Reco wrote:
> Please don't do so. Ssh only provides SOCKS4 proxy, and SOCKS4 can not tunnel
> DNS requests (or any UDP traffic for that matter).
How old is your information on that? Even in Squeeze the man-page for
ssh says:
,
| Currently the SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 protocols are supported, and s
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
>
> > > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:
On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
> > > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:01:25 +0300
Reco wrote:
> >
> > When network.proxy.socks_remote_dns is set to true, the DNS
> > requests are sent through the SOCKS connection and delivered to
> > your computer at home (which ultimately is sent to your ISP but you
> > already thrust it with that informat
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> >
>
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > > Mike McClain wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Ri
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >> Scarletdown wrote:
> > >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and ser
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> Scarletdown wrote:
> >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
> >>
> >> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how thos
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
> >How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
>
> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
> implications when using personal hotspot.
>
> >The
> >way I understand how those work, y
usage.
bald_bohemian
On 06/17/2015 12:58 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the U
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the U
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how those work, you will have your Internet
service with you no matter where you are, as lon
Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connect
2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
>> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>>
>> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
>> physical location.
>>
>> I was a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> physical location.
>
> I was assuming that m
Hi Richard.
I faced a similar situation although a bit differently a few months ago.
The only WISP in the area announced they were shutting down the present
service which ran at 512 kbps and would offer upgrades to a new service
that runs 10 Mbps. Fine, but what they did not say officially was th
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service? The way I
understand how those work, you will have your Internet service with you
no matter where you are, as long as you can get a signal from your provider.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
> location.
>
You're in the US?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> physical location.
>
> I was assuming t
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical locat
Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell netw
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
> On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> > Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
> >
> > I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict m
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that corr
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to
one physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
What questions should I be asking?
Ple
Hello
daniel huhardeaux (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> this is information for thus who want to use such kind of modem on
> there computer. I have an ASUS L3500D running unstable and installed
> the last Pctel drivers. Computer freeze with or without kernel panic.
> But installing the deb package
Hello everybody,
this is information for thus who want to use such kind of modem on there
computer. I have an ASUS L3500D running unstable and installed the last
Pctel drivers. Computer freeze with or without kernel panic. But
installing the deb package of sl-modem-daemon did the trick. It seem
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:37AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:42:51 +,
> Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:16:24AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:52:57 +,
> > > Pigeon <[EMA
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:42:51 +,
Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:16:24AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:52:57 +,
> > Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > with), as lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 06:11:31PM +0800, csj wrote:
> Because I need my mobo's lone serial port for my UPS, I got a
> usb-serial converter (modules usbserial and pl2303) to connect my
> serial modem to (dev/ttyUSB0). I get respectable 46K speeds and
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:16:24AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:52:57 +,
> Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > with), as long as you're in the right country; at least in the UK, the
> > frequency is legally required to average out to ex
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:17:50 +0800,
Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 01:16:24 +0100
> Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > s/US/UK/ In practical terms, if the smoothing can cope with 50Hz,
> > > it will cope with 60Hz; it'll b
On 2. January 2004 at 6:46PM -0600,
"Jacob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> perhaps I need to stop looking for USB externals (that
> are still non-winmodems) and get a plain serial external.
Because I need my mobo's lone serial port for my UPS, I got a
usb-serial converter (modules usbseri
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 01:16:24 +0100
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > s/US/UK/ In practical terms, if the smoothing can cope with 50Hz, it
> > will cope with 60Hz; it'll be in the adapter not the modem anyway;
> > and it's generally designed on the basis of "1000uF is big enough"
> > :-)
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:52:57 +,
Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:04:49PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:23:58 +0100,
> > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:04:49PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:23:58 +0100,
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:31:12PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 07:08:38PM -0800, Paul Johnson w
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:23:58 +0100,
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:31:12PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 07:08:38PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> >
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:31:12PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 07:08:38PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:13:12PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> > > That's an interesting thought. Any recommendations f
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 20:37:17 -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> > Is it just me or is it hard to find a good external hardware modem
> > (non-win/linmodem) these days?
>
> I'm using a US Robotics 56K Performance Pro, model number 5
it will also function as a DHCP server and NAT
firewall - out of the box, as well as connecting to your ISP
automatically whenever one of the computers tries to access the
internet.
All interfacing with the modem appears to be done through
either of it's 2 10/100Mbps ethernet connections(Yea, wa
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:30:59 +0100
"Dr.-Ing. C. Hurschler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so I should just keep my mouth shut and not suggest there might be
> alternatives? Like I said, I got that specific modem to work as a
> newbie, thats all. Did I suggest that it was a better choice? No.
