On Tue 08 Sep 2020 at 14:29:02 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-09-08 03:45, nenu crok wrote:
> > i have read somewhere using ctrl alt f2 option to start new session. is
> > word session correct ? by jumping using above option will log out from
> > existing session.
>
> That sounds l
On Tue 08 Sep 2020 at 14:29:02 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-09-08 03:45, nenu crok wrote:
> > i have read somewhere using ctrl alt f2 option to start new session. is
> > word session correct ? by jumping using above option will log out from
> > existing session.
>
> That sounds l
> i am privacy freak, hence not using android. however, after seeing size of
> libreoffice, is there any way an option to download only small portion. i
> have overheard aboout similar option in our os debian. this is must, only
> metered ethernet or wifi connections in my area. i am specifical
On 2020-09-08 15:04, Charles Curley wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:48:03 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
I added an alias to my .profile so that --no-install-recommends is
always set:
2020-09-08 13:45:56 root@tinkywinky ~
# grep 'no-install-recommends' .profile*
.profile:alias apt-get='apt-get -
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:48:03 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> I added an alias to my .profile so that --no-install-recommends is
> always set:
>
> 2020-09-08 13:45:56 root@tinkywinky ~
> # grep 'no-install-recommends' .profile*
> .profile:alias apt-get='apt-get --no-install-recommends'
You may
On 2020-09-08 03:45, nenu crok wrote:
hello debian users,
Hello. :-)
after bit of research, i have decided to install debian. it is rock solid.
i have few queries. please be simple. english is not my native language.
i assumed kernel is most important for system security. do we have tweak
On 2020-09-08 10:27, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:41 +
nenu crok wrote:
i am privacy freak, hence not using android. however, after seeing size of
libreoffice, is there any way an option to download only small portion. i have
overheard aboout similar option in our os
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:41 +
nenu crok wrote:
> i am privacy freak, hence not using android. however, after seeing size of
> libreoffice, is there any way an option to download only small portion. i
> have overheard aboout similar option in our os debian. this is must, only
> metered ethe
On 9/8/20, nenu crok wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:41 +
> nenu crok wrote:
>
>> after seeing size of libreoffice, is there any way an option to
>> download only small portion.
>
>> Consider other office software instead: ABIword, gnumeric, etc.
I always recommend AbiWord: it's not just m
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:41 +
nenu crok wrote:
> after seeing size of libreoffice, is there any way an option to
> download only small portion.
> Consider other office software instead: ABIword, gnumeric, etc.
i will certainly consider your suggestion.
_ nenu
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:41 +
nenu crok wrote:
> after seeing size of libreoffice, is there any way an option to
> download only small portion.
Consider other office software instead: ABIword, gnumeric, etc.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charl
nenu crok wrote:
> i have few queries. please be simple. english is not my native language.
That's true for lots of people here.
> i assumed kernel is most important for system security. do we have tweaked
> kernel packages. i dont mind a little of sluggishness or loss of performance.
The ker
hello debian users,
after bit of research, i have decided to install debian. it is rock solid.
i have few queries. please be simple. english is not my native language.
i assumed kernel is most important for system security. do we have tweaked
kernel packages. i dont mind a little of sluggishnes
On Friday 08 June 2018 16:18:36 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 02:05:45PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 08 June 2018 10:44:32 Dejan Jocic wrote:
> > > On 08-06-18, stuv wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'm using a debian derivate of linux and i'm searchin
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 02:05:45PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 08 June 2018 10:44:32 Dejan Jocic wrote:
>
> > On 08-06-18, stuv wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm using a debian derivate of linux and i'm searching for a way to
> > > make permanent changes to the kern
On Friday 08 June 2018 10:44:32 Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 08-06-18, stuv wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm using a debian derivate of linux and i'm searching for a way to
> > make permanent changes to the kernel boot parameters without GRUB or
> > any other boot loader, i want to disable ipv6 perm
On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 16:14:39 +0200
stuv wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using a debian derivate of linux and i'm searching for a way to
> make permanent changes to the kernel boot parameters without GRUB or
> any other boot loader, i want to disable ipv6 permanently, when i do it
> over /init.d/mo
On 08-06-18, stuv wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using a debian derivate of linux and i'm searching for a way to
> make permanent changes to the kernel boot parameters without GRUB or
> any other boot loader, i want to disable ipv6 permanently, when i do it
> over /init.d/modprobe.d the changes onl
Hi everyone,
I'm using a debian derivate of linux and i'm searching for a way to
make permanent changes to the kernel boot parameters without GRUB or
any other boot loader, i want to disable ipv6 permanently, when i do it
over /init.d/modprobe.d the changes only last until the next reboot.
