On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:51:07PM -0400, Dale Harris wrote:
> Just heard from Christian Marrilat, he's going to get rid of mozilla-acroread:
>
> You must forget this package. Now iceweasel include is own pdf
> reader. Remove this package (I'll also remove this package fro
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 19:51:07 Dale Harris wrote:
> try to open a pdf file from iceweasel.
No problem at all, and hasn't been for a while now.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
Just heard from Christian Marrilat, he's going to get rid of mozilla-acroread:
You must forget this package. Now iceweasel include is own pdf
reader. Remove this package (I'll also remove this package from my
repository) and try to open a pdf file from iceweasel.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014
Is anyone else having problems with Iceweasel not seeing nppdf.so from
mozilla-acroread? I even copy nppdf.so to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins,
restart the browser and nope.
iceweasel 24.5.0esr-1 amd62
mozilla-acroread 9.5.5-dmo1 i386
I get mozilla-acroread from deb-multimedia, of course
after an update some months ago, pdf and jpg files started to be opened
by gnome preview instead of geeqie and acroread.
i use xfce and find gnome preview not very useful because i can print
only, not save files were i like.
how can i change this behavieur?
thanks
aldo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
2012-12-13 07:30, lina skrev:
On Thursday 13,December,2012 02:24 PM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
2012-12-13 05:25, lina skrev:
Acroread is now a multiarch-package, as it says on the deb-multimedia
website, and the amd64 package for acroread is gone. The point of
multiarch is to allow installation of
Thanks, I have installed the acroread as well as other 75 packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c97ab4.4070...@gmail.com
On Thursday 13,December,2012 02:24 PM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
> 2012-12-13 05:25, lina skrev:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1. I kept the acroread related from updating for half a year, I guess.
>>
>> 2. Today, I tried full-upgrade,
>> [...]
>> 3. From http://www.deb-
2012-12-13 05:25, lina skrev:
Hi,
1. I kept the acroread related from updating for half a year, I guess.
2. Today, I tried full-upgrade,
[...]
3. From http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
I try:
To install new acroread packages :
dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt-get update
apt-get install acroread
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> acroread:i386 acroread-debian-files:i386 cups-bsd gcc-4.7-base:i386
> libatk1.0-0:i386 libavahi-client3:i386 libavahi-common-data:i386
> libavahi-common3:i386 libc6:i386 libc6-i686:i386 libcairo2:i386
> libcomerr2:i38
Simplified speaking, how to install the acroread?
partial of my source.list is:
deb [arch=amd64,i386] http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ wheezy main non-free
Thanks,
Best regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi,
1. I kept the acroread related from updating for half a year, I guess.
2. Today, I tried full-upgrade,
The following packages will be REMOVED:
acroread{a} acroread-debian-files{a} acroread-escript{a} blcr-dkms{a}
fglrx-glx-ia32{a} ia32-libs{a} ia32-libs-dev{a} ia32-libs-gtk{a}
ia32-libs
owever, Xerox doesn't offer a Linux PCL file for this
> Phaser.
Mmmm, you're right:
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Xerox/Xerox-Phaser_6280
There is only one driver (PS) for linux though the printer supports
PCL6 ;-(
(trick: you can try with a generic PCL6 driver¹)
> W
machine, I fixed a
similar problem by switching (at your suggestion) to the PCL description.
However, Xerox doesn't offer a Linux PCL file for this Phaser.
What's more baffling to me is why printing from acroread just stopped
working. Neither the PPD nor any of the acroread packages have
needed when I first brought it up. If I delete that PPD, printing from
> acroread succeeds, but then it doesn't offer any of the printer options
> I like.
You can add another printer (I mean, another stanza for the same printer,
your "Phaser 6280DN") from CUPS that uses the d
Within the last week or so, my Wheezy machine has lost its ability to
successfully print a test PDF from acroread 9.4.2 to its USB CUPS printer
(Xerox Phaser 6280DN). The printout is now just a page with a few PostScript
errors.
I don't think this is a CUPS problem. lpstat -t shows no
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:14:29AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Jo, 19 mai 11, 18:07:44, Freeman wrote:
> ...
> > 18 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/acroread.1.gz', which is
> > also in
> > 19 /package adobereader-enu 9.3.2
>
> Get ri
On Jo, 19 mai 11, 18:07:44, Freeman wrote:
> Wanted to try Acroread.
