Hello,
> > >
> > > I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> > > 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> > > lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
> > &g
Ron Johnson said:
> On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:50, nate wrote:
>> Stephen Gran said:
>>
>> > It's a kernel module. Definitely in the later 2.2 series, don't
>> rememebr if it's also in 2.4
>>
>> I think it's only included with donald becker's drivers(not with the
>> official kernel). I think he uses
27;t recognized my NIC
> > 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> > lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
> > idea about my problem?
> >
> > Thank's
> > Ariane
--
+-
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:50, nate wrote:
> Stephen Gran said:
>
> > It's a kernel module. Definitely in the later 2.2 series, don't rememebr
> > if it's also in 2.4
>
> I think it's only included with donald becker's drivers(not with the official
> kernel). I think he uses it to improve code port
Stephen Gran said:
> It's a kernel module. Definitely in the later 2.2 series, don't rememebr
> if it's also in 2.4
I think it's only included with donald becker's drivers(not with the official
kernel). I think he uses it to improve code portability between 2.0, 2.2 and
2.4 kernels.
donald's dri
This one time, at band camp, Ron Johnson said:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:51, user list wrote:
> > We have recently had similar behavior. However, we found that even
> > though the we received installation failed messages, it actually worked.
> > During the device driver configuration step, are you
an 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> > 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> > lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
> > idea about my problem?
--
+
Edwards
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:57:30PM -0200, Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> lot of compilation errors. Has some
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:57:30PM -0200, Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> lot of compilation errors. Has some
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 09:57, Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do tha
Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
Hello,
I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
idea about my problem?
Th
Hello,
I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
idea about my problem?
Thank's
Ariane
--
Ariane Machado Lima
u stupid faster."
Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell
-Original Message-
From: Colin Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:28 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Compile 3c90x module prolem
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:57:28PM -0700, deFree
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:57:28PM -0700, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> I am trying to compile the module for my 3c905B card. When I compile
> the object and try to run "insmod 3c90x" I get an error saying that
> the module was compiled for version 2.2.20 and the kernel is 2.2.19.
Hello,
I am trying to compile the module for my 3c905B card. When I compile the
object and try to run "insmod 3c90x" I get an error saying that the module
was compiled for version 2.2.20 and the kernel is 2.2.19. I am using the
-I/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.19/include directive so I
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:25:55PM +0200, Franck Benhamou wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I have a problem to install 3c90x driver on Debian 2.2.17 .
|
| I have installed the 3com packages : 3c90x-1.0.0i.tar.gz
Do the prepackaged ones not work for you?
| Any ideas
Try 'modprobe 3c59x'.
-D
Hi all,
I have a problem to install 3c90x driver on Debian 2.2.17 .
I have installed the 3com packages : 3c90x-1.0.0i.tar.gz
When I try to compile with ./compile_UP the return is :
In file included from 3c90x.c:1:
3c90x.h:23: linux/modversions.h: No such file or directory
In file included
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone's gotten the 3c90x drivers from 3com to work. I
just downloaded them but when I try to compile I get a bunch of syntax
errors.
This is a new system do I might not have gcc configured properly.
Also, would it be easier to just go with a newer version o
I have both a 3C905B-FX (fiber NIC) and a 3c59x-series card in my
machine.
I grabbed 3Com's driver from
http://support.3com.com/infodeli/tools/nic/linuxdownload.htm
and just patched my kernel source tree:
patch -d /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.18 -p0 < 3c90x-1.0.0/patch-2.2.5
I
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:48:13AM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote:
> > I lied. Well, I didn't look closely enough. It's a 3c905cx-txm.
> > Anyway, I tried the 3c59x module first, actually, but it didn't work.
> > Now I'm not even sure the 3com provided driver will work. I
I tried a different network card - 3c905-tx - with the 3c50x driver
module. This doesn't work either. It does, however, spit out some kind
of error message. Trouble is, I can't read it, because it appears on
the blue screen behind the install dialog. Is there any way to read
this? I can see
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:48:13AM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote:
> I lied. Well, I didn't look closely enough. It's a 3c905cx-txm.
