ver ip be the same all the time ?!!?
>
> think about it too. :)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:48 PM
> Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
>
> > On Thu,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:16:47PM +0200, Game Wizard wrote:
| umm, perhaps i am wrong as i don't know what kind of switch do u have but
| isn't switch's purphose is to divide the network into subnets ??!
A router would do that. A switch is a link-layer device. It is the
same as a hub, but inste
L PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> ...
>
> I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
> in my case) wasn&
On Thursday 14 February 2002 14:48, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> ...
>
> I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
> in my case) wasn't the Right Way.
>
> | The 486 that connects to the internet also does the masque
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:48:41PM -0500, dman scribbled...
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> ...
>
> I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
> in my case) wasn't the Right Way.
>
> | The 486 that connects to the internet also d
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
...
I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
in my case) wasn't the Right Way.
| The 486 that connects to the internet also does the masquearading. All
| traffic flow to eth0, and gets masq'd, but t
Yes this clears it up, I'm not using ppp (or pptp) so I forgot all about it
being considered an interface.
apt-get upgrade brain :)
John
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:31, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> On 2002.02.14 17:35:55 +0100 John Cichy wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 February 2002 11:27, Matijs
Thursday, February 14, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
>
> I have potato on a 486SX, 25MHz, 300MB hard drive, 8MB RAM. It tends
> to drag because it swaps a lot, but otherwise is fully functional. I
> had it masquerading the dial-up connection with n
On 2002.02.14 17:35:55 +0100 John Cichy wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2002 11:27, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> > The
> > reason I don't have it masquerading the DSL connection is I don't
want
> > to buy a second ISA NIC.
>
> If your DSL is anything like mine, you don't have to. I have all my
>
your internal net is not exposed to the
> internet and all is ok :-
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Cichy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 6:35 PM
> Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
>
>
On Thursday 14 February 2002 11:27, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> > I have potato on a 486SX, 25MHz, 300MB hard drive, 8MB RAM. It tends
> > to drag because it swaps a lot, but otherwise is fully functional. I
> > had it masquerading the dial-up connection with no problems. The
> > reason I don't
I have potato on a 486SX, 25MHz, 300MB hard drive, 8MB RAM. It tends
to drag because it swaps a lot, but otherwise is fully functional. I
had it masquerading the dial-up connection with no problems. The
reason I don't have it masquerading the DSL connection is I don't want
to buy a second ISA
12 matches
Mail list logo
