Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 18. Februar 2002 00:26 schrieb Tom Cook:
> >
> > Heck, why not buy a few cheapy nics and build a beowulf cluster? *grin*
> >
> > One of our departments here are rumored to have a large number (ie.
> > hundreds) of 486s running such a cluster, and it is
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2002 00:26 schrieb Tom Cook:
>
> Heck, why not buy a few cheapy nics and build a beowulf cluster? *grin*
>
> One of our departments here are rumored to have a large number (ie.
> hundreds) of 486s running such a cluster, and it is very nice, so I am
> told...
>
> Tom
Yeah,
Rob Ransbottom wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:16:18PM +, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> | I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
> | (33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
> | before they go to the rubbish.
> | I wanted install the minimum
:
> hda1: boot, 4 Mb
> hda2: swap, 4 Mb
> hda3: 81 Mb
>
> Confirme is what I have done is relatively suitable.
> I can put hda1=40 Mb and hda2=8 Mb for my disk is too small.
>
> --
> Gerard
>
> PS.
> 4 Mb of RAM is not enough I had to put 8 Mb to make it work
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:54:56PM +, Gerard Robin wrote:
> I downloaded the 6 diskets 1.44 driver1 2
> and all worked fine until I get Next: install base system.
> I put driver1-bin in the floppy but I got this anser:
>
> wrong disk you need disk1 of series the base series.
> Where
other question:
I had created 3 partition :
hda1: boot, 4 Mb
hda2: swap, 4 Mb
hda3: 81 Mb
Confirme is what I have done is relatively suitable.
I can put hda1=40 Mb and hda2=8 Mb for my disk is too small.
--
Gerard
PS.
4 Mb of RAM is not enough I had to put 8 Mb to make it work.
Perhaps it's
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:16:18PM +, Gerard Robin wrote:
| I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
| (33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
| before they go to the rubbish.
| I wanted install the minimum of linux for the mail
| (exim, mutt, fetchmail, procmail, etc
ver ip be the same all the time ?!!?
>
> think about it too. :)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:48 PM
> Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
>
> > On Thu,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:16:47PM +0200, Game Wizard wrote:
| umm, perhaps i am wrong as i don't know what kind of switch do u have but
| isn't switch's purphose is to divide the network into subnets ??!
A router would do that. A switch is a link-layer device. It is the
same as a hub, but inste
L PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> ...
>
> I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
> in my case) wasn&
On Thursday 14 February 2002 14:48, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> ...
>
> I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
> in my case) wasn't the Right Way.
>
> | The 486 that connects to the internet also does the masque
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:48:41PM -0500, dman scribbled...
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> ...
>
> I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
> in my case) wasn't the Right Way.
>
> | The 486 that connects to the internet also d
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
...
I too thought that putting the DSL modem on the hub (actually a switch
in my case) wasn't the Right Way.
| The 486 that connects to the internet also does the masquearading. All
| traffic flow to eth0, and gets masq'd, but t
Yes this clears it up, I'm not using ppp (or pptp) so I forgot all about it
being considered an interface.
apt-get upgrade brain :)
John
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:31, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> On 2002.02.14 17:35:55 +0100 John Cichy wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 February 2002 11:27, Matijs
Thursday, February 14, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
>
> I have potato on a 486SX, 25MHz, 300MB hard drive, 8MB RAM. It tends
> to drag because it swaps a lot, but otherwise is fully functional. I
> had it masquerading the dial-up connection with n
On 2002.02.14 17:35:55 +0100 John Cichy wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2002 11:27, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> > The
> > reason I don't have it masquerading the DSL connection is I don't
want
> > to buy a second ISA NIC.
>
> If your DSL is anything like mine, you don't have to. I have all my
>
your internal net is not exposed to the
> internet and all is ok :-
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Cichy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 6:35 PM
> Subject: Re: 486 SX (masquerading DSL connection)
>
>
On Thursday 14 February 2002 11:27, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> > I have potato on a 486SX, 25MHz, 300MB hard drive, 8MB RAM. It tends
> > to drag because it swaps a lot, but otherwise is fully functional. I
> > had it masquerading the dial-up connection with no problems. The
> > reason I don't
I have potato on a 486SX, 25MHz, 300MB hard drive, 8MB RAM. It tends
to drag because it swaps a lot, but otherwise is fully functional. I
had it masquerading the dial-up connection with no problems. The
reason I don't have it masquerading the DSL connection is I don't want
to buy a second ISA
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:16:18PM +, Gerard Robin wrote:
| hello,
| I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
| (33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
| before they go to the rubbish.
| I wanted install the minimum of linux for the mail
| (exim, mutt, fetchmail, procmail
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:49:04PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> > > I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
> > > (33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
> > > before they go to the rubbish.
> > I must disagree here, worked
* Seneca Cunningham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
...
> Do think it is possible for me to get it onto my 386 with 1M RAM? I can
> do my own compiling on a pentium, but I would need to get it onto 1.2M
> floppies (I can't get into my 386's BIOS, so it can't boot off of its
> 1.4M drive (only th
Seneca Cunningham wrote:
> Do think it is possible for me to get it onto my 386 with 1M RAM?
I think you might be struggling with only 1Mb of ram to get any Linux
distribution running.
Even Small Linux (http://www.superant.com/smalllinux/) requires a 386
with 2Mb ram.
Em Qua, 2002-02-13 às 21:49, Seneca Cunningham escreveu:
> Michel Loos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Em Qua, 2002-02-13 às 15:40, Mark Janssen escreveu:
> > > On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:16, Gerard Robin wrote:
> > >
> > > hello,
> > > I hav
Michel Loos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Qua, 2002-02-13 às 15:40, Mark Janssen escreveu:
> > On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:16, Gerard Robin wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> > I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
> > (33Mz, 25Mz, hard
Em Qua, 2002-02-13 às 15:40, Mark Janssen escreveu:
> On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:16, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> hello,
> I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
> (33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
> before they go to the rubbish.
>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:16:18PM +, Gerard Robin wrote:
> but my CD-ROM drive is ignored by the bios of these machines
> and so I must install linux with diskets 1.44, but I have two
> questions: is it possible to do it ?
Installing debian from floppy disks is no problem at all.
> And if i
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:16, Gerard Robin wrote:
hello,
I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
(33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
before they go to the rubbish.
It will be a really painful and slow task... but it'll work... provided they have some
d
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: 486 SX
hello,
I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
(33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
before they go to the rubbish.
I wanted install the minimum of linux for the mail
(exim, mutt
hello,
I have the oppotunity to get hold of few omputers 486 SX
(33Mz, 25Mz, hard disk = 89 Mb or 127 Mb)
before they go to the rubbish.
I wanted install the minimum of linux for the mail
(exim, mutt, fetchmail, procmail, etc..)
but my CD-ROM drive is ignored by the bios of these machines
and
Have you ever experienced runnning an IRC client over XWindows in an
old Intel 486SX33?
Alguem jah executou um clint de IRC num 486 dentro do X Windows?
Eu vou ter que usar uns 486 fuleragens com IRC. (Um bom e facil de
usar)/X Windows/Linux/Intel 486 33.
TIA
31 matches
Mail list logo
