Re: A newbie recursion problem...:-))))

1996-12-09 Thread Pete Templin
On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > 30*20MB=600MB swap needed to be safe... I thought Linux had a limit of 128M of swap (on Intel hardware). Is this no longer true? Also, are there any known problems with using multiple swap partitions, each on a different drive? Thanks, --Pete __

Re: A newbie recursion problem...:-)))) (fwd)

1996-12-06 Thread Fabien Ninoles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Emir UNER wrote: > Yesterday i make a test like this in a virtual console > not as root(X is not running). > > I started the program and after a few seconds it began > to give the message below. > > ./test: fork: try again > > then i chan

Re: A newbie recursion problem...:-)))) (fwd)

1996-12-06 Thread Emir UNER
ECTED]> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: A newbie recursion problem...:- Resent-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 22:06:11 +0300 Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org ken (k.y.) chan wrote: > > In message "A newbie recursion problem...:-", > '[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: A newbie recursion problem...:-))))

1996-12-05 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hi, > BTW I'm running the 2.0.25 kernel. Oh...where can I define the max > number of processes > for a user??? Its defined in the Kernel Headers. The number of processes allowed for a user is half the number allowed on the system. 4 process slots are reserved for root. You can limit this with set

Re: A newbie recursion problem...:-))))

1996-12-05 Thread a2863057
ken (k.y.) chan wrote: > > In message "A newbie recursion problem...:-", > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' writes: > > >Hi to all, > > > >well I do not know whether this is a bug or not... > >Suppose a user would create a file with say ten lines, e