No,
d tech support before, and having been on the list
> for a while, it's often best to just give the easiest answer first.
> Yes, you can get many internal modems to work. But we probably don't
> know what is involved in getting your ACME SuprSurfr SpeedWhiz 56k
> Whatever goi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 04:32:42PM +0100, Dr.-Ing. C. Hurschler wrote:
> I know you guys are talking about external modems, and I'd aggree that they're
> probably easier to get running than an internal modem, but I bought a Smart
I know you guys are talking about external modems, and I'd aggree that they're
probably easier to get running than an internal modem, but I bought a Smart
Link 56K Modem (Internal) over ebay for a couple of euros and got it running
under Woody as a relative newbie. I had to compile
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 07:08:38PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:13:12PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> > That's an interesting thought. Any recommendations for a good online
> > store selling external modems in the UK?
>
> I
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:12:42 -0800
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:46:28PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> > Wal-Mart's a good suggestion, I'll have to check there next. I've
> > not been as successful finding them o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:46:28PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Wal-Mart's a good suggestion, I'll have to check there next. I've not
> been as successful finding them online as I had hoped... perhaps I need
> to stop looking for USB externals (that are st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:13:12PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> That's an interesting thought. Any recommendations for a good online
> store selling external modems in the UK?
I wouldn't bother. The US dollar is super-weak right now, so a 25
pound modem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 08:37:17PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Is it just me or is it hard to find a good external hardware modem
> (non-win/linmodem) these days?
Not really, no. Just go to Fry's Electronics. You can shop at Fry's
on outpost.com if you
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 17:52:03 -0600
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 08:37:17PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> > Is it just me or is it hard to find a good external hardware modem
> > (non-win/linmodem) these days?
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> I believe from your address that y
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 08:37:17PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Is it just me or is it hard to find a good external hardware modem
> (non-win/linmodem) these days?
>
> Any suggestions?
I believe from your address that you're in the U.S. I'm speaking from
that assumption.
I've seen them in Wal-Marts
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:05:19 +
Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 08:37:17PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> In the UK at least, external serial modems have become *easier* to
> find in the last year or so. Cheaper too. Most computer fairs have
> several stalls selling exter
a non-pcmcia, preferably external but PCI
> will work as well, 56k call waiting modem.
>
> Any suggestions? (Yes, I've read the supported devices lists on various
> websites and browsed through various websites selling hardware, but I'm
> curious to hear what others are using.
Jacob S. wrote:
Is it just me or is it hard to find a good external hardware modem
(non-win/linmodem) these days?
I'm looking for one for a friend that's using Linux and not ready to pay
for broadband yet. He needs a non-pcmcia, preferably external but PCI
will work as well, 56k call wai
mcia, preferably external but PCI
> will work as well, 56k call waiting modem.
>
> Any suggestions? (Yes, I've read the supported devices lists on various
> websites and browsed through various websites selling hardware, but I'm
> curious to hear what others are using.)
>
eferably external but PCI
> will work as well, 56k call waiting modem.
>
> Any suggestions? (Yes, I've read the supported devices lists on various
> websites and browsed through various websites selling hardware, but I'm
> curious to hear what others are using.)
>
>
Is it just me or is it hard to find a good external hardware modem
(non-win/linmodem) these days?
I'm looking for one for a friend that's using Linux and not ready to pay
for broadband yet. He needs a non-pcmcia, preferably external but PCI
will work as well, 56k call waiting m
David Selby wrote:
I have a relative who has moved out to Australia & am interested in
using a webcam & 56K modem for a video link (I know the picture
quality will be rough)
Can anyone point me in the right direction for video link software ?
Many thanks
Dave
Thanks for the help, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 14 November 2003 3:17 pm, David Selby wrote:
> I have a relative who has moved out to Australia & am interested in
> using a webcam & 56K modem for a video link (I know the picture
> quality will be rough)
>
>
>
I have a relative who has moved out to Australia & am interested in
using a webcam & 56K modem for a video link (I know the picture quality
will be rough)
Can anyone point me in the right direction for video link software ?
Many thanks
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:13:40PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>
> >I've recently bought a US Robotics 56K PCI winmodem. I realized the last
> >part (winmodem) just a few days ago.
> >
> >How do I install it in Woody?
> >
> >Currently I'
I've recently bought a US Robotics 56K PCI winmodem. I realized the last
part (winmodem) just a few days ago.
How do I install it in Woody?
Currently I'm using Woody, unstable/testing and kernel 2.4.20.
