PCI
> "Hurricane" (3c555/3cSOHO) PCI
The 509 is different, but that doesn't seem to be relevant here:
> Subject: 3Com 3C905B-TX (3c59x.o) Kernel problem?!
3c59x.o is the correct driver. And I've had no problems using it to
drive an Etherl
Hi Alexandru,
your subject line seems to be a little confused about type card you have.
a 3c905 is not a 3c590 , nor a 3c509,
and therefore they do not have same driver.
but probably you selected same module as you did on potato ?
hm, your message sounds like
you didnt install network
Any hint or tip will be appreciated! Thank You in advance!;-)
I'm running debian woody on a AMD Athlon and compiled a few kernels
from kernel.org trying to fix my NIC problem.
The problem is: the 3Com NIC works absolutely fine with my 2.2 kernel but for any
2.4 version and even the unstable 2.5
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:56:36PM -0600, Tilton wrote:
> "S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
> >
> > I got this OEM 3Com 3c905B card and added it to my system (ABIT-BH6,
> > Celeron 300A) which already has a generic 10/100 PCI NIC that has thus
> > far been working per
"S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
>
> I got this OEM 3Com 3c905B card and added it to my system (ABIT-BH6,
> Celeron 300A) which already has a generic 10/100 PCI NIC that has thus
> far been working perfectly with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service.
>
> BTW, the other NIC that works f
Alson van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Before that I tried two different NICs to no avail, which leads me to
> > believe NICs may be inherently flaky. So maybe try another one (I
> > convinced my local h/w vendor to lend me this one, slightly used, and
> > I ended up buying it)
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 09:35:58AM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> FWIW I've got a working PIII/3c905b/terayon setup.
> My only initial problem with it was dyslexia: 509 is not the same as
> 905! IOW, you need to use the right driver, which in my case means
>
> alias eth0 3c59x
>
> in /etc/modu
FWIW I've got a working PIII/3c905b/terayon setup.
My only initial problem with it was dyslexia: 509 is not the same as
905! IOW, you need to use the right driver, which in my case means
alias eth0 3c59x
in /etc/modutils/aliases.
Before that I tried two different NICs to no avail, which lea
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 10:08:22AM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
>
> I got this OEM 3Com 3c905B card and added it to my system (ABIT-BH6,
> Celeron 300A) which already has a generic 10/100 PCI NIC that has thus
> far been working perfectly with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service.
>
>
Michael Hammonds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: what driver do I use to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
Download the latest version of 3c59xx - works better than the 3c90x ones,
for me.
Cheers,
Derk
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:21:49 MDT, Art Lemasters writes:
> Those darned model numbers are confusing, aren't they? ;-)
>I'm running the same driver for my 3c905tx, though. The config
>for the 2.2.12 kernel said it was good for both the 3c59x series
>and the 3c90x series ethernet cards, IIRC.
t
do I use to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 06:25:54PM -0500, David Punsalan wrote:
> The installation program that comes with the debian base disks shows that
> 3c59X is for the 3c509 ...so I guess it's okay to use the driver for
> 3c59x.
Those darned model numbers are confusing, aren't they? ;-)
I'm running t
The installation program that comes with the debian base disks shows that
3c59X is for the 3c509 ...so I guess it's okay to use the driver for
3c59x.
> 3c59x, 3c9xx, something like that (I think it says both). It's
> in the custom kernel compile config. Someone here will correct
> me if I'm wron
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 04:10:00PM -0400, Michael Hammonds wrote:
> what driver do I use to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
3c59x, 3c9xx, something like that (I think it says both). It's
in the custom kernel compile config. Someone here will correct
me if I'm wrong. ;-)
Art
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Michael Hammonds wrote:
> what driver do I use to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
>
You would use the 3c59x driver, also identified as the "Vortex" driver.
Trying to kill the keyboard, Michael Hammonds produced:
> what driver do I use to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
The 905B is supported by the 3c59x driver.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
>
JDM
Jason D. Mich
what driver do I use to install a 3com 3c905B Network card
> I apologize for asking the question when it's been addressed so often, but
> the answers I've found in the mail archives haven't been simplistic enough
> for me.
>
> I have a hamm box freshly installed from CD. It has a 3COM 3c905B-TX NIC in
> it that doesn
I apologize for asking the question when it's been addressed so often, but
the answers I've found in the mail archives haven't been simplistic enough
for me.
I have a hamm box freshly installed from CD. It has a 3COM 3c905B-TX NIC in
it that doesn't seem to be recognized. I
On 9 Dec, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
>
> I have been offered twisted-pair (RJ)
> only PCI boards, 3Com 3C905B-TX, which I map tp
> 10Base-Tx, Cyclone B revision, aka `Boomerang',
the B version is supposedly 'cyclone' rather than 'boomerang'.
> Anything I sho
Because of all the trouble I had with my ISA SMC's, I am
considering the, ahem, "cheap" way out and get me new
Ethernet boards. I have been offered twisted-pair (RJ)
only PCI boards, 3Com 3C905B-TX, which I map tp
10Base-Tx, Cyclone B revision, aka `Boomerang', aka
EtherLink
Akop,
Many thanks.
On 28 Aug 98, at 21:36, Akop Pogosian wrote:
> The 3c900/905 cards are supported with the latest 3c59x driver.
> Even if redhat 5.0 does recognize your card it will not function.
> At least, this was my case. This is because, the RedHat CD that I
> had came with 2.0.32 kerne
he Debian CD and I want to be sure
> everything is going to be ready).
>
> Currently I have as many different network cards as PC's. Two are recognised
> by RH 5.0 two are not.
>
> The ones that are NOT recognised by RH5.0 are a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100/B
> and a 3Com 3
Thanks Nathan.
Dave
On 28 Aug 98, at 10:36, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Debian 2.0 works with the 905b just fine. Install the 3C59x module.
Dave Warnock
Sundayta Ltd
www.sundayta.co.uk
On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, David Warnock wrote:
[ snip ]
: EtherExpress Pro 100/B and a 3Com 3c905b-tx Fast Etherlink XL
: PCI 10/100base-tx.
Debian 2.0 works with the 905b just fine. Install the 3C59x module.
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL
ready).
Currently I have as many different network cards as PC's. Two are recognised by RH 5.0 two are not.
The ones that are NOT recognised by RH5.0 are a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100/B and a 3Com 3c905b-tx Fast Etherlink XL PCI 10/100base-tx.
Are these going to be recognised / work with H
28 matches
Mail list logo