best r
On 2010-02-18 02:21 +0100, Clive McBarton wrote:
> Why does the current major update (kernel even!) not show up on
> http://www.debian.org/security/ ? Nor does it show up in the list
> "Security Advisories from 2010" http://www.debian.org/security/2010/ . I
> had to go to http://lists.debian.org/d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why does the current major update (kernel even!) not show up on
http://www.debian.org/security/ ? Nor does it show up in the list
"Security Advisories from 2010" http://www.debian.org/security/2010/ . I
had to go to http://lists.debian.org/debian-secur
Hi,
You can use the option --revision in make-kpkg
(make-kpkg --initrd --revision 1.0 kernel_image)
or you can change the default in file /etc/kernel-pkg.conf to 1.0
so everytime you give make-kpkg the revision is always want you want.
Bye
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello Miguel,
if you are using make-kpkg ,
you may try the option `--revision'
hth,
Jerome
Miguel J. Jiménez wrote:
Hi... I am testing self made kernels on my desktop, using the debian way
found in http://www.howtoforge.com... My question is about the name
given to the deb package generated..
Hi... I am testing self made kernels on my desktop, using the debian way
found in http://www.howtoforge.com... My question is about the name
given to the deb package generated... How can I change the string
"-10.00.Custom_i386" in the package name? I am running debian
"testing/lenny". Thanks a
On 08/28/2007 02:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:15:08 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
> >> debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched
Quoting "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would one
need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when building a
custom kernel?
It's already p
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when
building a custom kernel?
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpl
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of debian
patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would one need to
patch it with all of the included debian patches when building a custom
kernel?
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
A
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:11:08 +0200
Marcus Blumhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
> this list.
>
> > [...]
> > And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
> > decompress tar/bz2 files .
> > [...]
Hi,
First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
this list.
> [...]
> And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
> decompress tar/bz2 files .
> [...]
I just wanted to add my ¢2. You may want to evaluate the package named
"unp" and you will never
Ed Jabbour([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > >Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
> >
> > I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
> > heard of " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area".
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
>
> I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
> heard of " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area". Just what readme did you
> see _that_ in?
From linux-source-2.6.1
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:36:52 +0900
Takehiko Abe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> >>> Well, I always store there all the sources related with my
> >>> kernel, modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW,
> >>> remember doing the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your
>
El Mar, 14 de Agosto de 2007, 8:29 pm, Frank McCormick escribió:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
>> Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Frank McCormick wrote:
>> > > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
>> > > which aptitude dumped into /usr
Frank McCormick wrote:
>>> Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
>>> modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing
>>> the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
>>
>> Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
>> t
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Frank McCormick wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of
the first
Frank McCormick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
> > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
> > > > which aptitude dumped into
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
> Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
> > > which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of
> > > the first things it says is " D
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for
> > my Quadro-pro card...
> > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
> > a
Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
> I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
> Quadro-pro card...
> I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
> aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
> things it says is " DO NOT USE TH
I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
Quadro-pro card...
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
things it says is " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area" because that is
whe
Hi,
A couple of kernel configuration options about which I can't find
sufficient documentation:
Device drivers/Real time clock - How can I determine which modules I
need and which chipset I have? My current kernel is only loading 'rtc';
I see the various modules have names like 'rtc-v3020'.
Devi
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:32:22 +0800, NetSnake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all
> I compile kernel-source 2.6.6 on Debian, but it seems non NPTL support.
> I compile kernel-source-2.6.6, glibc6 2.3.2-ds1-16, glibc-i686 2.3.2-ds1-16
> glibc6-dev-2.3.2-ds1-16
> On a machine the NPTL works fine!
Hi, all
I compile kernel-source 2.6.6 on Debian, but it seems non NPTL support.
