Hi everybody.
Those of you who use commercial X servers might have already encountered
problem with gziped fonts supplied with Xfree86-3.3.
The root of the problem is your server most probably can't handle gziped
font files (with .gz suffix) but it CAN handle _compressed_ font files
(with .Z suf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
If I just uncompressed the fonts, would the server run faster?
- -Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQB1AwUBM+ViN/MRUhbnJu3lAQE3owMAmQZT9u4Bf5um8Zv+kSwIw8vMVqslixf8
dshWl4GvBf1hybfNvQQY+ZwAY+SMRYARq1RB2bu8FKgYe1s3J+Y1pA0EEo5oeL
> If I just uncompressed the fonts, would the server run faster?
>
> -Paul
Having fonts comressed will increase CPU load when application requests
font not in server's cache (usually at startup). But uncompression takes
_much_ less time than compression and even on 386SX uncompression of a
single
Hi,
Actually, for older IDE drives, uncompressing the fonts on a
fast machine may make the machine run slower, since the font maybe
uncompressed by the CPU faster than the extra uncompressed data can
be read off the disks.
manoj
--
"Whenever 'A' attempts by law to impose his
4 matches
Mail list logo