YES These modems are "supported." They problem is that the entire
cator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:22 PM
To: Debian
Subject: US Robotics 56K PCI winmodem + Woody
I've recently bought a US Robotics 56K PCI winmodem. I realized the last
part (winmodem) just a few days ago.
How do I install it in Woody?
Currently I'm usi
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:22:05PM +0100, Aedificator wrote:
> I've recently bought a US Robotics 56K PCI winmodem. I realized the last
> part (winmodem) just a few days ago.
>
> How do I install it in Woody?
You don't; if this has changed (with respect to USR winmod
I've recently bought a US Robotics 56K PCI winmodem. I realized the last
part (winmodem) just a few days ago.
How do I install it in Woody?
Currently I'm using Woody, unstable/testing and kernel 2.4.20.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:04:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> making a backup of my old one. I tried the new kernel, and now when I run
> PPPD, I get an error saying it can't open /dev/modem OR /dev/ttyS14 (my
> modem). When I run minicom, it says I'm online already as soon as it
> initia
Deven,
> making a backup of my old one. I tried the new kernel, and now when I run
> PPPD, I get an error saying it can't open /dev/modem OR /dev/ttyS14 (my
> modem).
Does it work when you are root? If so, you may need to add yourself
to some groups like dialout and dip. Look to see what grou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was using my Lucent just fine earlier today, after installing a
Linux599.zip driver. It worked great, except when I ran PPPD, it said there
was no kernel PPP support. I looekd at make xconfig, and found that was
indeed true. I enabled PPP support, recompiled, and ins
I was using my Lucent just fine earlier today, after installing a
Linux599.zip driver. It worked great, except when I ran PPPD, it said there
was no kernel PPP support. I looekd at make xconfig, and found that was
indeed true. I enabled PPP support, recompiled, and installed the kernel,
making
Deven,
> Hi, I'm having a problem installing the driver for my Lucent 56k WinModem. My
> lspci -vv readout says I have a "Lucent Microelectronics WinModem 56k". I'm
> trying to install the "Lucent LT Modem driver", which seems to be correct.
> The ins
>
> > I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo
5300cs is supported
> > under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on
how to set it up.
> > Can anyone tell me, or point me to a good HOWTO? Thanks.
> >
If you have a winmodem
Hi, I'm having a problem installing the driver for my Lucent 56k WinModem. My
lspci -vv readout says I have a "Lucent Microelectronics WinModem 56k". I'm
trying to install the "Lucent LT Modem driver", which seems to be correct.
The installation goes through witho
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Try www.google.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on [31/07/01 at 00:35]:
> I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo 5300cs is supported
> under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on how to set it up.
> Can anyo
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:41:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo 5300cs is supported
> under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on how to set it up.
> Can anyone tell me, or point me to a good HOWTO?
I know the Lucent 56k modem built into my Gateway Solo 5300cs is supported
under Linux, but I can't seem to find any information on how to set it up.
Can anyone tell me, or point me to a good HOWTO? Thanks.
-- Deven
Er... I forgot. you want to uncomment this also:
DATAINIT="$DATAOPT -j+FAA=1"# Class 2[.0] modem adaptive answer
DCMD="exec /sbin/getty -h $DEV %d vt100"# for getty_ps (Linux)
J.
--
Jeronimo Pellegrini
Institute of Computing - Unicamp - Brazil
http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~je
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 06:20:57PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> I'm very frustrated trying to get efax to properly receive faxes through my
> USR 56K modem (a v.90 type, now). All faxes come in appearing like something
> streaked out sideways. I'm allowing efax to determin
I'm very frustrated trying to get efax to properly receive faxes through my
USR 56K modem (a v.90 type, now). All faxes come in appearing like something
streaked out sideways. I'm allowing efax to determine the best fit with the
modem (instead of specifying the type myself).
Has any
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 02:59:18PM +0200, Chris Gielen wrote:
>
> So you are saying it is not posible to achieve higher rates then 33.6k with
> 2 x 56k connected to an analog phone line?
That's what he's saying and he's correct too.
--
Ray
> 1) I recently purchased a USR v90 56k Internal Voice modem, I tryed to detect
>my modem under debian it couldn't find it. but apon checking windows it
> listed as COM 5, how do I get debian to detect com5
>
are you sure, it is no winmodem? if it is ok, then you possib
Good Morning;
I've just recently installed debian on my computer. I'm having trouble
with 2 things.
