http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/3c59x.c
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >performance fo the 3c905 (100MBit cards) leaves a lot to be desired. The
> >0.41 driver available from Donald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>performance fo the 3c905 (100MBit cards) leaves a lot to be desired. The
>0.41 driver available from Donald Becker's site is reasonably stable
>with a few provisos (has problems with 16 collision retries and cable
Rob enscribed thusly:
> I may be wrong, but why compile support for 3c59x when your card is
> 3c905?? get the numbers mixed up there? :)
You are wrong.
The 3c59x (vortex) and 3c90x (boomerang) cards are all supported by
the same driver (assuming that the driver is recent enough).
Hi,
I was playing with this stuff a while back and it looks to me like the
3c900/3c905 series is an update/replacement for the 3c590/595 series. On
Donald Becker's home page at cesdis:
http://cesdis1.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/
there are a couple of different driver versions for the 3c900/905 series
on
I may be wrong, but why compile support for 3c59x when your card is
3c905?? get the numbers mixed up there? :)
-Rob
On Sun, 6 Jul 1997, Marty Leisner wrote:
>
> I just bought a Pentium pro with a bundled 3c905 boomerang card...
>
> I figured to t
> I just bought a Pentium pro with a bundled 3c905 boomerang card...
>
> I figured to try it out in windows to see if it works...couldn't
> get the enet card to work...
>
> Installed redhat 4.2...the boomerang worked with no problem...
>
> (but I built a clean 2.0.30 with 3c59x support and I had
I just bought a Pentium pro with a bundled 3c905 boomerang card...
I figured to try it out in windows to see if it works...couldn't
get the enet card to work...
Installed redhat 4.2...the boomerang worked with no problem...
(but I built a clean 2.0.30 with 3c59x support and I had no luck...)
> >I installed using May 30 diskette set (Debian 1.3.0, Kernel 2.0.29).
From
> >there, I chose the 3c59x module (I got this information from the above
URL
> >- like Dave mentioned, this should definitely be identified in modconf).
> >
> >I tried setting various options for this driver (as per the
On Fri, 4 Jul 1997 11:36:29 -0700, Kevin Traas wrote:
>I installed using May 30 diskette set (Debian 1.3.0, Kernel 2.0.29). From
>there, I chose the 3c59x module (I got this information from the above URL
>- like Dave mentioned, this should definitely be identified in modconf).
>
>I tried setting
> >Well, I just bought one after my transceiver died on an old 3c509, and
to my disapointment, it didn't work under 2.0.30 (device or resource busy
it said).
> >I went to the hardware howto, and found a link to Donald Becker's
homepage.
> >There's an upgraded version of 3c59x.c which works ok with
> > are the 90x cards even supported yet?
>
> Well, I just bought one after my transceiver died on an old 3c509, and to
my disapointment, it didn't work under 2.0.30 (device or resource busy it
said).
> I went to the hardware howto, and found a link to Donald Becker's
homepage.
> There's an upgrad
On Fri, 04 Jul 1997 01:00:34 -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
>On Thu, 03 Jul 1997 16:49:14 CDT m* ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Dave Cinege wrote:
>> >
>> > I call upon you Kernel gods. You see, it will not end by itself. Please put
>> > the words "and 3c90x" on the vortex driver line in the con
On Thu, 03 Jul 1997 16:49:14 CDT m* ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Dave Cinege wrote:
> >
> > I call upon you Kernel gods. You see, it will not end by itself. Please put
> > the words "and 3c90x" on the vortex driver line in the configs. (Or someone
> > submit a patch. I don't know how)
>
> are t
>
> >Dave Cinege wrote:
>
> Thus, and I swear I see it at least once a day, people keep asking if
> the XL series is supported at all.
this was the first i had heard of it, but great!
thanks,
m*
--
"The Shining One"
--
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
On Thu, 03 Jul 1997 16:49:14 -0500, m* wrote:
>Dave Cinege wrote:
>>
>>
>> I call upon you Kernel gods. You see, it will not end by itself. Please put
>> the words "and 3c90x" on the vortex driver line in the configs. (Or someone
>> submit a patch. I don't know how)
>>
>
>are the 90x cards even
Dave Cinege wrote:
>
>
> I call upon you Kernel gods. You see, it will not end by itself. Please put
> the words "and 3c90x" on the vortex driver line in the configs. (Or someone
> submit a patch. I don't know how)
>
are the 90x cards even supported yet?
then again i have not ventured beyond v
On Thu, 3 Jul 1997 10:42:01 -0700, Kevin Traas wrote:
>
>I'm just in the process of trying to put a Linux box onto the Fast Ethernet
>network here at work. My only choice for a NIC is a 3COM 3C905-TX.
>
>Has anyone successfully configured this card under Debian Linux?
>
Oops!!! Never mind! I did a little RTFM'ing and found what I needed!
Thanks anyway,
Kevin Traas
--
> From: Kevin Traas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: 3COM 3C905-TX PCI NIC
> Date: July 3, 1997 10:42 AM
>
>
> I'm j
I'm just in the process of trying to put a Linux box onto the Fast Ethernet
network here at work. My only choice for a NIC is a 3COM 3C905-TX.
Has anyone successfully configured this card under Debian Linux?
(Note, this is a 905, not a 509.)
Thanks,
Kevin Traas
Systems Analyst
Baan Bus
19 matches
Mail list logo
