Re: mails to t...@security.debian.org - no ACK?

2011-05-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Fresel Michal: > just wanted to get some feedback on mailing to > t...@security.debian.org > > any knowledge why there is no answer or any ACK of recieve after 8h? There is no autoresponder, so all replies you receive are written by hand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Re: mails to t...@security.debian.org - no ACK?

2011-03-24 Thread Fresel Michal - hi competence e.U.
00:51 schrieb Fresel Michal - hi competence e.U.: > hi > > just wanted to get some feedback on mailing to > t...@security.debian.org > > any knowledge why there is no answer or any ACK of recieve after 8h? > > any spam-filter cutting my mails? > or did i just misspe

mails to t...@security.debian.org - no ACK?

2011-03-24 Thread Fresel Michal - hi competence e.U.
hi just wanted to get some feedback on mailing to > t...@security.debian.org any knowledge why there is no answer or any ACK of recieve after 8h? any spam-filter cutting my mails? or did i just misspelled something? Greets Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r

Re: Ssh connection hangs. Ignored ACK packet?

2008-03-18 Thread Bernardo Dal Seno
I think I've found out why the TCP hangs: someone messes with TCP sequence numbers and get them wrong. I studied some advanced features of TCP, and discovered the existence of "selective acknowledgment" (SACK), which is a very nice feature, by the way. By comparing packets at the two ends of the

Re: Ssh connection hangs. Ignored ACK packet?

2008-03-17 Thread Bernardo Dal Seno
On 17/03/2008, Ken Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MTU is my standard WAG for this kind of thing, having had problems in > the distant past. I don't understand how MTU could be the culprit, as my problem seems to be that a packet is not resent, and not that a packet doesn't arrive. Anyway,

Re: Ssh connection hangs. Ignored ACK packet?

2008-03-17 Thread Ken Irving
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Bernardo Dal Seno wrote: > I have intermittent problems in transferring files between two > machines via scp. Symptomps are: when transferring a large file from > the server to the client, scp transfers a few Kbytes and then says > "stalled". > > ... > Wha

Ssh connection hangs. Ignored ACK packet?

2008-03-17 Thread Bernardo Dal Seno
I have intermittent problems in transferring files between two machines via scp. Symptomps are: when transferring a large file from the server to the client, scp transfers a few Kbytes and then says "stalled". After a while I was having this problem, I tried to investigate it, and captured the TCP

Re: can't boot with Spurious ACK with kernel 2.6.19

2006-12-05 Thread Bernd Prager
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:09:00AM -0500, bernd wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade my Debian box to kernel 1.6.19. > The boot process immediatly locks in a loop with the message: > "atkbd.c: Spurious ACK on isa0060/serio0. Some program might be trying access > hardware dire

can't boot with Spurious ACK with kernel 2.6.19

2006-12-05 Thread bernd
I'm trying to upgrade my Debian box to kernel 1.6.19. The boot process immediatly locks in a loop with the message: "atkbd.c: Spurious ACK on isa0060/serio0. Some program might be trying access hardware directly." The box is running fine with kernel 1.6.18.4. Did anybody dis

Re: gnupg stopped accepting my passphrase (ack!)

2006-02-15 Thread David Scott Coburn
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 22:08, David Scott Coburn wrote: > > This is a bit bizarre. Well, it seems to be working now. I have no clue what the trouble was. Either pilot error, or some problem that took a few reboots to cure. Thanks for the help. Scott -- : David Scott Coburn : "Assume a s

Re: gnupg stopped accepting my passphrase (ack!)

2006-02-14 Thread jlmb
> Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Scott > You could try replacing your ~/.gnupg with a backup in case something really unexplainable happened to it. Besides the funny characters theory and the "unexplainable" I have no idea what could have happened. jorge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: gnupg stopped accepting my passphrase (ack!)

2006-02-14 Thread David Scott Coburn
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 04:41, Jon Dowland wrote: > > That's the only think occurring to me - try entering your passphrase at > a terminal prompt (rather than the GPG passphrase prompt) -- do you see > what you expect, or are some characters incorrect? I tried with a console login (rather than

Re: gnupg stopped accepting my passphrase (ack!)