I compile kernel-source-2.6.6, glibc6 2.3.2-ds1-16, glibc-i686
2.3.2-ds1-16 glibc6-dev-2.3.2-ds1-16
On a machine the NPTL works fine!
But on another machine, the same kernel(I tried same kernel config and
same binar
Bill Moseley wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
do_clean := NO
to your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
Then, it won't clean the tree prior to starting a make. Now you can do
it the Debian way and not worry about wasting too much time.
Well, that will be a huge help! I s
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> do_clean := NO
>
> to your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
>
> Then, it won't clean the tree prior to starting a make. Now you can do
> it the Debian way and not worry about wasting too much time.
Well, that will be a huge help! I suspect
Bill Moseley wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:20:06PM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
It is maybe harder in the beginning, but once you get used to it is
really easier in my opinion. Why? Because you can easily go back to
previously built kernels; you still have the .debs in /usr/src, so it
makes it rathe
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:20:06PM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> It is maybe harder in the beginning, but once you get used to it is
> really easier in my opinion. Why? Because you can easily go back to
> previously built kernels; you still have the .debs in /usr/src, so it
> makes it rather flexible.
j smith wrote:
thanks!
i read the Debian book, but it explicitly says:
"Note that you don't have to compile your kernel the
``Debian way''; but we find that using the packaging
system to manage your kernel is actually safer and
easier."
so i choose non-debian way. the correct command is
"make modul
j smith wrote:
> thanks!
>
> i read the Debian book, but it explicitly says:
>
> "Note that you don't have to compile your kernel the
> ``Debian way''; but we find that using the packaging
> system to manage your kernel is actually safer and
> easier."
>
> so i choose non-debian way. the correct
It is maybe harder in the beginning, but once you get used to it is
really easier in my opinion. Why? Because you can easily go back to
previously built kernels; you still have the .debs in /usr/src, so it
makes it rather flexible.
And yes, I've got xawtv running using 2.6.5 if I am correct (I am
i find it easier.
have you followed instruction in the Debian handbook
and installed kernel 2.6 and successfully run xawtv?
if so, i will have to try debian way, which i find
harder.
--- Pim Bliek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > i read the Debian book, but it explicitly says:
> >
> > "
Hi,
> i read the Debian book, but it explicitly says:
>
> "Note that you don't have to compile your kernel the
> ``Debian way''; but we find that using the packaging
> system to manage your kernel is actually safer and
> easier."
>
> so i choose non-debian way. the correct command is
Just out o
thanks!
i read the Debian book, but it explicitly says:
"Note that you don't have to compile your kernel the
``Debian way''; but we find that using the packaging
system to manage your kernel is actually safer and
easier."
so i choose non-debian way. the correct command is
"make modules_install",
First of all, you shouldn't be compiling kernels from source from
kernel.org unless you have a special reason for it and you what you
are doing.
Instead, you should be installing / compiling new kernels "the Debian
way", which is slightly different, but is quite cool once you get the
hang of it :)
i have Debian 2.6, Bt878-based TV card. i downloaded
kernel 2.6 from kernel.org, and compile it. when i
execute "make module_install", it complains. needless
to say, when i use the new kernel, it can't find bttv
driver. attached is .config, what's wrong?
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I have reaffirmed that I'm clueless this morning. I found this security
> bulletin:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2003/msg00212.html
>
> this morning. This worried me since I just installed debian last
I have reaffirmed that I'm clueless this morning. I found this security
bulletin:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2003/msg00212.html
this morning. This worried me since I just installed debian last week on
a server directly connecte
[Please don't top quote! It makes your message harder to read,
especially in long threads.]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:03:47PM +0100, Greg Bolshaw wrote:
> Vincent Dupont wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm staring with Debian and find the security updates very usefull with
> >apt-get
> >It's very comfort
The kernel doesn't get upgraded with an `apt-get upgrade`, it must be
done manually:
`apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4.18` (or whichever version you want).
Pick one, and `apt-get install` it. The lilo entry for the current
kernel will be renamed "LinuxOLD", and a "Linux" entry created for the
Hi,
I'm staring with Debian and find the security updates very usefull with
apt-get
It's very comfortable to keep one's packages up to date
But what happens when a package update concerns the Kernel? Should the
kernel be re-compiled or not?? is it automatically re-compiled?
