Problem resolved, i recompiled the kernel and restarted, probably it was
my m8s fault . Also enabled config.gz support it's very useful.
Thanks for youre advices.
Regards, sYs^
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:07:40PM +0200, sYs wrote:
>
> uname -a:
> Linux muranyi 2.6.11.12-grsec #1 Tue Jul 26 03:04:39 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> ls -all /boot:
> *lots of file*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29391 Aug 1 13:36 config-2.6.11.12-grsec
> *lots of file*
>
> The dates are not the
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 19:29 +0200, sYs wrote:
> >>>Can you be sure that this config really relates to your running kernel?
> >
> >Someone posted this recently:
> >
> > zless /proc/config.gz
> >
> >You can examine the HIGHMEM configuration item for the kernel that's
> >running.
>
> I can't find
Jules Dubois wrote:
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 06:07, sYs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 13:06 +0200, sYs wrote:
After changing my OS (Debian Etch), it sees only 884 MB of the physical
Can you be sure th
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 06:07, sYs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Dave Ewart wrote:
>
>>On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 13:06 +0200, sYs wrote:
>>
>>>After changing my OS (Debian Etch), it sees only 884 MB of the physical
>>>
>>Can you be sure that this config really relates to yo
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 15:25 +0200, sYs wrote:
Those timestamps above suggest to me that the kernel was *compiled* on
'July 26', but that it was *installed* on 'Aug 1' - that alone doesn't
necessarily indicate a problem.
Dave.
Do you think that the *config-2.6
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 15:25 +0200, sYs wrote:
> >Those timestamps above suggest to me that the kernel was *compiled* on
> >'July 26', but that it was *installed* on 'Aug 1' - that alone doesn't
> >necessarily indicate a problem.
> >
> >Dave.
> >
> >
> Do you think that the *config-2.6.11.12-g
Dave Ewart wrote:
Those timestamps above suggest to me that the kernel was *compiled* on
'July 26', but that it was *installed* on 'Aug 1' - that alone doesn't
necessarily indicate a problem.
Dave.
Do you think that the *config-2.6.11.12-grsec* is the configuration file
for the *current run
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 14:07 +0200, sYs wrote:
> uname -a:
> Linux muranyi 2.6.11.12-grsec #1 Tue Jul 26 03:04:39 CEST 2005 i686
> GNU/Linux
>
> ls -all /boot:
> *lots of file*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29391 Aug 1 13:36 config-2.6.11.12-grsec
> *lots of file*
>
> The dates are not the s
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 13:06 +0200, sYs wrote:
Recently I have changed my kernel from 2.4.31-grsec to 2.6.11.12-grsec
and I can't resolve this problem:
After changing my OS (Debian Etch), it sees only 884 MB of the physical
memory but i have 1Gbyte (2x512MB) installed
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 13:06 +0200, sYs wrote:
> Recently I have changed my kernel from 2.4.31-grsec to 2.6.11.12-grsec
> and I can't resolve this problem:
> After changing my OS (Debian Etch), it sees only 884 MB of the physical
> memory but i have 1Gbyte (2x512MB) installed in my box and HI
Hi List!
Recently I have changed my kernel from 2.4.31-grsec to 2.6.11.12-grsec
and I can't resolve this problem:
After changing my OS (Debian Etch), it sees only 884 MB of the physical
memory but i have 1Gbyte (2x512MB) installed in my box and HIGHMEM (4gb)
support is already enabled.
free
12 matches
Mail list logo