2006-02-14 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:42:09PM -0500, David Scott Coburn wrote: > I am running Debian Etch on my computer. After doing a dist-upgrade > last night gnupg stopped accepting my passphrases. > It seems that perhaps it is a keyboard/encoding/locale problem of some > sort? That's the only think oc

gnupg stopped accepting my passphrase (ack!)

2006-02-13 Thread David Scott Coburn
Hello, I am running Debian Etch on my computer. After doing a dist-upgrade last night gnupg stopped accepting my passphrases. It looks as though gnupg was not updated. I also run Etch on my computer at work, and it did not have this problem after doing the dist-upgrade. I am running custom ke

Re: Ack. Help.

2004-01-09 Thread VPS Colo Support
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Matthew Bardeen wrote: > Nope. No go. > > A little more information might help, so here goes. It's a custom built 2.4.21 > kernel, with ext3 support built in. Nothing has changed OS wise (AFAIK) that > would cause this problem. > > Just before trying to launch into fsck in the

Re: Ack. Help.

2004-01-09 Thread Matthew Bardeen
Nope. No go. A little more information might help, so here goes. It's a custom built 2.4.21 kernel, with ext3 support built in. Nothing has changed OS wise (AFAIK) that would cause this problem. Just before trying to launch into fsck in the bootup sequence, it gives: EXT3-fs: invalid journal i

Re: Ack. Help.

2004-01-09 Thread Rus Foster
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Matthew Bardeen wrote: > After travelling with my laptop (safely in suspended mode), I turn it on only > to find the following error when it tries to fsck the drive.. > > fsck.ext3: Illegal block number while checking ext3 journal for /dev/hda2 > > an 'ls -al' of the journal fi

Ack. Help.

2004-01-09 Thread Matthew Bardeen
After travelling with my laptop (safely in suspended mode), I turn it on only to find the following error when it tries to fsck the drive.. fsck.ext3: Illegal block number while checking ext3 journal for /dev/hda2 an 'ls -al' of the journal file reveals the following information: b--sr-S--x 2697

ack! StarOffice 5.2 => excel ???

2000-08-28 Thread hawk
Mmpf. I happily exported from StarOffice 5.2 to all three excel formats it supports--5.0, 95, and 97/2000. They all lost at least something. 97/2000 was closest, but it lost column widths, turned gridlines back on, and required me to open the formulas, insert the cursor, and hit enter before

Re: ack! ssh, telnet and smtp don't accept outside requests

2000-07-29 Thread Damon Muller
Quoth Raphael Crawford-Marks, > about two weeks ago, my server (running Potato) stopped accepting ssh, > smtp and telnet requests. I would be able to connect on the respective > ports, but would be disconnected shortly thereafter before receiving a > login prompt. I've uninstalled and reinstalle

Re: ack! ssh, telnet and smtp don't accept outside requests

2000-07-29 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
Hello, I had kind of the same problem. As it turned out, it was right after an apt-get upgrade I did... Figured it messed up my system. As it turned out, I had switched ISP's and my current isp is blocking ports!!! I moved ssh to a new port and it works fine now, just a pain to tell everyone

ack! ssh, telnet and smtp don't accept outside requests

2000-07-29 Thread Raphael Crawford-Marks
about two weeks ago, my server (running Potato) stopped accepting ssh, smtp and telnet requests. I would be able to connect on the respective ports, but would be disconnected shortly thereafter before receiving a login prompt. I've uninstalled and reinstalled all of the packages. The weird thing

Re: Disk error! ACK!

1999-11-02 Thread Jean-Yves BARBIER
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 10:24:27PM -0500, Jon Hughes wrote: > I'm cautious about clearing some illegal block for fearing I'll lose data or > what not. And you're right :) Try to change it again, but this time with 'fdisk' instead of 'cfdisk', some cdfisk versions are not very good, especially wit

Disk error! ACK!

