* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-07] :
>
> There is a difference between an SMTP-reject and a bounce message. =20
> Generally, an SMTP-reject will result in a bounce message only if a=20
> real MTA is sending.
Assuming that I have understood the distinction correctly, it appears to
vali
* Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-05] :
>
> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:23 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:37 am, Felixk Karpfen wrote:
>> > Having lost two mailboxes to the the "Swem-worm flood", I do
>> > not willingly post my true address to any public forum.
On Thursday 06 January 2005 01:20 pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I seems to me kinder on the internet not to clog up the system any
> more than I really need to, and since, as the first link says, most of
> the bounce messages don't go back to the originator
There is a difference between an SMTP-
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:23, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:37 am, Felixk Karpfen wrote:
> > Having lost two mailboxes to the the "Swem-worm flood", I do
> > not willingly post my true address to any public forum.
>
> Munging is considered harmful, get your mail admin to
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:23 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:37 am, Felixk Karpfen wrote:
> > Having lost two mailboxes to the the "Swem-worm flood", I do
> > not willingly post my true address to any public forum.
>
> Munging is considered harmful, get your mail admin t
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:37 am, Felixk Karpfen wrote:
> Having lost two mailboxes to the the "Swem-worm flood", I do
> not willingly post my true address to any public forum.
Munging is considered harmful, get your mail admin to reject viruses the
right way.
http://www.interhack.net/pubs/m
On 2005-01-01, Michael D. Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know the answer to your question, but a feature I'd like for mailing
> lists to have in general would be "send only subscriptions".
===
I believe that those are the corr
Carl Fink wrote:
Mailman has this as an option (settable by each user individually).
I also subscribe several of my e-mail addresses to the lists as
"NOMAIL" so I can send mail to the list from any mailbox without
worrying about it being rejected.
Any reason why Debian doesn't use Mailman? Seems
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 04:09:28PM -0400, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> I think anyone can post to debian-user (not sure), but many lists only
> allow subscribers to post, in an effort to keep out spam. What I'd like to
> do is subscribe in such a way that I can post but not recieve the list in
I don't know the answer to your question, but a feature I'd like for mailing
lists to have in general would be "send only subscriptions".
I think anyone can post to debian-user (not sure), but many lists only allow
subscribers to post, in an effort to keep out spam. What I'd like to do is
subs
Is there a "subscribe to list" option that will enable me to post
messages to the list and continue to read the posted listings via a
newsgroup?
Currently, I have to subscribe to "gmane.linux.debian.user" to be able
to post messages.
Felix Karpfen
--
Felix Karpfen
Public Key 72FDF9DF (DH/DSA
11 matches
Mail list logo
