Re: Realtek Device ffff (rev 10) is not recognized with 8139too

2009-06-02 Thread Eric Gerlach
to ADSL and I will need to share my > net. I am at home. > > I bought a new PCI card and plug it. But it is not recognized. > > In the logs, see below, it appears that it was renamed from eth0 to eth1. > > You know if the driver 8139too is really the one for this hard

Re: Realtek Device ffff (rev 10) is not recognized with 8139too

2009-06-01 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:43:21PM +, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote: > Here are the outputs of some commands. What does dmesg show? Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Realtek Device ffff (rev 10) is not recognized with 8139too

2009-06-01 Thread Marcelo Luiz de Laia
not recognized. In the logs, see below, it appears that it was renamed from eth0 to eth1. You know if the driver 8139too is really the one for this hardware? What I could do to configure it? Here are the outputs of some commands. :~$ uname -a Linux maq 2.6.26-2-486 #1 Thu Mar 26 00:13:41 UTC 2009

Re: not an 8139C+ compatible chip, Try the "8139too" driver instead

2009-05-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 24.04.09 03:24, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > At boot with Linux 2.6.26-2-686 I see > 8139cp :00:0f.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible > chip > 8139cp :00:0f.0: Try the "8139too" driver instead. > 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.28 >

Re: not an 8139C+ compatible chip, Try the "8139too" driver instead

2009-04-28 Thread jidanni
Michael Biebl writes: > echo "blacklist 8139cp" >> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf Now with the 2.6.29-1-686 kernel none of this is needed! The errors are gone. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Re: not an 8139C+ compatible chip, Try the "8139too" driver instead

2009-04-23 Thread Michael Biebl
Michael Biebl wrote: > jida...@jidanni.org wrote: >> Now in 2.6.29-1-686 it just says >> 8139cp :00:0f.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible >> chip, use 8139too >> I assume "use" here is short for "using" and means "I

Re: not an 8139C+ compatible chip, Try the "8139too" driver instead

2009-04-23 Thread Michael Biebl
jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Now in 2.6.29-1-686 it just says > 8139cp :00:0f.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible > chip, use 8139too > I assume "use" here is short for "using" and means "I, the emitter of > this message, will use

Re: not an 8139C+ compatible chip, Try the "8139too" driver instead

2009-04-23 Thread jidanni
Now in 2.6.29-1-686 it just says 8139cp :00:0f.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip, use 8139too I assume "use" here is short for "using" and means "I, the emitter of this message, will use", and not "you, the person reading th

not an 8139C+ compatible chip, Try the "8139too" driver instead

2009-04-23 Thread jidanni
At boot with Linux 2.6.26-2-686 I see 8139cp :00:0f.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip 8139cp :00:0f.0: Try the "8139too" driver instead. 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.28 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0f.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ

Re: 2.6.18-4-686 broke 8139too

2007-05-13 Thread Adrian Levi
On 5/14/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: With 2.6.8 you have: > ACPI disabled because your bios is from 95 and too old > You can enable it with acpi=force > IRQ9: eth0 With 2.6.18, on the other hand: > ACPI: Core revision 20060707 > ACPI: setting ELCR to 0800 (from 0200) > ACP

Re: 2.6.18-4-686 broke 8139too

2007-05-13 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 16:17:55 +1000, Adrian Levi wrote: > After an upgrade from Sarge networking no linger works. I can see no > reason for it. > > I have attached lspci -vvv, dmesg, and ifconfig eth0 and > /proc/interrupts for both kernels 2.6.8-2-686 works perfectly. > > Error message is: > Ma

Re: 2.6.18-4-686 broke 8139too

2007-05-13 Thread Nigel Henry
shed some light on this problem. I havn't looked through all your attachments, but do remember on my upgrade from Woody, through Sarge, and to Etch, having to add 8139too to /etc/modules. It's going back a bit now, but may have had something to do with the change from the 2.4.27 kern

Re: 2.6.18-4-686 broke 8139too

2007-05-13 Thread Ralph Katz
hed some light on this problem. Actually, no, but this reply is being sent from an etch box with the same kernel and same 8139too chip/driver that you report (but different card). If I can help by posting any output from this box, let me know. I'm no expert at all, but notice that the kernels a

2.6.18-4-686 broke 8139too

2007-05-12 Thread Adrian Levi
s EXT3 FS on md0, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.27 PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device :00:09.0 eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xde00, 00:11:95:66:17:73, IRQ 9 eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8100B/8139D' eth0: link up, 100M

Re: 8139too eth mod problems

2004-08-11 Thread Leonardo Marques
Problem Solved! I just get a kernel clean, without any change (.tar.bz2), and recompiled from scratch using my conf file, and the module 8139too.c worked fine, without any problems. I think the problem is when i changed my old kernel to support pci, for som