> Anyway, I tried the 3c59x module first, actually, but it didn't work.
> Now I'm not even sure the 3com provided driver will work. I might just
> put in a different
day, February 21, 2001 4:48 PM
> To: John Kuhn
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: 3com 3c90x install
>
> I lied. Well, I didn't look closely enough. It's a 3c905cx-txm.
> Anyway, I tried the 3c59x module first, actually, but it didn't work.
>
: Re: 3com 3c90x install
I lied. Well, I didn't look closely enough. It's a 3c905cx-txm.
Anyway, I tried the 3c59x module first, actually, but it didn't work.
Now I'm not even sure the 3com provided driver will work. I might just
put in a different card...
Still wouldn'
I lied. Well, I didn't look closely enough. It's a 3c905cx-txm.
Anyway, I tried the 3c59x module first, actually, but it didn't work.
Now I'm not even sure the 3com provided driver will work. I might just
put in a different card...
Still wouldn't mind knowing how the third-party module instal
You don't need to compile this driver from source. During the 'Configure
Device Driver Modules' load the '3c59x' module. Yes, the current 3c59x
module does work with the 3c905c-tx. I used the 3com source driver
with older versions of the 2.2.x kernels, but it is not needed for
2.2.18pre21.
John
I'm trying to do a network install of debian on a computer which has a
3com 3c905c-tx network card. 3com kindly provides GNU licenced source
code for this card on their website. I succesfully compiled the module
on another debian system, and put it on a floppy, in directory
/lib/modules/2.2.18pre
"F.P. Groeneveld" wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : # /etc/init.d/network
> : SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device
> : SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
>
> I _think_ this is just the new networking code in the newer kernel. Old
> syntax ifconfig/routing commands generate thes
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Galbra >So I decided to try the 3c90x driver from 3Com, but it doesn't
> Galbra >work for me. I compiled a module and get this when I load it:
>
> i always have statically co
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Galbra >So I decided to try the 3c90x driver from 3Com, but it doesn't
Galbra >work for me. I compiled a module and get this when I load it:
i always have statically compiled the driver into my kernel i dont know if
that makes a difference
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: # /etc/init.d/network
: SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device
: SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
I _think_ this is just the new networking code in the newer kernel. Old
syntax ifconfig/routing commands generate these, I seem to recall. Anypne?
Cheers,
D
The 3c59x module works for me, but I keep getting errors like
this logged:
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82
So I decided to try the 3c90x driver from 3Com, but it doesn't
work for me. I compiled a module and get this when I load it:
# insmod 3c90x
Using /lib/modules/2.2.1
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
>
> Anything to worry about?
We were seeing this on a RedHat 6.2 machine with an Intel EEPro100 here
at work the other day. Changed out the cable and it stopped doing it.
(And meas
gt; :> 100mbit/s full duplex connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x
> :> module does, so I believe it to be better :)
>
> : How does one find out?
>
> The easy way is to look at the lights on your network hub/switch.
Which made me think... There's a light indicator on th
l computer.
:> The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do
:> 100mbit/s full duplex connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x
:> module does, so I believe it to be better :)
: How does one find out?
: I used to use a Tulip-based card that said so on driver
:
andard kernel did not do
> 100mbit/s full duplex connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x
> module does, so I believe it to be better :)
How does one find out?
I used to use a Tulip-based card that said so on driver
initilisation, but all I get now is:
3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker
htt
On 1, aug, 2000 at 07:39:07 -0600, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > [1 ]
> > Gary Hennigan wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Also, you should seriously consider looking at the kernel-package
> > > package, in particular look at the make-kpkg utility. It makes using
> > > custom-compile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [1 ]
> Gary Hennigan wrote:
[snip]
> > Also, you should seriously consider looking at the kernel-package
> > package, in particular look at the make-kpkg utility. It makes using
> > custom-compiled kernels in Debian MUCH easier to deal with.