>
> The package acroread-debian-files would not install. There are no
> dependency problems.
>
> I switched to apt-get at the prompt.
>
> About line 111 below I dpkg-configure says it can't over
Wanted to try Acroread.
The package acroread-debian-files would not install. There are no
dependency problems.
I switched to apt-get at the prompt.
About line 111 below I dpkg-configure says it can't overwrite a man file.
So I try to move that file in line 122 to no avail.
Now apt
I had the same problem until I installed some of the optional acroread
packages (acroread-plugins and mozilla-acroread). That fixed the issue and
now I can fill in and save pdf forms
--Tavi
On 2011-03-09, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
>
I filled them out with evince (buggy on one field of the 1040 form when
saving; you can save the filled-in file and the form still remains
fillable afterwards, which I wasn't able to do with Adobe when
On 03/10/2011 12:01 AM, S D wrote:
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
PGP/GPG and TLS are *significantly* more secure than
mailing your papers.
You seem to forget that in the process you entrust your data to a *for-profit*
corporation that will store and use it in the way tha
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> PGP/GPG and TLS are *significantly* more secure than
> mailing your papers.
You seem to forget that in the process you entrust your data to a *for-profit*
corporation that will store and use it in the way that profits them, though you
may fin
In <87aah3hpf0@thumper.dhh.gt.org>, John Hasler wrote:
>I wrote:
>> No electronic transmission method can be as secure as walking into
>> my CPA's office and handing him papers.
In <201103091258.46708@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>Similarly, if you engage a tax profess
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> ...are the most secure way to exchange information publicly available.
I wrote:
> That statement is certainly false on its face. No electronic
> transmission method can be as secure as walking into my CPA's office
> and handing him papers.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-03-09 16:11:47 John Hasler wrote:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
>> ...are the most secure way to exchange information publicly available.
>
>That statement is certainly false on its face. No electronic
>transmission method can be as secure as walking into my CPA's office and
>handing him
I wrote:
> ...the Web is inherently insecure.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> Well, that statement is false on it's face.
History disagrees with you.
> Properly implemented TLS trust chains...
Some probably exist, somewhere. They do not include Verisign.
> ...are the most secure way to exch
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 13:10 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
> >>
> >
> > I'm able to fill form fields and save values with v 9.4.
> >
> >
>
> Yes, but is this th
On 2011-03-09 13:44:32 John Hasler wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
>
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
>> "Publishing" is perhaps a bit harsh. Most web-based tax services use
>> end-to- end encryption to prevent the data from being intercepted both
>> times i
x27;s the first
PDF on
the top lefthand side. On my system clicking that downloads the
form and
opens acroread with it. You're supposed to be able to fill in any
of the
formfields.
Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) but as I
never do online taxes tasks, I'm not sure if
From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:58:41 -0600
> Most web-based tax services use end-to-
> end encryption to prevent the data from being intercepted both times it is
> "on
> the wire": from you to them and from them to the IRS.
True in Canada also. Revenue Canada qual
I wrote:
> Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> "Publishing" is perhaps a bit harsh. Most web-based tax services use
> end-to- end encryption to prevent the data from being intercepted both
> times it is "on the wire": from you to them and from the
didn't try
Okular, Evince, or any of my other installed PDF viewers. I also have
no idea what might be wrong, but at least you know it works for others
with 9.4.2.
This is the acroread 9.4.2 from debian-multimedia?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Eric Morey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
On 2011-03-09 11:10:39 John Hasler wrote:
>Peter E. writes:
>> Isn't a Web based tax calculation more efficient?
>
>Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
"Publishing" is perhaps a bit harsh. Most web-based tax services use end-to-
end encryption to prevent the data from being inter
gt;> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
> >>>>
> >>>> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> >>>> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
> >>>>
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:10 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:31:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 06:31:48 am Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
>
> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the doc
On my system clicking that downloads the form and
opens acroread with it. You're supposed to be able to fill in any of the
formfields.
Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) but as I never do
online taxes tasks, I'm not sure if it's okay with just filling the data
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:10 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:31:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> >> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
> >>
> >> This year I run amd64 a
Peter E. writes:
> Isn't a Web based tax calculation more efficient?