Re: 8139too eth mod problems

2004-08-10 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 05:15:37AM -0300, Leonardo Marques wrote: > Hi people, > > I having problems with the new module 8139too for the Realtek > 8139 Ethernet card. > > I compiled a new kernel (2.4.27-rc4), with support to pci and > suport for t

Re: 8139too eth mod problems

2004-08-09 Thread David P James
On Mon 9 August 2004 23:19, Leonardo Marques wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:20:38PM -0400, David P James wrote: > > Try using modconf instead to install the 8139too module. Don't know > > why it works and insmod and modprobe don't, but I had a similar > > li

Re: 8139too eth mod problems

2004-08-09 Thread Leonardo Marques
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:20:38PM -0400, David P James wrote: > On Fri 6 August 2004 04:15, Leonardo Marques wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > I having problems with the new module 8139too for the Realtek > > 8139 Ethernet card. > > I know the fe

Re: 8139too eth mod problems

2004-08-09 Thread David P James
On Fri 6 August 2004 04:15, Leonardo Marques wrote: > Hi people, > > I having problems with the new module 8139too for the Realtek > 8139 Ethernet card. I know the feeling :) > I compiled a new kernel (2.4.27-rc4), with support to pci and > suport for th

8139too eth mod problems

2004-08-09 Thread Leonardo Marques
Hi people, I having problems with the new module 8139too for the Realtek 8139 Ethernet card. I compiled a new kernel (2.4.27-rc4), with support to pci and suport for this realtek card as a module. When a i give modprobe 8139too, it returns a long error

Re: 8139too [SOLVED]

2004-04-21 Thread aurel . ric
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm trying to install a DLink DFE-530 TX (Rev-C1) PCI NIC Card on a Woody > (tried > > with 2.4.18 kernel), which seems to work with 8139too module (according to > some > > post

Re: 8139too

2004-04-20 Thread Colin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to install a DLink DFE-530 TX (Rev-C1) PCI NIC Card on a Woody (tried with 2.4.18 kernel), which seems to work with 8139too module (according to some posts). I'm wondering if this f module needs other module(s) (or built-in option) becau

Re: 8139too

2004-04-20 Thread Cristi Banciu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to install a DLink DFE-530 TX (Rev-C1) PCI NIC Card on a Woody (tried with 2.4.18 kernel), which seems to work with 8139too module (according try via-rhine module. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: 8139too

2004-04-20 Thread Chris Metzler
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:49:24 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I'm trying to install a DLink DFE-530 TX (Rev-C1) PCI NIC Card on a > Woody (tried with 2.4.18 kernel), which seems to work with 8139too > module (according to some posts). > I'm wo

Re: 8139too

2004-04-20 Thread Chris Metzler
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:49:24 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm trying to install a DLink DFE-530 TX (Rev-C1) PCI NIC Card on a > Woody (tried with 2.4.18 kernel), which seems to work with 8139too > module (according to some posts). > I'm wondering if this f mo

8139too

2004-04-20 Thread aurel . ric
Hi all, I'm trying to install a DLink DFE-530 TX (Rev-C1) PCI NIC Card on a Woody (tried with 2.4.18 kernel), which seems to work with 8139too module (according to some posts). I'm wondering if this f module needs other module(s) (or built-in option) because I can't get

Re: 8139too Module

2004-01-28 Thread Alan Ianson
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:24:27AM -, Timothy Paling wrote: > On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:36, Timothy Paling wrote: > Producing this listing shows that 8139too is not in the list. > > modprobe simple reports that it cannot find the module. > > How do I proceed further? I

RE: 8139too Module

2004-01-28 Thread David Clymer
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:28, Timothy Paling wrote: > The module does not appear in modconf either, however, it does appear in > menuconf (make menuconf) and there is a .c source file for the module in > with the kernel source. > > How to compile this module therefore is my new question. > well,

RE: 8139too Module

2004-01-28 Thread Sebastiaan
Hi, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Timothy Paling wrote: > > to install a kernel module, you must switch to root, then type: modprobe > > > > > > for example: modprobe 8139too > > > > you may need to insert the mii module as well. > > > The module does n

RE: 8139too Module

2004-01-28 Thread Timothy Paling
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:36, Timothy Paling wrote: > Producing this listing shows that 8139too is not in the list. > > modprobe simple reports that it cannot find the module. > > How do I proceed further? I've located the source for the module in the > Kernel source how