1) I recently purchased a USR v90 56k Internal Voice modem, I tryed to detect
my modem under debian it couldn't find it. but apon checking windows it
listed as COM 5, how do
>Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Thirunathan Sutharsan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>How can I get my US Robotics 56k faxmodem to work with Debian 2.1? Please
>provide me with the steps I need to follow. Thanks.
Tell us what you have tried and what problems you are having. Give
complete details.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Thirunathan Sutharsan wrote:
> How can I get my US Robotics 56k faxmodem to work with Debian 2.1? Please
> provide me with the steps I need to follow. Thanks.
Is your modem internal? If so is it a PCI card? Only a very few PCI
modems can be made to run under Linux.
How can I get my US Robotics 56k faxmodem to work with Debian 2.1? Please
provide me with the steps I need to follow. Thanks.
On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
> here at Brazil is very difficult to find a 56K internal modem
> that is not Winmodem.
> I want to buy an internal 56k modem (external are expensives)
> but cant find a model. Anyone with a re
At 08:28 AM 8/7/99 , you wrote:
I have basically the same modem (Acer/AOpen FM56 ITU or something like that).
Works awesome in Linux, never any problems.
I really suggest it as well. Here in Canada, I've seen it for less than $70.
Ditto. I picked up my Acer/AOpen modem for under $70.00 inclu
At 02:10 PM 8/7/99 , you wrote:
I have an internal 56k PCI Fax/Data modem made by USR that is not a
WinModem. This was purchased about 10 months ago. Looking at VA
Research's custom workstation page, an internal 3com (aka USR) 56k PCI
fax-modem is available as an option. So, you should be
On 07-Aug-99 Salman Ahmed wrote:
> At 03:13 AM 8/7/99 , you wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> here at Brazil is very difficult to find a 56K internal modem that
>>is not Winmodem.
>> I want to buy an internal 56k modem (external are expensives) but
>>cant find a
have an internal 56k PCI Fax/Data modem made by USR that is not a
WinModem. This was purchased about 10 months ago. Looking at VA
Research's custom workstation page, an internal 3com (aka USR) 56k PCI
fax-modem is available as an option. So, you should be able to find one
if that's wha
At 03:13 AM 8/7/99 , you wrote:
Hi all,
here at Brazil is very difficult to find a 56K internal modem that
is not Winmodem.
I want to buy an internal 56k modem (external are expensives) but
cant find a model.
Anyone with a real 56k internal modem can give me your specification
of
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 04:13:05AM -0300, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
> Hi all,
> here at Brazil is very difficult to find a 56K internal modem that
> is not Winmodem.
> I want to buy an internal 56k modem (external are expensives) but
> cant find a mode
Hi all,
here at Brazil is very difficult to find a 56K internal modem that
is not Winmodem.
I want to buy an internal 56k modem (external are expensives) but
cant find a model.
Anyone with a real 56k internal modem can give me your specification
of model & etc?
Is there 5
Evan Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Are you logged in as root? pon/poff do require that, i seem to remember.
>
> --Evan
>
With the correct file permissions, pon/poff *can* be run by a normal,
non-root, user.
--
Ed C.
gt; I am a new Linux User. I need Help!
> I am having Problems Setting up My Supra 56k PNP PCI modem with Debian. I
> can install the Base System from Floppy Fine. When I Tryed to connect to my
> ISP it told me that /usr/bin/pon: /usr/sbin/pppd: Permission denied. So I
> read the install manua
Are you logged in as root? pon/poff do require that, i seem to remember.
--Evan
I am a new Linux User. I need Help!
I am having Problems Setting up My Supra 56k PNP PCI modem with Debian. I
can install the Base System from Floppy Fine. When I Tryed to connect to my
ISP it told me that /usr/bin/pon: /usr/sbin/pppd: Permission denied. So I
read the install manual and it told me
You're missing the point. PCI already supports IO/IRQ/DMA/MEM configuration and
discovery. In fact, I think if the device "talks" like a UART the only thing
you'll
need to do is use setserial to tell it what IO and IRQ are used. Why don't you
run
scanpci and see what it prints out. It'll tell you
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Phil wrote:
> The PCI modems are fairly new, be on the look out for sound cards
> too(ISA will eventually disappear from new motherboards thus the PCI
> versions). I decided to go with this to free up a ISA slot... I only
> have two, and one is ISA/PCI slot(shares the same ca
Isn't a Baud_base of 115200 too small for a 56k speed ? Shouldn't it be
23something (231400 ?) for that speed ? don't they say that the modem-computer
rate should be at least 4 times then line speed ?
> The changes made no difference. Thanks for the suggestions, though.
>
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
