Re: Activating ls colors by default

2004-05-01 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 05:59:36PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Markus Lindström wrote: > > Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Please be specific. What does "activated" mean? Does it mean that > > > you have this following alias in your ~/.bashrc file? > > > > > >eval `dircolors -b` > > >alias ls='ls

Re: Activating ls colors by default

2004-05-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Markus Lindström wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Please be specific. What does "activated" mean? Does it mean that > > you have this following alias in your ~/.bashrc file? > > > >eval `dircolors -b` > >alias ls='ls --color=auto' > > Yes, that's the behavior I'm trying to obtain. Does yo

Re: Activating ls colors by default

2004-05-01 Thread Markus Lindström
Bob Proulx wrote: Markus Lindström wrote: I'm trying to find a way to make bash use ls colors by default, on all virtual consoles. It seems my ~/.bashrc has this activated, but it only uses it on any virtual terminal I create in X. Please be specific. What does "activated" mean? Does it mean

Re: Activating ls colors by default

2004-05-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Markus Lindström wrote: > I'm trying to find a way to make bash use ls colors by default, on all > virtual consoles. It seems my ~/.bashrc has this activated, but it only > uses it on any virtual terminal I create in X. Please be specific. What does "activated" mean? Does it mean that you have

Re: Activating ls colors by default

2004-05-01 Thread Alec Berryman
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:28:44AM +0200, Markus Lindstr?m wrote: > I'm trying to find a way to make bash use ls colors by default, on > all virtual consoles. It seems my ~/.bashrc has this activated, but > it only uses it on any virtual terminal I create in X. > > I searched around the disk a bit