Re: 8139too Module

2004-01-27 Thread Nick Hastings
* Timothy Paling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040128 11:29]: > > On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:36, Timothy Paling wrote: > Producing this listing shows that 8139too is not in the list. > > modprobe simple reports that it cannot find the module. > > How do I proceed further? Rer

Re: 8139too Module

2004-01-27 Thread Nick Hastings
rdBus card working. The Cardbus itself is working (I have verified this by > looking at /var/log/syslog when inserting the card). > > I am aware that I need to install the 8139too module, however, I'm > completely unsure on how to do this. Two ways kernel modules can be installed (

Re: 8139too Module

2004-01-27 Thread John Schmidt
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 07:24 pm, Timothy Paling wrote: > On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:36, Timothy Paling wrote: > Producing this listing shows that 8139too is not in the list. > > modprobe simple reports that it cannot find the module. > > How do I proceed further? I've loc

RE: 8139too Module

2004-01-27 Thread Timothy Paling
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:36, Timothy Paling wrote: Producing this listing shows that 8139too is not in the list. modprobe simple reports that it cannot find the module. How do I proceed further? I've located the source for the module in the Kernel source however, I'm unsure as to

Re: 8139too Module

2004-01-27 Thread David Clymer
self is working (I have verified this by > looking at /var/log/syslog when inserting the card). > > I am aware that I need to install the 8139too module, however, I'm > completely unsure on how to do this. > If you are using the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel, I think that support for tha

8139too Module

2004-01-27 Thread Timothy Paling
inserting the card). I am aware that I need to install the 8139too module, however, I'm completely unsure on how to do this. Anyhelp or advice would be much appreciated. Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: strange 8139too problem/question

2003-09-20 Thread Bob Proulx
Paul William wrote: > I went through the woody installation. I installed the 2.4.18-bf kernel > and when I got to the part of the install where you select kernel > modules the 8139too (realtek 8139 NIC driver) was not there?!?! The 8139too driver is compiled into the bf24 kernel series

8139too parameters

2003-09-19 Thread Eric Etheridge
I have a D-Link DFE-530 TX+ ethernet card. On the D-Link page they offer a linux driver for it, which is the RTL-8139 driver. http://support.dlink.com/Products/view.asp?productid=DFE-530TX+ The autoprobe fails. What parameters can I try to make it work? Please CC to me, as my inbox can't take the

Re: strange 8139too problem/question

2003-09-18 Thread Albert Dengg
> Hi, > > I went through the woody installation. I installed the 2.4.18-bf kernel > and when I got to the part of the install where you select kernel > modules the 8139too (realtek 8139 NIC driver) was not there?!?! > > I then exited the installation and reinstalled because I n

strange 8139too problem/question

2003-09-18 Thread Paul William
Hi, I went through the woody installation. I installed the 2.4.18-bf kernel and when I got to the part of the install where you select kernel modules the 8139too (realtek 8139 NIC driver) was not there?!?! I then exited the installation and reinstalled because I need that driver. I did my

Re: 8139too driver options

2003-06-13 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:03:02PM -0700, Jeremy Brooks wrote: > I need to set the eth0 interface to 100MB/Full Duplex. I have added > append="ether=0,0,0x30,eth0" to lilo.conf and re-run lilo. On reboot, > it comes up 10MB/Half Duplex. That particu

Re: 8139too driver options

2003-06-12 Thread Chris Metzler
On 12 Jun 2003 12:03:02 -0700 Jeremy Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi, > I need to set the eth0 interface to 100MB/Full Duplex. I have added > append="ether=0,0,0x30,eth0" to lilo.conf and re-run lilo. On reboot, > it comes up 10MB/Half Duplex. > > Is anyone familiar with this driver? A

8139too driver options

2003-06-12 Thread Jeremy Brooks
hi, I need to set the eth0 interface to 100MB/Full Duplex. I have added append="ether=0,0,0x30,eth0" to lilo.conf and re-run lilo. On reboot, it comes up 10MB/Half Duplex. Is anyone familiar with this driver? Are my options incorrect? Many thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: 8139too not loading

2003-03-10 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Joan Tur wrote: > Thanks. Now usb modules and printer module are loaded automatically, but... > the 8139too module now complains about unresolved symbols 8-? Hmmm, that's odd. Are you sure that you didn't accidentally install another c

8139too not loading

2003-03-09 Thread Joan Tur
a 2.4 kernel -- I believe the usb > support in 2.4 is more complete. (kernel-image-2.4.18-586 for a > pentium-optimized kernel) Thanks. Now usb modules and printer module are loaded automatically, but... the 8139too module now complains about unresolved symbols 8-? The kernel image loaded

8139too modprobe freezes the machine

2003-02-05 Thread Xavier Barnabe-Theriault
hi On muy debian/stable P1 home server w/2 realtek NIC, everything works smoothly with 2.2.20 and rtl8139. But with 2.4.18 and 8139too, the modprobe dies saying this: Loading modules: af_packet 8139too 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.24 PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:0b.0 to 64

Re: 8139too on 2.2.19 ?