Vincent
--
To UNSUB
Hi !
I marked the Realtek 8139 and the VIA Rhine in menuconfig and everything
works fine now.
eth0 became eth1 and vice versa but that's not a problem.
Thank you all.
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jocahim,
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
--- Joachim Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
I have 2 controllers, 1 is on board and the other a PCI controller, not a
3com. I will try it again WITH support for 3com.
Kind regards,
Joachim Smit
What onboard controller (chipset) do you have?
-Rober
--- Joachim Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I have 2 controllers, 1 is on board and the other a PCI controller, not a
> 3com. I will try it again WITH support for 3com.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Joachim Smit
What onboard controller (chipset) do you have?
-Roberto
_
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 18:13:55 +0200
"Joachim Smit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I did: (according to documentation from www.debian.org)
Try this:
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
In the kernel configuration, you need to include support for both your
onboard co
>
> When you went into menuconfig, did you enable support for the 3com NIC
> specifically (either as a module or as a compiled in feature)? If not,
> that could be the problem.
>
In menuconfig, I enabled support for:
Network device support -> Ethernet 10 or 100 Mbit -> EISA, VLB, PCI and on
boar
--- Joachim Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> >
> >
> > did u make a "make modules && make modules install" ???
> >
>
> This is what I did: (according to documentation from www.debian.org)
>
> login root
> apt-get install gcc kernel-package kernel-source-2.4.18 libc6-dev tk8.3
> libncurses5-
>
>
> did u make a "make modules && make modules install" ???
>
This is what I did: (according to documentation from www.debian.org)
login root
apt-get install gcc kernel-package kernel-source-2.4.18 libc6-dev tk8.3
libncurses5-dev fakeroot
adduser joachim src
logout
login joachim
cd /usr/src
tar
- Original Message -
From: "Joachim Smit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Fw: Question about kernel upgrade
> > >
> > >I'm a newbie with Debian.
&
> >
> >I'm a newbie with Debian.
> >
> >I've upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20 to 2.4.18.
> >
> >After a reboot I was running the new kernel indeed, but my eth0 was gone.
> >
> >What did I do wrong ?
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >
> >Joachim Smit
>
> have you loaded the module for the NIC in modconf ??
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Joachim Smit
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 5:05 PM
>Subject: Question about kernel upgrade
>
>
>I'm a newbie with Debian.
>
>I've upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20 to 2.4.18.
>
>After
I'm a newbie with Debian.
I've upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20 to 2.4.18.
After a reboot I was running the new kernel indeed, but my eth0 was gone.
What did I do wrong ?
Thanks in advance.
Joachim Smit
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:50:38AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this is more "in the abstract" question.
> > I use a kernel 2.2.20 (compiled by myself, based on the debian woody
> > source package: kernel-source-2.2.20).
> > It works perfectly on my
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:50:38AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
> this is more "in the abstract" question.
> I use a kernel 2.2.20 (compiled by myself, based on the debian woody
> source package: kernel-source-2.2.20).
> It works perfectly on my laptop.
> Is there any need to update the kernel
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:50:38AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
> this is more "in the abstract" question.
> I use a kernel 2.2.20 (compiled by myself, based on the debian woody
> source package: kernel-source-2.2.20).
> It works perfectly on my laptop.
> Is there any need to update the kernel
Hi,
this is more "in the abstract" question.
I use a kernel 2.2.20 (compiled by myself, based on the debian woody
source package: kernel-source-2.2.20).
It works perfectly on my laptop.
Is there any need to update the kernel in terms of security,
performance ... ?
Oliver
--
... don't touch the ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 January 2002 06:50 pm, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:53:00PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > ++
> >
> > | Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:53:00PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> ++
> | Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org |
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 January 2002 01:44 pm, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:26:24PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote (1.00):
> > So... anyone know what tsc means?
>
> Time Stamp Counter. An instruction was added in the Intel Pentium line
> called R
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:26:24PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote (1.00):
> So... anyone know what tsc means?
Time Stamp Counter. An instruction was added in the Intel Pentium line
called RDTSC, which you can use for high resolution timing, performance
monitoring, etc.
>From what I can tell, if you h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 January 2002 01:13 pm, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Quoting Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > kernel-image-2.4.17-586tsc
> > What does the tsc stand for?