Sure, if you don't mind publishing your tax returns.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:49:18 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:34:41 + (UTC)
>> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) ... I'm not sure
>> if it's okay with just filling the data and then print it or sending
>> the file via e-mail or by direct
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:41:23 -0500, Eric Morey wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 16:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny)
>
> I was not able to save values in the form fields with evince. Only with
> acroread v 9.4.
No? Wei
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:10:55 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom dijo:
>>> Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a pdf viewer?
>> Do you have any URI that we can test?
>Yes, get form 1040 from here: http://www.irs.gov/
I had no trouble using Adobe Reader 9.4.2 on 64-bit Linux. I didn't try
Okular, Evince,
From: Camaleon
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:34:41 + (UTC)
> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) ...
> I'm not sure if it's okay with just filling the data
> and then print it or sending the file via e-mail or by direct upload.
Isn't a Web based tax calculation more efficie
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
>
> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 16:34 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny)
I was not able to save values in the form fields with evince. Only with
acroread v 9.4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
first PDF on
> the top lefthand side. On my system clicking that downloads the form and
> opens acroread with it. You're supposed to be able to fill in any of the
> formfields.
Form 1040 can be filled fine with Evince (from lenny) but as I never do
online taxes tasks, I'm not sur
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:31:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
properties say
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:31:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
>
> This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
> debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
>
Hi,
Last year I was able to fill out US taxforms with acroread 8.1.3.
This year I run amd64 and installed acroread (version 9.4.2) from
debian-multimedia but I cannot edit a single form although the document
properties say "fillable".
Has anyone filled out US taxforms with a
oking for Acroread replacements, I suggest also trying MuPDF.
I've been using Evince for years, but I've just begun trying MuPDF, and
I rather like it, so far. Great keyboard control, and it feels much
lighter than Evince.
http://mupdf.com/
We (at linux side) still lack a 1:1 fu
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:26:01 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>We (at linux side) still lack a 1:1 full-featured PDF solution that can
>>be considered a complete replacement for Acrobat Reader (the same it
>>happens with Adobe Flash Player). Sad but true.
>
> Feel ISO
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:57:34 -0500, Celejar wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:48:16 +0100 Andreas Weber wrote:
>>> On 2010-11-30 13:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> > Any idea ?
>>>
>>> Try evince?
>>
>> If we'
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:57:34 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:48:16 +0100 Andreas Weber wrote:
>
>> On 2010-11-30 13:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> > Any idea ?
>>
>> Try evince? It even works great and simple without fuss on my M$ box.
&
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:48:16 +0100
Andreas Weber wrote:
> On 2010-11-30 13:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > Any idea ?
>
> Try evince? It even works great and simple without fuss on my M$ box.
If we're looking for Acroread replacements, I suggest also trying
MuPDF. I'
On 02/12/10 16:33, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:50:04 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 02/12/10 03:14, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Anyway, besides all these "esoteric" messages and warnings, are you
facing any other problem with the program?
I do not really care about the messages: my
On 2010-11-30 13:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Any idea ?
Try evince? It even works great and simple without fuss on my M$ box.
HTH, ändu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:/
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:50:04 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 02/12/10 03:14, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Anyway, besides all these "esoteric" messages and warnings, are you
>> facing any other problem with the program?
>
> I do not really care about the messages: my issue is that the tabs
> featu
/libgvfsdbus.so
That is to say: a 32bits library, not a 64bits library.
But you should have installed 32-libs compat package and Acrobat should
transparently look for the right one :-?
Meanwhile,
I have uninstalled my Sid acroread, and installed the testing version:
as I expected, the trouble i
s:
> /usr/lib32/gio/modules/libgvfsdbus.so
>
> That is to say: a 32bits library, not a 64bits library.
But you should have installed 32-libs compat package and Acrobat should
transparently look for the right one :-?
> Meanwhile,
> I have uninstalled my Sid acroread, and installed
. what's happening here? Does the library ("libgvfsdbus.so") even
exist in the above mentioned path (/usr/lib/gio/modules/)? :-?
The library exist, but what is really needed is:
/usr/lib32/gio/modules/libgvfsdbus.so
That is to say: a 32bits library, not a 64bits library.
Meanwhile,
I hav
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:44:39 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 01/12/10 21:00, Camaleón wrote:
>>> I will try to fix the errors as:
>>>
>>> /usr/lib/gio/modules/libgvfsdbus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
>>> Failed to load module: /usr/lib/gio/modules/libgvfsdbus.so
>>
>> "Wrong ELF class" could
On 01/12/10 21:00, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:30:38 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 01/12/10 20:13, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Error log is very verbose, though:
http://pastebin.com/kXpMvC5J
Jerome, I am also getting all that stuff so that entries have to be
normal.