1999-11-02 Thread Jon Hughes
I ran into this problem tonight and I'm trying to be very cautious so if anyone can give me (a semi newbie) some advice I'd appreciate it. Here's what happened. I used CFDISK to re-designate a extra partition on my hard drive from BeOS type (it wasn't being used at all) to Windows95 Fat 32 so t

Re: ACK! Too many ftpds.

1999-07-20 Thread P. van Tilburg
On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 12:28:42AM -0400, Carl Mummert wrote: > You can turn off the netstd ftpd by commenting out the apprpriate line > in /etc/inetd.conf and then '/etc/init.d/netbase restart'. > > As for proftpd, I am not sure if it wants to ru under inetd or as its own > daemon. Look for an

Re: ACK! Too many ftpds.

1999-07-20 Thread Carl Mummert
You can turn off the netstd ftpd by commenting out the apprpriate line in /etc/inetd.conf and then '/etc/init.d/netbase restart'. As for proftpd, I am not sure if it wants to ru under inetd or as its own daemon. Look for an entry (maybe commented out) in /etc/inetd.conf, look for /etc/init.d/p

ACK! Too many ftpds.

1999-07-20 Thread Robert Rati
I want to try and setup an ftp server and wanted to try using proftp as my ftp daemon. I tried to configure it, but when I ftp to the server, I don't get proftpd. I get some other ftp daemon. I did a dpkg -S ftpd and found that netstd appears to have a couple of ftp deamons in it. Can anyone he

Ack!

1999-04-13 Thread Assad Khan
Ignore the message, John. I must of forgot I was reading your e-mail and I didnt send it to the right person. Sorry.     -Assad

Re: "shutdown -r" instead of "reboot"? (was Re: ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-09 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ralf G. R. Bergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:33:53 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > >>Besides, it is good practice to use "shutdown -r now" instead >>of reboot. Or just press ctrlaltdel, because then init just calls >>the command "shutdow

"shutdown -r" instead of "reboot"? (was Re: ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-09 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:33:53 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: >Besides, it is good practice to use "shutdown -r now" instead >of reboot. Or just press ctrlaltdel, because then init just calls >the command "shutdown -r now" for you. Could you please explain why? Thanks. -- Ralf G. R. Bergs

Re: ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-09 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard L. Alhama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >seems like I'm in big trouble here. I've experimented update-rc.d and now >init doesn't know it's runlevel. Well, I can boot but when I issue >"reboot" it coughs up something like: > >couldn't determine runlevel... doi

Re: ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-08 Thread Pere Camps
Rich, > > Stupid question on my side: have you checked /etc/inittab? > Yep they're similar, almost, except I'm on runlevel 5. I've tried > changing default runlevels, same thing. Sorry. No help available then. -- p.

Re: ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-08 Thread Richard L. Alhama
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Pere Camps wrote: > Rich, > > > Everything looks fine 'cept that the init process is doing itself twice > > everytime I boot. > > How do I fix this? > > Stupid question on my side: have you checked /etc/inittab? Yep they're similar, almost, except I'm on runlevel

Re: ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-08 Thread Pere Camps
Rich, > Everything looks fine 'cept that the init process is doing itself twice > everytime I boot. > How do I fix this? Stupid question on my side: have you checked /etc/inittab? It should cointain: # The default runlevel. id:2:initdefault: # /etc/init.d executes the S

ack! I've hosed init

1998-12-08 Thread Richard L. Alhama
seems like I'm in big trouble here. I've experimented update-rc.d and now init doesn't know it's runlevel. Well, I can boot but when I issue "reboot" it coughs up something like: couldn't determine runlevel... doing soft reboot instead. then it reboots. Everything looks fine 'cept that the i

Ack, sparc update is going nuts

1998-10-18 Thread Ben Collins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I ust setup a sparc system with debian (sid) and the load stays way up there because of update: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 16 root 1 0 344 324 284 S 312 36.1 0.6 486:37 update 15074 root 1

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread John Larkin
> > I don't think that's too unreasonable. A while ago, the X server for > > my video card was quite unstable (ATI Mach64 w/chrontel ramdac), and I > > ended up needing to kill the xserver remotely about once every 2 or 3 > > days (the xserver would take over the console and refuse to operate > >

