Re: About apt-get dist-upgrade

2001-01-29 Thread kmself
on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:46:45PM -0600, Rogelio E. Castillo Haro,,, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi! > > I use Debian since some months ago (potato). > I did upgrade my box with apt-get dist-upgrade some times. > But the last three or for seems like is nothing to upgrade exception > from spide

Re: About apt-get dist-upgrade

2001-01-27 Thread Ray Percival
I agree the ,helixcode stuff needs to be unstable, for everything else you will be much better in the long run if you track one thing and going by stable testing or unstable is better IMHO because when a new version goes stable you will then get that without having to mess with your sources. Also k

Re: About apt-get dist-upgrade

2001-01-27 Thread will trillich
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:46:45PM -0600, Rogelio E. Castillo Haro,,, wrote: > Hi! > > I use Debian since some months ago (potato). > I did upgrade my box with apt-get dist-upgrade some times. > But the last three or for seems like is nothing to upgrade exception > from spidermonkey (gnome), so,

About apt-get dist-upgrade

2001-01-26 Thread Rogelio E. Castillo Haro,,,
Hi! I use Debian since some months ago (potato). I did upgrade my box with apt-get dist-upgrade some times. But the last three or for seems like is nothing to upgrade exception from spidermonkey (gnome), so, It's better that I change my source.lists to woody, or to another server? Those are m