Re: 4 doubts on Kernel compilation (A dual boot Win-Lin Machine)

2001-10-09 Thread Erik Steffl
Steve Kowalik wrote: > > At 10:05 am, Tuesday, October 9 2001, Stephen Gran mumbled: > > p.s. - I'm told the debian way is much easier, but I've never used it, > > so others can tell you more. > > > AHHA! The Debian Way! > Basically, you can install a kernel-source .deb from apt, or download a >

Re: 4 doubts on Kernel compilation (A dual boot Win-Lin Machine)

2001-10-09 Thread Steve Kowalik
At 10:05 am, Tuesday, October 9 2001, Stephen Gran mumbled: > p.s. - I'm told the debian way is much easier, but I've never used it, > so others can tell you more. > AHHA! The Debian Way! Basically, you can install a kernel-source .deb from apt, or download a tarball from kernel.org, it doesn't r

Re: 4 doubts on Kernel compilation (A dual boot Win-Lin Machine)

2001-10-08 Thread Stephen Gran
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I was told that the following were the steps for making a kernel : > cd /usr/src/linux > make config > make dep > make clean > make bzImage > make modules > > I have 4 doubts : > 1. If I have made a kernel module , say prn.o , does this automatically get > entry >

4 doubts on Kernel compilation (A dual boot Win-Lin Machine)

2001-10-08 Thread shyamk
I was told that the following were the steps for making a kernel : cd /usr/src/linux make config make dep make clean make bzImage make modules I have 4 doubts : 1. If I have made a kernel module , say prn.o , does this automatically get entry into a kernel through this procedure ? 2. Could some