Re: ACPI Problems [was: Re: Speeding up boot time]

2007-03-23 Thread Cassiano Leal
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Cassiano Leal wrote: I didn't have ACPI on in my BIOS. After activating it, dmesg shows ACPI supporting S0, S1, S2, S4, S5 and S6, but not S3. Is this a hardware/BIOS limitation, or can it be overcome in software? hardware/BIOS. What ma

Re: ACPI Problems [was: Re: Speeding up boot time]

2007-03-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Cassiano Leal wrote: > I didn't have ACPI on in my BIOS. After activating it, dmesg shows ACPI > supporting S0, S1, S2, S4, S5 and S6, but not S3. Is this a > hardware/BIOS limitation, or can it be overcome in software? hardware/BIOS. What machine is this? -- "One disk

ACPI Problems [was: Re: Speeding up boot time]

2007-03-23 Thread Cassiano Leal
Cassiano Leal wrote: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Cassiano Leal wrote: Just one thing, though... When I 'echo -n mem > /sys/power/state', it responds it can't write to the file. 'echo -n disk > /sys/power/state' works flawlessly, though. You are missing suspend-to-

Acpi problems after upgrade to 2.6.15: computer doesn't poweroff anymore.

2006-02-25 Thread Michelasso
Hello everybody, I have recently updated my kernel building a 2.6.15 one from debian sources, and I ran into troubles. First problem I had was that battery was not anymore detected (/proc/acpi/battery was empty). I googled around and I found a solution adding "ec_burst=1" to boot parameters. The se

Re: ACPI Problems

2004-12-26 Thread James Vahn
Ryan wrote: > Sure, but the logic I use is simple: If I'm not willing to blow away > the box then I'm not going to try to install something I know nothing > about. Since I need to be productive, without any downtime, (it's my > primary box) I need to ensure I can recover from whatever may happen.

Re: ACPI Problems

2004-12-26 Thread Ryan D'Baisse
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 16:09:42 -0800, James Vahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Understandable, but I don't think it's necessary to "blow away" the > box. At install time, it should be possible to switch to a shell and > simply rename your /home (or whatever) directory and remove the rest > manually

Re: ACPI Problems

2004-12-26 Thread James Vahn
Ryan D'Baisse wrote: > v3.7 and have to disable ACPI to get it to boot. I have not yet > attempted "sarge" because I am not at a point where I can blow away my > box. My goal, however, is to be running Debian (I'm somewhat sick of > the Fedora pace.) Understandable, but I don't think it's necess

Re: ACPI Problems

2004-12-26 Thread Ryan D'Baisse
detail how to solve any problems with it. Also, it was written for a kernel that was out two years ago. My ACPI problems did not surface until one of the latest versions of the kernel. =( Thanx, Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ACPI Problems

2004-12-26 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 17:26:12 -0500, Ryan D'Baisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess, at this point, I am not entirely sure where to begin. I am > looking for guidance with ACPI. > > I am currently running FC2 with kernel 2.6.5-1.358 and cannot go past > it on either FC3 or, apparently, anythin

ACPI Problems

2004-12-26 Thread Ryan D'Baisse
I guess, at this point, I am not entirely sure where to begin. I am looking for guidance with ACPI. I am currently running FC2 with kernel 2.6.5-1.358 and cannot go past it on either FC3 or, apparently, anything else. I have tried updating the kernel on FC2 to 2.6.9-1.6_FC2 and have to disable A