy set it up. He is
>>very, very good, but had to do some customization (maybe a lot). After
>>doing updates, upgrades, and dist-upgrades on the lab test system with
>>no apparent ill effects, I thought it was time to do the same to the
&
ent ill effects, I thought it was time to do
> the same to the
> newspapers server. In the process I broke 'adduser'.
So
> far, the
> solution appears to involve LDAP. None of us seems to
> have much
> experience with that. Buddy has since moved and isn't
>
- Original Message -
Subject: adduser problem
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:45:34 -0500
From: Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings,
I volunteer in my church's computer lab (hence my email name) and
advocate Linux where and wheneve
> story), the server is Debian (named debbie). Buddy set it up. He is
> very, very good, but had to do some customization (maybe a lot). After
> doing updates, upgrades, and dist-upgrades on the lab test system with
> no apparent ill effects, I thought it was time to do the same to the
On Sunday, 10 October 2004 23:45, Jim Hall wrote:
> Greetings,
>
snip
>
> The newspaper has been working on a series of articles about the
> switchover from Windoze to Linux. Right now they're not very happy with
> Debian. Is there anyone who offers paid, secure support for Debian?
> Donation to th
had to do some customization (maybe a lot). After
doing updates, upgrades, and dist-upgrades on the lab test system with
no apparent ill effects, I thought it was time to do the same to the
newspapers server. In the process I broke 'adduser'. So far, the
solution appears to involve LDAP. None
Vijaya
> i need this for my mail server
If you need it for your mail server, the default MTA Exim on Debian can
handle 'rewriting' via /etc/email-addresses. Inside
/etc/email-addresses, map john --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hth.
--
ragOO VU2RGU
Help keep the Radio Spectrum FREE
Help keep Co
Vijaya S said:
> Hi all,
> I want to add a user with .in between for example john.doe
>
> But in debian sarge i was not able to do it with adduser
> so i tried with useradd and it was successful. There was an entry in
> /etc/passwd file
> But when i cd /home/john.doe
>
Vijaya S wrote:
Hi all,
I want to add a user with .in between for example john.doe
But in debian sarge i was not able to do it with adduser
so i tried with useradd and it was successful. There was an entry in
/etc/passwd file
But when i cd /home/john.doe
it says no such file or directory and i
Hi all,
I want to add a user with .in between for example john.doe
But in debian sarge i was not able to do it with adduser
so i tried with useradd and it was successful. There was an entry in
/etc/passwd file
But when i cd /home/john.doe
it says no such file or directory and i cant see any
the adduser command is run, the command just hangs and a control C
is the only way to get out of it.
This error appears after the conrol C:
# adduser billy
Caught a SIGINT.
Cleaning up.
Any help or advice would be great. Not sure where to start looking for the
problem.
Thanks
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 07:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: adduser problem
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I want to create user account with dot between the username,
> but can'
Dear All,
I want to create user account with dot between the username, but can't create, what setting should i change?
test:~# adduser abc.ken
adduser: Please enter a username consisting of a lower case letter
followed by lower case letters and numbers. Use the `--force-badname'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I am root and want create new user ...
>
> $> whoami
> $> root
> $> adduser test
> $> Password:
Under the hood, "adduser" uses "useradd" (from the "passwd" package)
to do its work. My "adduser&q
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:50:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> $> Password:
>
> Once I have inserted root password it passed through it and added new user.
>
> Is it normal?
Yes, that is the password of the user you have to set. Without a
password a user can't login.
(You can use the --d
I am root and want create new user ...
$> whoami
$> root
$> adduser test
$> Password:
Once I have inserted root password it passed through it and added new user.
Is it normal?
Is it behaviour for increasing security or the PC is hacked?
How do I turn off th
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:03:20PM +0100, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> I always edited the group, passwd and shadow files per hand to
> add/remove/alter groups/users and I never had any problem.
>
> Is there any drawback I missed in using this procedure? Or is this simply
> a matter of convenience?
i
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:03:20PM +0100, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > In general, I suggest using adduser on Debian rather than useradd.
> > useradd is the low-level tool; adduser is the higher-level utility which
> > is intended to be easier to use.
>
> In general, I suggest using adduser on Debian rather than useradd.
> useradd is the low-level tool; adduser is the higher-level utility which
> is intended to be easier to use.
I always edited the group, passwd and shadow files per hand to
add/remove/alter groups/users and I neve
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:52:14PM +0200, Thorsten Klein wrote:
| hi,
|
| i'd like to know if it's possible to use the adduser script with a
| ldap-server on woody.
|
| i'd googled for a while and can't find anything usefull on that topic.
Take a look at
http://sour
Thorsten Klein said:
> hi,
>
> i'd like to know if it's possible to use the adduser script with a
> ldap-server on woody.
I don't think so. even if 'passwd' works, that still leaves a big
chunk out: authenticating to the database to add a user to it. I do
hi,
i'd like to know if it's possible to use the adduser script with a
ldap-server on woody.
i'd googled for a while and can't find anything usefull on that topic.
everything else seems to work (in fact everything that i have tested ;)
e.g. ssh, imap, su...) but i can't
louie miranda wrote (on 20 Feb 2002 at 4:56):
> try useradd
Did you?
T.
--
-- Tony Crawford
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- +49-3341-30 99 99
--
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
