Re: A small doubt regarding sound drivers

2002-03-03 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"shyamk" == shyamk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: shyamk> I have found a sound driver that mentions that it has shyamk> verions for Red Hat 6.0 to 7.0 (no mention of debian) , a shyamk> version labeled 2.2.16 etc.No version for debian and shyamk> Slack. shyamk> [delete

A small doubt regarding sound drivers

2002-03-03 Thread shyamk
I have found a sound driver that mentions that it has verions for Red Hat 6.0 to 7.0 (no mention of debian) , a version labeled 2.2.16 etc.No version for debian and Slack. 1 ) My kernel version is 2.2.19 the sound card directory (as I mentioned above , I un-tarred from the directory named 2.

Re: A small doubt

2001-07-23 Thread dman
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:34:27AM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Good Morning/Evening to all, | I guess that it is standard in Unixes that : | 0 : STDIN : keyborad | 1 : STDOUT : monitor | 2 : STDERR : error output device | | If this much can be accepted , and this is true for Linux

Re: A small doubt

2001-07-23 Thread Joel Mayes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good Morning/Evening to all, > I guess that it is standard in Unixes that : > 0 : STDIN : keyborad > 1 : STDOUT : monitor > 2 : STDERR : error output device > > If this much can be accepted , and this is true for Linux verssions , too , > then how come I am

Re: A small doubt

2001-07-23 Thread brian moore
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:34:27AM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Good Morning/Evening to all, > I guess that it is standard in Unixes that : > 0 : STDIN : keyborad > 1 : STDOUT : monitor > 2 : STDERR : error output device Those file descriptors, yes. > If this much can be accepted ,

A small doubt

2001-07-23 Thread shyamk
Good Morning/Evening to all, I guess that it is standard in Unixes that : 0 : STDIN : keyborad 1 : STDOUT : monitor 2 : STDERR : error output device If this much can be accepted , and this is true for Linux verssions , too , then how come I am given an error by my Linux machine for examp

Re: A small doubt ..

2001-07-16 Thread destruss
AIL PROTECTED]) > Shyam > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "dude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 5:18 AM > Subject: Re: A small doubt .. > > > On 15 Jul 2001, at 14:03, dude wrote: &

Re: A small doubt ..

2001-07-16 Thread Brendan O'Connor
> > > I hear that this is possible with Debian and not Red Hat. Actually, this is quite possible with any distro. I think in Mandrake the partition resizing is actually built into the installer. Ah, if only we would rip off the "nice" installers or something... > I would just like to add it

Re: A small doubt ..

2001-07-15 Thread destruss
On 15 Jul 2001, at 14:03, dude wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Is there any way to install Debian potato r3 , on a Win 98 machine , > > onto an > > existing partition ? > > > > Will the installation process necessarily remove data from a disk ? > > > >

Re: A small doubt ..

2001-07-15 Thread dude
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there any way to install Debian potato r3 , on a Win 98 machine , > onto an > existing partition ? > > Will the installation process necessarily remove data from a disk ? > > fips (the partitioner) was telling me that I needed to keep at

A small doubt ..

2001-07-15 Thread shyamk
Is there any way to install Debian potato r3 , on a Win 98 machine , onto an existing partition ? Will the installation process necessarily remove data from a disk ? fips (the partitioner) was telling me that I needed to keep at leaset the last cylinder (on my primary DOS partition) free .