2002-02-05 Thread ben
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 12:48 pm, Jason Majors wrote: [snip] > > My friend kelly is having the same problem. We're going to try the 8139too > for him, because people on the list are suggesting it. > But I have the same card and never had to use the too on 2.2. check last mo

Re: 8139too on 2.2.19 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Ray
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 06:09:48PM -0500, Jason M. Harvey wrote: > did you happen to ever use two nics in the same pc that used the same > module?!? i'm wondering if that would work... as long as modules.conf > has eth0 and eth1 both specified... on the other hand, walking her > through all this ov

Re: 8139too on 2.2.19 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Jason M. Harvey
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:14:43PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: | > > | > My friend kelly is having the same problem. We're going to try the 8139too | > for him, because people on the list are suggesting it. | > But I have the same card and never had to use the too on 2.2. | T

Re: 8139too on 2.2.19 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Stephen Gran
s very happy). it defaulted to kernel > > 2.2.19 (no pre1). her nic was autodetected, and the 8139too module was > > inserted. now, that's weird- i've never seen (or tried) 8139too on 2.2.x > > kernels. so, i had her set up her interfaces file, and networking > > r

Re: 8139too on 2.2.19 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Majors
she tried > everything... different irq's, irq settings in bios and PnP. i told her > how great they worked for me! > so, i mailed her my woody cd #1 that i downloaded back in november. she > now has that installed (and is very happy). it defaulted to kernel > 2.2.19 (no pre1).

8139too on 2.2.19 ?

2002-02-05 Thread Jason M. Harvey
everything... different irq's, irq settings in bios and PnP. i told her how great they worked for me! so, i mailed her my woody cd #1 that i downloaded back in november. she now has that installed (and is very happy). it defaulted to kernel 2.2.19 (no pre1). her nic was autodetected, and the 813

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139too (was Problems with 8139too...)

2001-04-22 Thread Marc Haber
e there is a >reason why 8139too was written (it's newer right?) The rtl8139 driver has always been experimental. 8139too is the new driver which is only marked as experimental in the sources and not in the kernel konfig. 2.4 has 8139too only. See it as

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139too (was Problems with 8139too...)

2001-04-18 Thread David Wright
Quoting Emil Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > While more or less on the subject 8139, could someone please explain the > differenses between these, and what benefits one might have over the > other. I've used them both without trouble, but I asume there is a > reason why 8139too

rtl8139 vs. 8139too (was Problems with 8139too...)

2001-04-18 Thread Emil Pedersen
zwar erkannt, aber nicht korrekt initialisiert wird (kein link > >beat). > > Sorry, didn't mean to post that to the list. I need to wear a paper > bag for some time. > > What I wrote is: 2.2.19 has both rtl8139 and 8139too, and sourceforge > has a even later 8139too for 2.4.3 w

Re: Problems with 8139too driver in kernel 2.4.2

2001-04-17 Thread Marc Haber
kein link >beat). Sorry, didn't mean to post that to the list. I need to wear a paper bag for some time. What I wrote is: 2.2.19 has both rtl8139 and 8139too, and sourceforge has a even later 8139too for 2.4.3 which fixes an initializing problem occuring on an older 8139-based card with the 81

Re: Problems with 8139too driver in kernel 2.4.2

2001-04-15 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:49:27 +0200, Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:37:23PM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote: >> I have two cheap cards and it worked fine and straightforward for > >On my newer machines it worked well too. > >> me. The only problem I had was

Re: Problems with 8139too driver in kernel 2.4.2

2001-04-01 Thread Michael Meskes
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:37:23PM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote: > I have two cheap cards and it worked fine and straightforward for On my newer machines it worked well too. > me. The only problem I had was that I selected a wrong driver the first > time, then I browsed the drivers disket

Re: Problems with 8139too driver in kernel 2.4.2

2001-03-30 Thread Daniel Toffetti
I have two cheap cards and it worked fine and straightforward for me. The only problem I had was that I selected a wrong driver the first time, then I browsed the drivers diskette and found the right driver, which is already bundled with the kernel. Have you compared the sources of

Problems with 8139too driver in kernel 2.4.2

2001-03-30 Thread Michael Meskes
I've been using this driver ever since I got myself soem cheap 100MB cards and it worked flawlessly so far. But today I tried upgrading an old machine from 2.2.18 to 2.4.2 and it freezes upon initialization of that driver, no matter if it is compiled as module or not. I tried changing the card to