I will try t
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:30:38 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 01/12/10 20:13, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Error log is very verbose, though:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/kXpMvC5J
>>
>> Jerome, I am also getting all that stuff so that entries have to be
>> normal.
>
> I will try to fix the errors as:
Original Message
Subject: Re: acroread trouble on Sqeeze
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:30:38 +0800
From: Jerome BENOIT
Reply-To: g62993...@rezozer.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Thanks a lot for your time.
On 01/12/10 20:13, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:50:36
Thanks a lot for your time.
On 01/12/10 20:13, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:50:36 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:36:16 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
let say that I can reproduced the bug on an other Squeeze (amd64)
computer:
Wow... and both are 64-bit installations.
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:50:36 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:36:16 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> let say that I can reproduced the bug on an other Squeeze (amd64)
>> computer:
>
> Wow... and both are 64-bit installations. It should be interesting to
> test acrobat under a 32-b
another setup or just by using a different GTK theme...
which reminds me, @Jerome, you can try to launch acroread with another
- fresh new- user and check if that works.
let say that I can reproduced the bug on an other Squeeze (amd64)
computer:
Wow... and both are 64-bit installations. It
up or just by using a different GTK theme...
>> which reminds me, @Jerome, you can try to launch acroread with another
>> - fresh new- user and check if that works.
>
> let say that I can reproduced the bug on an other Squeeze (amd64)
> computer:
Wow... and both are 64-bit instal
That step was not intended for you but Jerome :-)
:)))
Anyway, it seems you are not running GNOME and this can make the
difference.
Yes. I use KDE4 and multimedia testing, while Jerome uses sid.
Bye,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
let say that I can reproduced the bug on an other Squeeze (amd64)
computer:
In both case, acroread comes from the multimedia repo (sid): version 9.4
I use acroread from testing repo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
by using a different GTK theme...
>> which reminds me, @Jerome, you can try to launch acroread with another
>> - fresh new- user and check if that works.
>>
> I created a new user, than logged into TWM and acroread worked
> prefectly.
That step was not intended for you bu
xplanatory about which app is causing the
problem. Besides, Acrobat Reader can be running fine in your system but
crashing with another setup or just by using a different GTK theme...
which reminds me, @Jerome, you can try to launch acroread with another -
fresh new- user and check if that works.
let
multimedia
Error log is pretty self-explanatory about which app is causing the
problem. Besides, Acrobat Reader can be running fine in your system but
crashing with another setup or just by using a different GTK theme...
which reminds me, @Jerome, you can try to launch acroread with another -
fresh new
Adobe
site)?
Error log is pretty self-explanatory about which app is causing the
problem. Besides, Acrobat Reader can be running fine in your system but
crashing with another setup or just by using a different GTK theme...
which reminds me, @Jerome, you can try to launch acroread with another -
fresh
Hi,
An error in Acrobat Reader package then?
There is a similar bug report for OOo:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521775
But Acrobat Reader is closed source so bugs can be only reported upstream
(to Adobe). I'm afraid you'll have to wait for an update ;-(
The problem sh
t when using tabs and scrolling down?
>> :-?
>
> I have just tried gEdit: tabs work fine.
>
> So I check my ~/.xsession-errors file: when acroread is launched, I got
> the message:
>
> Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message
> with a
Hello List,
thanks for the hint.
On 01/12/10 02:52, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:30:38 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 30/11/10 22:54, Camaleón wrote:
What do you mean by "acroread gets confused"? It freezes when loading a
second PDF within the same instance (tabbed
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:30:38 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 30/11/10 22:54, Camaleón wrote:
>> What do you mean by "acroread gets confused"? It freezes when loading a
>> second PDF within the same instance (tabbed)? Are you experiencing the
>> same issue when
Hello List,
thanks for your quick reply.