>
> I don't know for sure wat 'tsc' stands for, but additional "version
> information"
Quoting Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> kernel-image-2.4.17-586tsc
> What does the tsc stand for?
I don't know for sure wat 'tsc' stands for, but additional "version
information" tells you what options are compiled in the kernel or what
patches are used to create the kernel. Like this:
2.4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
kernel-image-2.4.17-586tsc
What does the tsc stand for?
Thanks
- --
++
| Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.o
HELP, PLEASE HELP!!!
Hackers have put my user id into
multiple redistributing lists of your technical forum.
I can't unsubcribe with automated system because
my user id is not in the main list.
Please help. I received tons of unwanted mails.
Please forward this request to the list owner.
Thanks
-
Hi,
On Monday 03 December 2001 2:02 pm, Daniel Freedman wrote:
> > Is there any way to know that, for examples, my kernel-images have quota
> > support enabled? In this case, consider I am using kernel-images from
> > .deb, not compile it myself. Of course many configuration I need to know
> > be
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001, Bambang Purnomosidi D. P. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to know that, for examples, my kernel-images have quota
> support enabled? In this case, consider I am using kernel-images from .deb,
> not compile it myself. Of course many configuration I need to know beside
Hi,
Is there any way to know that, for examples, my kernel-images have quota
support enabled? In this case, consider I am using kernel-images from .deb,
not compile it myself. Of course many configuration I need to know beside
quota support.
TIA
--
bpdp
Thanks, everyone. I've printed out all the replies and will try
compiling the kernel.
Peter
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:41:18PM -0400, Peter Christensen wrote:
> I'm still learning Debian-Linux, was so pleased that apt-get worked. It
> took 12 hours (!), but afterward Mozilla was finally working, so now I
> have internet access.
>
> After the apt-get dist-upgrade I got a message saying t
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:41:18PM -0400, Peter Christensen wrote:
> I'm still learning Debian-Linux, was so pleased that apt-get worked. It
> took 12 hours (!), but afterward Mozilla was finally working, so now I
> have internet access.
>
> After the apt-get dist-upgrade I got a message saying t
Thus spake Peter Christensen:
> I'm still learning Debian-Linux, was so pleased that apt-get worked. It
> took 12 hours (!), but afterward Mozilla was finally working, so now I
> have internet access.
>
> After the apt-get dist-upgrade I got a message saying that I must
> upgrade the kernel. Cur
* Peter Christensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm still learning Debian-Linux, was so pleased that apt-get worked. It
> took 12 hours (!), but afterward Mozilla was finally working, so now I
> have internet access.
>
> After the apt-get dist-upgrade I got a message saying that I must
> upgrade
I'm still learning Debian-Linux, was so pleased that apt-get worked. It
took 12 hours (!), but afterward Mozilla was finally working, so now I
have internet access.
After the apt-get dist-upgrade I got a message saying that I must
upgrade the kernel. Current is 2.0.36, need at least 2.2.12.
Com
Hello.
I'm Marco and I would like to join the Debian world :), and in the while
I'm collecting some informations.
I have a question (much more a curiosity) about the kernel provided by
Debian.
I know taht many distributions (as RedHat for example) use to patch the
kernel in their distribution, in
Recently I upgraded most of my machines from the version of
kernel-package that came with hamm to 6.05.
Now when I build kernel source packages, instead of the kernel-source
package unrolling to /usr/src/kernel-source-x.x.x it just creates
/usr/src/kernel-source-x.x.x.tar.gz.
The make-kpkg man
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
> Yes. There is the new 'nestea' attack ... linux is linux,
> regardless of distribution. In other words, debian is definately
> vulnerable, there are patches available. I forgot exactly where I got
> mine, (sorry), but it is something like ip_f
Yes. There is the new 'nestea' attack ... linux is linux, regardless of
distribution. In other words, debian is definately vulnerable, there are
patches available. I forgot exactly where I got mine, (sorry), but it is
something like ip_fragment.c and you throw it into your kernel source
Hi!
A lot of the people here are running RH linux, and this morning all of 'em
crashed. RH seems to have a patch available, Debian doesn't.
Question: is Debian vulnerable for this?
-Maarten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