> >
> > To use it you just
Gary Hennigan wrote:
> "Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Raphael Crawford-Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ok so I patched the kernel successfully and went through make config and
> > > make dep just fine.
> > >
> > > when I do make bzImage (also tried zImage, zdisk, and bzd
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Raphael Crawford-Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ok so I patched the kernel successfully and went through make config and
> > make dep just fine.
> >
> > when I do make bzImage (also tried zImage, zdisk, and bzdisk) everything
> > works fine un
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:16:58 PDT, "Raphael Crawford-Marks" writes:
>as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsect.s
>make[1]: as86: Command not found
you´ll need the bin86-package
>I've never heard of as86...couldn't find any packages by that name either.
finding packages by filename is easiest via
http:/
"Raphael Crawford-Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok so I patched the kernel successfully and went through make config and
> make dep just fine.
>
> when I do make bzImage (also tried zImage, zdisk, and bzdisk) everything
> works fine until it gets to the very end:
>
> as86 -0 -a -o bootsect
debian.org
Subject: RE: 3c90x woes
Importance: Low
I'm running a box with a 3Com 3C905C-TXM, at the moment with
potato-testcycle-3
and kernel version 2.2.15.
The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do 100mbit/s
full duplex
connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x module does, so
3c905Cs require updated drivers if your REALLY LUCKY you can get the
default kernel driver to work although it most likely will say ***
INVALID CHECKSUM ***
best to get the drivers from www.3com.com (my reccomendation)
the detection logged by the kernel is as follows:
3Com 3c90x Version 1.0.0d
> Hmm. Well that didn't work for me. I wish it did...I don't care if I only
> get 10 Mb/s. But everytime I tried the 3c59x Vortex driver the system would
> crash and I'd have to do a hard reboot. Did you use any special options to
> make it work?
Nope, and I didn't compile as a module. Here is
(usually /usr/src/linux) and run
patch -p0 I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried
to
raphae >get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. Downloaded 3com's
3c90x
raphae >driver from their site, but couldn't figure out what to do with it
Christoph Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:15 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 3c90x woes
> I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
> get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. [...]
I'm using the
> I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
> get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. [...]
I'm using the Vortex driver from the standard kernel compilation menu,
and it seems to be working nicely; on the other hand, the rest of the
net is 10Mb/s, so I c
I'm running a box with a 3Com 3C905C-TXM, at the moment with
potato-testcycle-3
and kernel version 2.2.15.
The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do 100mbit/s
full duplex
connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x module does, so I believe it to be
better :)
Of the ways desc
Raphael Crawford-Marks wrote:
> I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
> get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. Downloaded 3com's 3c90x
> driver from their site, but couldn't figure out what to do with it (their
> readme
I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. Downloaded 3com's 3c90x
driver from their site, but couldn't figure out what to do with it (their
readme said to run install3c90x, a file that was not
You need the 3c59x driver, it includes 3C90x.
/* EtherLinkXL.c: A 3Com EtherLink PCI III/XL ethernet driver for linux. */
/*
Written 1996-1998 by Donald Becker.
This software may be used and distributed according to the terms
of the GNU Public License, incorporated
Hi there
I'd be grateful if someone could tell me where to obtain these drivers from.
Many thanks
Pieter
The Linux kernel already has support for this card, use the 3c590/3c900
series driver.
Nate
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Veselin Tabakov wrote:
> Hi,
> I have new 3C90X network adapter but I haven't drivers for this card.
> I'm try to write module for this card but this is a very s
The 3C59X driver supports _both_ the 3COM Vortex cards and the Boomerang
cards which is your 3c90x. It also happens to be the one I have. :)
You can get the latest driver from:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/
Have fun.
-Ossama
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have new 3C90X network adapter but I haven't drivers for this card.
>
Use the 3c59x ("Vortex") driver - it works fine.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have new 3C90X network adapter but I haven't drivers for this card.
I'm try to write module for this card but this is a very stupid
idea.
If anybody have idea where to get drivers for this card just write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIA
Vesselin Tabakov
Network Administrator
Overgas I
57 matches
Mail list logo
