Arcady Genkin wrote:
> | PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
> | PIIX4: chipset revision 1
> | ...
> | hdc: IBM-DTLA-307030, 29314MB w/1916kB Cache, CHS=59560/16/63, UDMA(100)
> `
>
> Thanks!!!
cool! glad it works :)
>
> The only question is whether I used the right patch. There se
Nate Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ,[ dmesg ]
> > | PCI_IDE: unknown IDE controller on PCI bus 00 device f9, VID=8086,
> > DID=244b
> > | PCI_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
>
> looks like the system doesn't know what kind of controller it is
> try patching from www
On 07 Jan 2001 03:58:45 -0500, Arcady Genkin said:
> I have an IBM ATA-100 30G harddrive, attached to a ASUS CUSL2-C (Intel
> 815EP-based) mobo.
>
> The kernel is not even using the drive in UDMA mode. The performance
> is *horrible*: every time I copy to the disk the CPU usage goes up all
Arcady Genkin wrote:
>
> I have an IBM ATA-100 30G harddrive, attached to a ASUS CUSL2-C (Intel
> 815EP-based) mobo.
>
> The kernel is not even using the drive in UDMA mode. The performance
> is *horrible*: every time I copy to the disk the CPU usage goes up all
> the way and I'm seeing things l
I have an IBM ATA-100 30G harddrive, attached to a ASUS CUSL2-C (Intel
815EP-based) mobo.
The kernel is not even using the drive in UDMA mode. The performance
is *horrible*: every time I copy to the disk the CPU usage goes up all
the way and I'm seeing things like "load average: 5.47, 5.02, 3.27"
5 matches
Mail list logo