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread Ian Eure
I use KDM, the KDE xdm variant. It does not manage my local display. X is not the problem. X works fine. I just can't get my text console back. On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 02:44:22PM +0100, IH McKeag wrote: > Sorry, I have missed your earlier correspondence but have you tried > > /etc/init.d/x

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 09:33:52AM -0600, John Larkin wrote: > > No... This is not the problem. As I said, X crashed. This makes the X > > server quit without restoring the display, so you just get your X > > desktop sitting there. You can restart X remotely, but when you exit, > > it restores the

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread IH McKeag
Sorry, I have missed your earlier correspondence but have you tried /etc/init.d/xdm start as super-user? Ian. On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Ian Eure wrote: > Don't think a "reset" will do it, as that just manipulates the terminal > behaviours... I'll give it a shot anyways in a minute though.

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread John Larkin
> No... This is not the problem. As I said, X crashed. This makes the X > server quit without restoring the display, so you just get your X > desktop sitting there. You can restart X remotely, but when you exit, > it restores the previous mode, eg a graphical mode instead of a text > console. When

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread Ulisses Alonso Camaro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi! [...] > I have X running on the console (login to another box, ssh over to the > borken one, screen, startx, detatch) - I just can't get the text vtys > back to normal. Tried running a SVGALib program. No dice. The only > thing that works is X. I suffered

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread Ian Eure
No... This is not the problem. As I said, X crashed. This makes the X server quit without restoring the display, so you just get your X desktop sitting there. You can restart X remotely, but when you exit, it restores the previous mode, eg a graphical mode instead of a text console. When I close my

Re: ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-16 Thread Ian Eure
Don't think a "reset" will do it, as that just manipulates the terminal behaviours... I'll give it a shot anyways in a minute though. As for the ``shutdown -r now'', I know that I can reboot the system and be fine, I just want to fix this without doing that, as I stated in the last sentence of my

ACK! Help me restore my console!

1998-09-15 Thread Ian Eure
Ok. Interesting thing happened. Accidentally killed my X server remotely with -9. Oops. I come back down to the console and it's all FUBARd. OK. So I try a couple things ssh'ing from another box, like SVGATextMode & such. No dice. I can get X running, but my text console is dead. Anyone have any su

ACK! xdm & kdm hate me!

1998-07-09 Thread Ian Eure
Ok, this problem is driving me crazy. The short story is that the drive that my /usr partition lived on died. This left me without many important binaries, and a package database which did not accurately reflect the state of the filesystem. So, after many days of manually downloading and re-install

Re: ACK! file ownership screwup!

1998-06-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"sjc" == sjc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: sjc> That is it SO FAR. I am wondering if anyone has any advise? sjc> Would it be possible for a few people to give me an ls -lR of /usr /var sjc> /etc /boot /dev /bin /sbin ? sjc> (ahd whetever else could be helpfull...but I think I got em all..

Re: ACK! file ownership screwup!

1998-06-28 Thread Jaakko Niemi
>> >> --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> >> Ok now I pulled a "Good One". >> My hard dirve "died" 2 days ago...it was at 3 am...so I went to bed=20 >> The next day I boguht a new drive on my way home from work (just s

ACK! file ownership screwup!

1998-06-28 Thread sjc
Ok now I pulled a "Good One". My hard dirve "died" 2 days ago...it was at 3 am...so I went to bed The next day I boguht a new drive on my way home from work (just slightly larger one) My thought was to restore form my month old backups and be done with it... to my surprize the old drive worked ag

Re: ACK! SCSI Not WOrking

1998-04-30 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote: [ snip ] : I don't have the manual for the card but... http://www.adaptec.com/support/overview/scsiha.html - you should be able to figure out how to find the manual from there. : if I look at the board itself i see jumpers (yes jumpers...I LOVE jumper

Re: ACK! SCSI Not WOrking

1998-04-30 Thread Mark Ciciretti
Try setting the jumper to set the address to 340. I have an Adaptec 1522, which is basicaly the same card but with floppy support. This is the message I get from dmesg: aha152x: BIOS test: passed, auto configuration: ok, detected 1 controller(s) aha152x0: vital data: PORTBASE=0x340, IRQ=11, SCSI

