On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:21 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-01-06 18:13 +0100, Freeman wrote:
>
> > But is somebody still building 32-bit cpu's?
>
> Yes, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture, for instance.
> It will be fun when all those embedded devices break.
>
> Sven
>
An
John Hasler put forth on 1/6/2010 12:48 PM:
> Freeman writes:
>> But is somebody still building 32-bit cpu's?
>
> Of course, and 16-bit and 8-bit as well. Embedded systems vastly
> outnumber pcs and are rarely 64-bit.
And there are a lot of embedded 32 bit Linux systems in the wild, and many mor
Freeman writes:
> But is somebody still building 32-bit cpu's?
Of course, and 16-bit and 8-bit as well. Embedded systems vastly
outnumber pcs and are rarely 64-bit.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On 2010-01-06 18:13 +0100, Freeman wrote:
> But is somebody still building 32-bit cpu's?
Yes, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture, for instance.
It will be fun when all those embedded devices break.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:03:39AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-01-06 07:45 +0100, Freeman wrote:
>
> > Can anyone speculate on when 32-Bit Land will stop evolving and we will all
> > have to part the waters and migrate to 64-Bit Land?
>
> I guess that there is
On 2010-01-06 07:45 +0100, Freeman wrote:
> Can anyone speculate on when 32-Bit Land will stop evolving and we will all
> have to part the waters and migrate to 64-Bit Land?
I guess that there is little to worry for the next ten years. However,
you should better complete the transition
uld I use
> > for the conversion under Debian Lenny?
>
> Indeo, eh? Convert it quick while you still can. Over
> in 64-bit land, I can't even watch Indeo (No one has
> a 64-bit Linux Indeo codec).
>
Can anyone speculate on when 32-Bit Land will stop evolving and we wil
7 matches
Mail list logo
