On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:57:15 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> Yes, in the majority of cases. But there are probably a good number
> of false positives. One common pattern is the following: RC bug
> #nn is reported against package foo in version x.y.z (which may
> or may not be in stable). Th
On 2008-12-25 20:07 +0100, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Every now and then I take a look at the Release-critical bugs status
> page and I have a question. Since the release of Etch, in addition to
> showing bug counts for the 'next stable release' and total counts they
> have also displayed a line for t
On Thu,25.Dec.08, 11:07:39, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> What does this really mean? Obviously, Etch *has* been released.
> Apparently it has many release critical bugs. Are these bugs that
> have been found since Etch's release that would have been considered
> release critical if they had been fo
Every now and then I take a look at the Release-critical bugs status
page and I have a question. Since the release of Etch, in addition to
showing bug counts for the 'next stable release' and total counts they
have also displayed a line for the current release. This has, for the
past year, sh
4 matches
Mail list logo