Re: ACK! SCSI Not WOrking

1998-04-30 Thread Stephen Carpenter
> > You can ping your node, you can ping you neighbor, but you can't ping your > neighbors node. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Stephen Carpenter > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 9

RE: ACK! SCSI Not WOrking

1998-04-30 Thread Patrick Ouellette
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Stephen Carpenter > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 9:37 PM > To: debian-user list > Subject: ACK! SCSI Not WOrking > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > I got my SCSI tape drive and I installed a SCSI car

ACK! SCSI Not WOrking

1998-04-30 Thread Stephen Carpenter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I got my SCSI tape drive and I installed a SCSI card I had lying around unfortunatly it didn't work :( I THINK the problem may be the controller... I get the messages: aha152x: processing commandline: ok aha152x: BIOS test: passed, detected 1 controller(s) aha152

Ack crash!

1997-10-04 Thread Udjat the BitMeister...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Got this error yesterday, It filled the console and the machine was frozen: Oct 3 16:00:04 bitgate kernel: Problem: block on freelist at 00497210 isn't free. I booted to a resq partition and e2fsck the disk (a few errors 1 major one) and remade the swap part

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-19 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
> > > > > I now have *absolutely* no idea why this is working. What I found from > > diddling is: > > > > with XF86Setup, and the SVGA server, i could get into x--at 320x200 > > (240?). > > > > with xf86config, i couldn't get a working setup sor the S3; > > generally the fixed font error. switch

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-19 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote: > > dwarf wrote, > > > > > > > _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111 > > > giving up. > > > xinit: Connection refused (errno 111): unable to connect to X server > > > xinit: No such process (errno 3): Server error. > > > I can help

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-18 Thread Rick Hawkins
dwarf wrote, > > > > _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111 > > giving up. > > xinit: Connection refused (errno 111): unable to connect to X server > > xinit: No such process (errno 3): Server error. > I can help you with this last one. The base system doesn't create the > d

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-18 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote: > > I got X going by using XF86Setup. Initially, when done, it ran > xvidtune. Now, no such luck. I ultimately ended up removing all of the > xpackages and reinstalling, but still no. It seems to be unhappy about > a missing default font. > > here's t

RE: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-18 Thread David Puryear
Hi Rick, On 17-Jun-97 You wrote: I got X going by using XF86Setup. Initially, when done, it ran xvidtune. Now, no such luck. I ultimately ended up removing all of the xpackages and reinstalling, but still no. It seems to be unhappy about a missing default font. Did you save the XF8

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-18 Thread Britton
> I got X going by using XF86Setup. Initially, when done, it ran > xvidtune. Now, no such luck. I ultimately ended up removing all of the > xpackages and reinstalling, but still no. It seems to be unhappy about > a missing default font. I too have been wrestling with configuration of X of lat

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-18 Thread Ciccio
> > I got X going by using XF86Setup. Initially, when done, it ran > xvidtune. Now, no such luck. I ultimately ended up removing all of the > xpackages and reinstalling, but still no. It seems to be unhappy about > a missing default font. > try using mkfontdir on the listed dirs. -- Ciccio

Re: ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-18 Thread Alexandre Lebrun
For the fonts, you need at least xfntbase, and xfnt75 is probably necessary, too. For the video modes, I think there is no problem. Xfree 3.3 seems to give much more choice than before. look at your /etc/X11/XF86Config file. Some modes are for low-end hardware, others for 21" (or 25") or bigger

ack! x has been hosed

1997-06-17 Thread Rick Hawkins
I got X going by using XF86Setup. Initially, when done, it ran xvidtune. Now, no such luck. I ultimately ended up removing all of the xpackages and reinstalling, but still no. It seems to be unhappy about a missing default font. here's the output from startx: XFree86 Version 3.2 / X Window

ack, never mind

1997-06-14 Thread J. LILLIBRIDGE
Sorry, I figured it out. Just needed to upgrade dpkg. joe -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .