On 12/11/23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> 1) Many implementations of echo will interpret parts of their argument(s),
>in addition to processing options like -n. If you want to print a
>variable's contents to standard output without *any* interpretation,
>use printf.
>
> printf %s "$myva
ot;${ftype}" | tr --complement --squeeze-repeats
> '[A-Za-z0-9.]' '_');
> echo "// __ \$ftype2: |${ftype2}|"
> ftype2len=${#ftype2}
> echo "// __ \$ftype2len: |${ftype2len}|"
>
> lbrtchx
Short answer. tr doesn't append anything. echo does output a linefeed
at the end of the string, unless you stop it. tr dutifully translates
that to an underscore.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:16:35AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > 1) Many implementations of echo will interpret parts of their argument(s),
> >in addition to processing options like -n. If you want to print a
> >variable's contents to standard output without *any* interpretation,
> >
> 1) Many implementations of echo will interpret parts of their argument(s),
>in addition to processing options like -n. If you want to print a
>variable's contents to standard output without *any* interpretation,
>use printf.
>
> printf %s "$myvar"
> printf '%s\n' "$myvar"
In
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:55:54AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
Greg, your analyses are always impressive. And enjoyable.
Thanks for this
cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:00:49PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Ach, yes! I forgot echo by default appends a new line character at
> the end of every string it spits out. In order to suppress it you need
> to use the "n" option: "echo -n ..."
>
> _FL_TYPE=" abc á é í ó ú ü ñ Á É Í Ó Ú Ü Ñ
On 11/12/2023 21:00, Albretch Mueller wrote:
// __ $_FL_TYPE: |abc á é í ó ú ü ñ Á É Í Ó Ú Ü Ñ 123 birdie🐦here ¿ ¡
§ ASCII ä ö ü ß Ä Ö Ü Text|
// __ $_FL_TYPE:|abc_123_birdie_here_ASCII_Text|
https://pypi.org/project/Unidecode/
should be more friendly to languages other than English.
Ach, yes! I forgot echo by default appends a new line character at
the end of every string it spits out. In order to suppress it you need
to use the "n" option: "echo -n ..."
_FL_TYPE=" abc á é í ó ú ü ñ Á É Í Ó Ú Ü Ñ 123 birdie🐦here ¿ ¡ §
ASCII ä ö ü ß Ä Ö Ü Text"
echo "// __ \$_FL_TYPE:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:11:46PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:42:10AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Looks like GNU tr in Debian 12 still doesn't handle multibyte characters
> > correctly:
> >
> > unicorn:~$ echo 'mañana' | tr ñ X
> > maXXana
>
> Hey, you
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:42:10AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:37:42AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > 2. This is tr, not regexp, so '[A-Za-z0-9.]' isn't doing what you
> >think it does. It will match '[', 'A' to 'Z', 'a' to 'z','.' and
> >']'. I guess you w
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:37:42AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> 2. This is tr, not regexp, so '[A-Za-z0-9.]' isn't doing what you
>think it does. It will match '[', 'A' to 'Z', 'a' to 'z','.' and
>']'. I guess you want to say 'A-Za-z0-9.'
Well spotted.
> 3. As a convenience, tr has
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:25:13AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> In the case of: "ASCII text"
> what should come out of it is: "ASCII_text"
> not: "ASCII_text_"
> no underscore at the end. That is the question I have.
OK, here's my guess.
The lines of code that you showed us are not actuall
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:25:13AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> "tr --complement --squeeze-repeats ..." makes sure that the replaced
> characters only appear once (that it doesn't immediately repeat). Say
> you have something like " " (two spaces) or "?$|" (three characters)
> which will be r
"tr --complement --squeeze-repeats ..." makes sure that the replaced
characters only appear once (that it doesn't immediately repeat). Say
you have something like " " (two spaces) or "?$|" (three characters)
which will be replaced by just an underscore.
In the case of: "ASCII text"
what should
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:04:06AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 12/11/23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Please tell us ...
>
> OK, here is what I did as a t-table
[...]
Your style is confusing, to say the least. Why not play with minimal
examples and work your way up from that?
> the two st
On 12/11/23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Please tell us ...
OK, here is what I did as a t-table
echo "abc123" > file.txt # obvious text file
ftype=$(file --brief file.txt) # got its type as reported by the "file" utility
echo "// __ \$ftype: |${ftype}|"
ftypelen=${#ftype} # length of the string c
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:53:07AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> echo "abc123" > file.txt
> ftype=$(file --brief file.txt)
> echo "// __ \$ftype: |${ftype}|"
> ftypelen=${#ftype}
> echo "// __ \$ftypelen: |${ftypelen}|"
>
> # removing spaces ...
> ftype2=$(echo "${ftype}" | tr --complement --sq
echo "abc123" > file.txt
ftype=$(file --brief file.txt)
echo "// __ \$ftype: |${ftype}|"
ftypelen=${#ftype}
echo "// __ \$ftypelen: |${ftypelen}|"
# removing spaces ...
ftype2=$(echo "${ftype}" | tr --complement --squeeze-repeats
'[A-Za-z0-9.]' '_');
echo "// __ \$ftype2: |${ftype2}|"
ftype2len=${
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 07:16:25PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It's a target in the Linux Makefile that produces a linux-image (and
> linux-headers, linux-libc-dev) Debian package, see
> scripts/package/builddeb in the Linux source tree.
Thanks for the explanation: I haven't built a custom kernel
On 2013-04-17 18:04 +0200, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> What is deb-pkg or where did you get it from? I couldn't find any such binary
> name in any package in Debian via a search at packages.debian.org.
It's a target in the Linux Makefile that produces a linux-image (and
linux-headers, linux-libc-de
What is deb-pkg or where did you get it from? I couldn't find any such binary
name in any package in Debian via a search at packages.debian.org.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
Well thanks for your answer but not at all since my question was
concerning the command make deb-pkg and not make-kpkg for which I simply
uses --append-to-version
Regards
2013/4/17 Jaikumar Sharma
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Laurent Debian
> wrote:
>
>> tes
> erasing the previous one.
> Ideally I am searching for the exact equivalent of append-to-version with
> make-kpkg. But anything which allows me to distinguish each compiled
> version would be fine.
> Any tips ?
> PS : probably out there but didn't find it sorry
>
I'
nt of append-to-version with
make-kpkg. But anything which allows me to distinguish each compiled
version would be fine.
Any tips ?
PS : probably out there but didn't find it sorry
Hi,
Somehow my ncftpput upload session always ends up as appending to
existing files instead of overwriting them.
I searched its man pages, and it seems that there is only one related
option, the -A, which turns *on* append mode, not off, which I never use.
Any way for ncftpput to be in
>>> Open Cinelerra, [...]
Yes, now I can render a project into a video file. But still can't play it
with Mplayer.
Rodolfo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
"thveillon.debian" writes:
>>> Open Cinelerra,
>>> load your video, put the cursor
>>>
>>> [...]
Thanks indeed. But the crazy thing is, that cinelerra does not render
*anything*, i.e. no file at all is written on the disk! I do `Edit > Select
all', then Render, put a filename with a path, cli
Rodolfo Medina wrote :
> Thanks for your help, Tom and Florian.
>
> About openmovieeditor, `apt-get install' in sid gives the following output:
>
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading
Thanks for your help, Tom and Florian.
About openmovieeditor, `apt-get install' in sid gives the following output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages
thveillon.debian wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote :
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 19:52:43 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
How do I install cinelerra? I did many attempts with different entries in
sources.list, but either the package is `not found' or there are unmet
dependencies. What shall the proper entr
>Florian Kulzer wrote :
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 19:52:43 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> How do I install cinelerra? I did many attempts with different entries in
>> sources.list, but either the package is `not found' or there are unmet
>> dependencies. What shall the proper entries be in sour
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 19:52:43 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> How do I install cinelerra? I did many attempts with different entries in
> sources.list, but either the package is `not found' or there are unmet
> dependencies. What shall the proper entries be in sources.list?
AFAICT, cinelerra i
Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
>> My apologizes to the listers for coming back to the same question I put in
>> another thread, but I couldn't really solve the problem.
>>
>> I didn't get good results with Kino nor with the `cat' command.
>>
>> If anyone experienced directly that matter, his/her help'
Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> My apologizes to the listers for coming back to the same question I put in
> another thread, but I couldn't really solve the problem.
>
> I didn't get good results with Kino nor with the `cat' command.
>
> If anyone experienced directly that matter, his/her help's very
My apologizes to the listers for coming back to the same question I put in
another thread, but I couldn't really solve the problem.
I didn't get good results with Kino nor with the `cat' command.
If anyone experienced directly that matter, his/her help's very welcome.
Thanks
Rodolfo
--
To UNS
Fred J. wrote:
Hi
I just built a kernel based on the steps below and got this
linux-image-2.6.16.060919_2.6.16.060919-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
my quetion is why this "2.6.16.060919_2.6.16.060919" and not just
"2.6.16.060919"?
> linux-image-2.6.16.060919_2.6.16.060919-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
<---
KS escribe:
> ~/$ make-kpkg -rev Custom.060919 kernel_image
I use:
make-kpkg --revision `hostname`.`date +%Y%m%d`
Or I change `hostname` by a different hostname if I am targetting
different configuration options. Thus looking at package name it
reminds my why and when I compiled that kernel.
Co
Fred J. wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just built a kernel based on the steps below and got this
> linux-image-2.6.16.060919_2.6.16.060919-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
>
> my quetion is why this "2.6.16.060919_2.6.16.060919" and not just
> "2.6.16.060919"?
>From the debian docs(http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-kern
kpkg clean$ fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version=.060919 kernel_imageonce I fix this problem I will do $ cd ../$ su# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.16.060919_10.00.Custom_i386.deb# rm linux# cd /boot# mkboot /boot/vmlinuz-"new kernel"# dpkg -P kernel-image-"old kernel"
Ge
I use nautilus to write cdrom. after burn the cdrom have free space.
So the next time I use nautilus again to append data. but It is impossible.
How to write cdrom for append data again using nautilus.
Surachai
ome reason, I'm
> > having to do it over and over, and I'm running up against an annoying
> > feature of make-kpkg. If I try to change the "append-to-version"
> > value in the make-kpkg command after running make xconfig (to change
> > just a couple o
an annoying
> feature of make-kpkg. If I try to change the "append-to-version"
> value in the make-kpkg command after running make xconfig (to change
> just a couple of variables), make-kpkg exits with an error ("I thought
> we were building version x, but we seem to be
Hi,
I'm trying to compile processor-specific kernels for 2 machines, one
k7 and one pII. the compilation is difficult for some reason, I'm
having to do it over and over, and I'm running up against an annoying
feature of make-kpkg. If I try to change the "append-to-versio
Adam Hardy wrote:
> David A. Cobb on 09/09/05 02:41, wrote:
>
>> I have been trying various configurations building
>> LINUX-SOURCE-2.6.12 using make-kpkg.
>> To minimize avoidable errors, I run the whole make from a bash script.
>>
>> If I use --append-to
David A. Cobb on 09/09/05 02:41, wrote:
I have been trying various configurations building LINUX-SOURCE-2.6.12
using make-kpkg.
To minimize avoidable errors, I run the whole make from a bash script.
If I use --append-to-version "x6+p0c40" for example, the first build is
fine. Ho
I have been trying various configurations building LINUX-SOURCE-2.6.12
using make-kpkg.
To minimize avoidable errors, I run the whole make from a bash script.
If I use --append-to-version "x6+p0c40" for example, the first build is
fine. However, the appended codes get written int
I have been trying various configurations building LINUX-SOURCE-2.6.12
using make-kpkg.
To minimize avoidable errors, I run the whole make from a bash script.
If I use --append-to-version "x6+p0c40" for example, the first build is
fine. However, the appended codes get written int
From: Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:05:43PM -0500, Patrick
Albuquerque wrote:
> > From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date:
Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:49
> > am Subject: vi globally append question
> >
> > > hi all,
> > >
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:05:43PM -0500, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
> From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:49
> am Subject: vi globally append question
>
> > hi all,
> >
> > i have a file like;
> >
> > # one 123
> >
From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:49 am
Subject: vi globally append question
> hi all,
>
> i have a file like;
>
> #
> one
> 123
>
> and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of
> each line which is not started with a # .
t; > > one
> > > > 123
> > > >
> > > > and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of
> > > > each line which is not started with a # . how can i do
> > > > it with vi or ed, so far, i 've tried;
> > > >
> &g
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:45:26PM +0200, Matthias Czapla wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:05:32AM -0400, David Turetsky wrote:
> > > i have a file like;
> > >
> > > #
> > > one
> > > 123
> > >
> > > and i would like to APPEND
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:06:07PM -0400, David Turetsky wrote:
>
> David Turetsky wrote:
>
> >>:%s/^[a-z]:[0-9]/#/g
>
> > Try something like:
>
> > %g!/^#/s/^/#/
>
> > Steve Lamb replied:
>
> >Personally I'd do it this way:
> >%s/\(.*\)/#\1/g
>
> David responded:
>
> Steve's ap
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:05:32AM -0400, David Turetsky wrote:
> > i have a file like;
> >
> > #
> > one
> > 123
> >
> > and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of
> > each line which is not started with a # . how can i do
> > it
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 06:49:20 PDT, Sean writes:
>and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of
>each line which is not started with a # . how can i do
>it with vi or ed, so far, i 've tried;
>
>:%s/^[a-z]:[0-9]/#/g
>
>but this would CHANGE the first character of each
David Turetsky wrote:
> Steve's approach would put a # in the front of ALL
> lines whether or not they initially contain an existing
> # to begin with
Oh, uh, whoops. :) Well, at least he'd see the \(.*\) and \1 move the
text over and hopefully know to take the set he constructed, plac
David Turetsky wrote:
>>:%s/^[a-z]:[0-9]/#/g
> Try something like:
> %g!/^#/s/^/#/
> Steve Lamb replied:
>Personally I'd do it this way:
>%s/\(.*\)/#\1/g
David responded:
Steve's approach would put a # in the front of ALL
lines whether or not they initially contain an existi
David Turetsky wrote:
>>:%s/^[a-z]:[0-9]/#/g
> Try something like:
> %g!/^#/s/^/#/
Personally I'd do it this way:
%s/\(.*\)/#\1/g
I know there are more concise ways to do it but this at least shows why
the approach the OP took was not working.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:49 AM
> To: debian-user
> Subject: vi globally append question
>
> hi all,
>
> i have a file like;
>
> #
> one
> 123
>
> and i would like to APP
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:24:32AM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 06:49:20AM -0700, Sean wrote:
| > hi all,
| >
| > i have a file like;
| >
| > # one 123
| >
| > and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of each line
|
| 'append'
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 06:49:20AM -0700, Sean wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i have a file like;
>
> # one 123
>
> and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of each line
'append' means to add to the end. It is impossible to append to the
beginning of something.
hi all,
i have a file like;
#
one
123
and i would like to APPEND a # at the beginning of
each line which is not started with a # . how can i do
it with vi or ed, so far, i 've tried;
:%s/^[a-z]:[0-9]/#/g
but this would CHANGE the first character of each line
to a hash, pls help.
th
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 08:50:38 +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
Stephen and Colin, please excuse me for butting in but I can't stand it :)
Stephen,
You've fixed your lilo.conf, so you don't need to do anything more with it.
What Colin was showing you is how you can append more data th
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:50:38AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > You're missing a '>>', and as I said that isn't what you want in this
> > case anyway (since you probably don't want to make that the last line of
> > lilo.co
Hi Colin,
- snip -
> > # echo append="ide-scsi" /etc/lilo.conf
>
> You're missing a '>>', and as I said that isn't what you want in this
> case anyway (since you probably don't want to make that the last line of
> lilo.conf).
#
eally
> > want here.
>
> If I understand your advice correctly
>
> # echo append="ide-scsi" /etc/lilo.conf
You're missing a '>>', and as I said that isn't what you want in this
case anyway (since you probably don't want to make that
Hi Colin, Bill, Paul and others
Thanks for your advice.
å ææä 02 äæ 2004 20:54ïColin Watson åé:
> > I'm going to add following line to /etc/lilo.conf
> >
> > # append "hdc=ide-scsi" /etc/lilo.conf
> > bash: append: command not found
>
> You're
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 02:00:14 +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Hi all folks,
>
> Debian (testing/unstable)
>
> I could not find the "append" command
>
> # which append
> # whereis append
> had no printout
>
> I'm going to add following line
Yes there is, it is called cat. You can use it like this: $>cat file1
>>file2
Bill K
Grzesiek Sedek wrote:
Hey,
you should add:
append="hdc=ide-scsi"
and than run lilo
Grzesiek Sedek
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:00:14AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi all folks,
Debian (t
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:00:14AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Debian (testing/unstable)
>
> I could not find the "append" command
>
> # which append
> # whereis append
> had no printout
>
> I'm going to add following line to /etc/lilo.conf
>
Hi,
> A nice one :-)) It's not a command, it a verb:
>
> append
> v 1: add to the very end; "He appended a glossary to his novel
> where he used an invented language" [syn: {add on}, {supplement},
>{affix}]
I tried follows;
# append=
> A nice one :-)) It's not a command, it a verb:
Oops! Wrong! Check the correct explanation in another reply.
Didn't remember LILO uses such a thing, used LILO three times for
approximately 1 hour and escaped back to grub(8) every time.
--
Jan Minar "Please don't CC me, I'm
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:00:14AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> I could not find the "append" command
A nice one :-)) It's not a command, it a verb:
append
v 1: add to the very end; "He appended a glossary to his novel
where he used an invented
Hey,
you should add:
append="hdc=ide-scsi"
and than run lilo
Grzesiek Sedek
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:00:14AM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Hi all folks,
>
> Debian (testing/unstable)
>
> I could not find the "append" command
>
> # which appen
Hi all folks,
Debian (testing/unstable)
I could not find the "append" command
# which append
# whereis append
had no printout
I'm going to add following line to /etc/lilo.conf
# append "hdc=ide-scsi" /etc/lilo.conf
bash: append: command not found
# l
Lance Hoffmeyer said:
> I have finally got my promise ATA drivers working
> but I have to manually append the ide addresses at
> the boot prompt. I have tried using the append in
> lilo.conf but it does not work.
stupid question but did you run lilo after changing lilo.conf befo
I am trying to append ATA addresses to
lilo.conf, but to no avail.
# Kernel command line options that apply to all installed images go
# here. See: The `boot-prompt-HOWO' and `kernel-parameters.txt' in
# the Linux kernel `Documentation' directory.
#
append="ide1=0xbc00,0x
I have finally got my promise ATA drivers working
but I have to manually append the ide addresses at
the boot prompt. I have tried using the append in
lilo.conf but it does not work.
# Kernel command line options that apply to all installed images go
# here. See: The `boot-prompt-HOWO'
Solved.
It was a bounce message after my previous posting to debian-user that
caused the problem I mentioned with Evolution. It's all in bug 147855
if anybody wants to see it. http://bugs.debian.org/147855
--
James Cameron ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://quozl.l
G'day,
I've been happily using Evolution (1.0.3-1) on woody now for a month,
and it has just started not receiving mail from my /var/mail/me mbox
file.
When I press the Send/Receive button, an error message appears:
Error while 'Fetching Mail':
Cannot append message to
nd up
Chuck> in /lib/modules/2.4.17/ .
Did you remember to modify the top level Makefile (patches
that may work included in /usr/doc/kernel-package/FLAVOUR.gz)? The
--revision only affects the name of the kernel-image, and nothing on
the file system. This limitation (the required patch
Chuck Bearden wrote:
>
> I'm running Potato r4, with Adrian Bunk's packages to upgrade to a
> 2.4 kernel. I'm building a custom kernel with kernel-package, and
> I'd like to have the modules for my custom kernel land in a directory
> other than /lib/modules/2.4.17/ . Essentially, I'd like to emu
is list from 30 June 2001 speaks of an '--append-to-version'
argument to make-kpkg, but my make-kpkg doesn't recognize it.
Relevant packages:
kernel-image-2.4.17-586tsc_2.4.17-1_i386.deb
(installed & running)
kernel-source-2.4.17_2.4.17-0.bunk_all.deb
kernel-packag
Regarding your question as to where my parport is ,
It is pretty normal , not an additional fitting as far as I know.
Regards,
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Shyam
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne Topa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> As you suggested I gave the append entry :
> Image = /boot/kernel-2.4.9
> label = Woody-249
> Root= /dev/hda10
> VGA = 0x31A
> append = "hdd=cdrom lp=parport0 parpor
As you suggested I gave the append entry :
Image = /boot/kernel-2.4.9
label = Woody-249
Root= /dev/hda10
VGA = 0x31A
append = "hdd=cdrom lp=parport0 parport=0x378,none video=vesa"
(my lilo as installed looks slightly different but that hasn
package kernel-image-2.4.5 . He
> > does want as Joost suggests: --append-to-version=athlon , which will
> > result in something like
> > ../kernel-image-2.4.5athlon_Custom.1.00_i386.deb , which is a debian
> > package for kernel-image-2.4.5athlon , and will insert a
Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> Incorrect. Using --revision-number=custom.1.0 will result in a
> creation of ../kernel-image-2.4.5_custom.1.1_i386.deb . This is a
> different revision of the same debian package kernel-image-2.4.5 . He
> does want as Joost suggests: --append-to-version=athl
ost suggests: --append-to-version=athlon , which will
> result in something like
> ../kernel-image-2.4.5athlon_Custom.1.00_i386.deb , which is a debian
> package for kernel-image-2.4.5athlon , and will insert appropriately
> named files in /boot (i.e. vmlinuz-2.4.5athlon ,
> System
Incorrect. Using --revision-number=custom.1.0 will result in a
creation of ../kernel-image-2.4.5_custom.1.1_i386.deb . This is a
different revision of the same debian package kernel-image-2.4.5 . He
does want as Joost suggests: --append-to-version=athlon , which will
result in something like
ing at the moment) because I have xfs running on /,
>>> /home, and /var. I want to install both kernels for being able to switch
>>> all my hardware back to the pentium machine if something doesn't work. I
>>> tried to compile the athlon kernel with "--append-to-version a
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:22:02AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> >From zless /usr/doc/kernel-package/README.gz -
> make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
Nope, this does not make any differences to the filenames that are
installed by the package, which is what the original poster was after.
The --revi
> all my hardware back to the pentium machine if something doesn't work. I
> tried to compile the athlon kernel with "--append-to-version athlon" and
> I get the eroor message
>
> "dpkg-gencontrol: error: package kernel-image-2.4.3-xfsathlon not in
> control inf
r being able to switch
> all my hardware back to the pentium machine if something doesn't work. I
> tried to compile the athlon kernel with "--append-to-version athlon" and
> I get the eroor message
>
> "dpkg-gencontrol: error: package kernel-image-2.4.3-xfsathlon n
work. I
tried to compile the athlon kernel with "--append-to-version athlon" and
I get the eroor message
"dpkg-gencontrol: error: package kernel-image-2.4.3-xfsathlon not in
control info
make: *** [kernel-image-deb] Error 29"
Running without --append-to-version gives me a
I noticed you had an old March 1998 append about an "LRU Block List
corrupted" message on Linux. I too am getting this and haven't been able to
find a solution. Did you find one?
Thanks,
Wes J. Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.678-443-6111
Lazar Fleysher wrote:
> > > > Could some one tell me how to find if a given kernel release supports
> > > > certain append option. In particular, I am interested in
> > > > 2.0.36 supports ide-scsi option.
> >
> > I use 2.0.35 and it has it. I
> Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > HI all,
> > >
> > > Could some one tell me how to find if a given kernel release supports
> > > certain append option. In particular, I am interested in
> > > 2.0.36 supports ide-scsi option.
Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > HI all,
> >
> > Could some one tell me how to find if a given kernel release supports
> > certain append option. In particular, I am interested in
> > 2.0.36 supports ide-scsi option.
I use 2.0.35 and it has
Subject: kernel "append" options
Date: Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 10:54:13PM -0700
In reply to:Lazar Fleysher
Quoting Lazar Fleysher([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> HI all,
>
> Could some one tell me how to find if a given kernel release supports
> certain append optio
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