On 30/11/10 22:54, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:48:33 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
since a couple of days,
I have some trouble with acroread on my Squeeze amd64 box which is daily
updated:
fro example, when I deal two PDF files and that I
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:48:33 +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> since a couple of days,
> I have some trouble with acroread on my Squeeze amd64 box which is daily
> updated:
>
> fro example, when I deal two PDF files and that I play tabs, acroread
> gets confused and I get on
Hello List !
since a couple of days,
I have some trouble with acroread on my Squeeze amd64 box which is daily
updated:
fro example, when I deal two PDF files and that I play tabs, acroread gets
confused
and I get on shell the message:
(acroread-en:12304): Gtk-CRITICAL
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:48:40 +0200, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 06. 10. 2010 20:32:09 je Camaleón napisal(a):
>
>> > Wat?! To print tickets?
>>
>> Yep. Boarding pass card.
>>
>> Also the Spanish railways ones (operated by RENFE) work without a
>> glitch
>> (even tickets from many airways checking on
Dne, 06. 10. 2010 20:32:09 je Camaleón napisal(a):
> Wat?! To print tickets?
Yep. Boarding pass card.
Also the Spanish railways ones (operated by RENFE) work without a
glitch
(even tickets from many airways checking online services are printed
just
fine) :-)
Is it any good at printing
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:18:21 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> steef wrote:
>> Camaleón schreef:
>>> I would jump acrobat reader and use Evince/Okular or any other pdf
>>> viewer for daily use.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> evince prints even the (ticket)-files of the dutch railways!
>>
>>
> Wat?! To print tick
steef wrote:
Camaleón schreef:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:44:48 +, #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
When I tried to use acroread my.pdf
it showed me,
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS64
Camaleón schreef:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:44:48 +, #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
When I tried to use acroread my.pdf
it showed me,
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS64
If you
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:43:43 -0400
"John A. Sullivan III" wrote:
Hello John,
> acroread at all (such as its slow performance and its hard coded
I fully acknowledge the performance issues; Sometimes it seems to take
an age to do things, making me think I didn't actually
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:33:53 +
> #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
>
> Hello #ZHAO,
>
> > I just installed the xpdf, obviously it did not work for me, probably
> > some plugins were lack or do I need to uninstall
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:33:53 +
#ZHAO LINA# wrote:
Hello #ZHAO,
> I just installed the xpdf, obviously it did not work for me, probably
> some plugins were lack or do I need to uninstall the acroread after
> the installation of xpdf.
xpdf and acroread should happily co-exist. Obvio
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:58:38 +0800
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Jerome,
> which browser do you use ?
D'oh! The one bit of info I missed; Iceweasel.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
I'd hate to look into those e
Hello List !
On 05/10/10 23:05, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:24:55 +
#ZHAO LINA# wrote:
Hello #ZHAO,
Or anyone who works fine to open the pdf within iceweasel time and
time again would love to share how they handle it. I did not encounter
that problem before when I used
It
Hi,
I believed the acroread was installed the same as you did, from
debian-multimedia repositories, and the debian version is also testing and
amd64.
I checked, the nspluginwrapper were installed also.
I just installed the xpdf, obviously it did not work for me, probably some
plugins were
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:24:55 +
#ZHAO LINA# wrote:
Hello #ZHAO,
> Or anyone who works fine to open the pdf within iceweasel time and
> time again would love to share how they handle it. I did not encounter
> that problem before when I used
It works fine for me. I install from the debian-mult
oblem
> before when I used firefox.
>
I don't know about the relative merits of acroread and xpdf, but I have
no problems with iceweasel and xpdf.
But you say you cannot uninstall "it" - acroread or iceweasel? Can you
install - or persuade someone to install - another pdf r
Hello List !
On 05/10/10 22:24, #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
It's pretty annoying especially when sometimes you need a bunch of papers.
I cannot uninstall it, can somesome provide some solutions?
what John certainly meant is to uninstall the `mozilla-acroread' package ONLY.
If you do so, whe
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:44:48 +, #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
> When I tried to use acroread my.pdf
> it showed me,
>
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
> /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class:
> ELFCLASS64
If you
t;
Jerome
Curious,
Thanks,
lina
From: #ZHAO LINA# [zhao0...@e.ntu.edu.sg]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:24 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: acroread and iceweasel
It's pretty annoying especially when sometimes you need a bunc
Original Message
Subject: Re: acroread and iceweasel
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:49:40 +0800
From: Jerome BENOIT
Reply-To: jgm...@rezozer.net
Organization: none
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hello List !
On 05/10/10 22:24, #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
It's pretty ann
1 - 100 of 670 matches
Mail list logo
