On Sb, 04 oct 14, 22:49:32, John Hasler wrote:
>
> The "Getting Debian" page refers specifically to "64 bit PC" and "32 bit
> PC" but I suppose clarification of exactly what "AMD64" means could be
> added. File a bug. With a patch.
These wordings were specifically chosen because many people wou
Chris Bannister writes:
> A MAC is still a PC. PC is short for Personal Computer.
Yes. Unfortunately, in common parlance a "peecee" is a desktop computer
running Microsoft Windows. As in "Do you have a peecee?" "No. I have
a Mac."
The "Getting Debian" page refers specifically to "64 bit PC" a
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:22:21PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 10/04/2014 11:25 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> > Harry Putnam writes:
> >> So the unwary reader is led to believe that amd means an architecture
> >> different from `pc'.
> >
> > "pc" doesn't mean an architecture.
> >
> This is probably not mu
On 10/04/2014 11:25 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> Harry Putnam writes:
>> So the unwary reader is led to believe that amd means an architecture
>> different from `pc'.
>
> "pc" doesn't mean an architecture.
>
This is probably not much help to the person who provoked the question.
"PC" normally means
On 10/04/2014 11:12 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Andrei POPESCU writes:
My machine has nothing to do with amd
Well, AMD created the x86-64 architecture we are all using (Intel's
IA-64 never became really popular), so actually it does ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amd64
That is interesting. I
On 2014-10-04, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> So the unwary reader is led to believe that amd means an architecture
> different from `pc'.
PC stands for Personal Computer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Harry Putnam writes:
> So the unwary reader is led to believe that amd means an architecture
> different from `pc'.
"pc" doesn't mean an architecture.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Andrei POPESCU writes:
>> My machine has nothing to do with amd
>
> Well, AMD created the x86-64 architecture we are all using (Intel's
> IA-64 never became really popular), so actually it does ;)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amd64
That is interesting. I would not have guessed at that fact
On Sat 04 Oct 2014 at 09:47:46 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I want to download a jessie weekly build for 64 bit PC.
>
> What is the appropriate architecture on the downloads?
>
> My machine has nothing to do with amd but that is the only thing
> listed as 64 bit on the pages including jessie or
On Sb, 04 oct 14, 09:47:46, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I want to download a jessie weekly build for 64 bit PC.
>
> What is the appropriate architecture on the downloads?
>
> My machine has nothing to do with amd
Well, AMD created the x86-64 architecture we are all using (Intel's
IA-64 never became
On Saturday 04 October 2014 14:47:46 Harry Putnam wrote:
> is
> amd64 what I should download for a 64 bit PC?
Yes.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.
I want to download a jessie weekly build for 64 bit PC.
What is the appropriate architecture on the downloads?
My machine has nothing to do with amd but that is the only thing
listed as 64 bit on the pages including jessie or testing.
However, at https://www.debian.org/distrib/ the starting pag
On 2014-03-29 18:35 +0100, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Thanks! Finally got the new machine set up to try the crossgrading, and
> everything worked just fine. There's just one issue remaining: a huge
> number of i386 packages on the machine show dependencies on either apt
> or dpkg, so any attempt to
Darac Marjal writes:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:37PM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> I'm about to replace one of my old 32-bit x86 Debian boxes with a
>> 64-bit; I'll actually just be moving the disk drives out of the old box
>> into the new one and doing any minor configuration changes that'l
On 03/04/2014 05:12 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:37PM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
I'm about to replace one of my old 32-bit x86 Debian boxes with a
64-bit; I'll actually just be moving the disk drives out of the old box
into the new one and doing any minor configuration c
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:37PM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I'm about to replace one of my old 32-bit x86 Debian boxes with a
> 64-bit; I'll actually just be moving the disk drives out of the old box
> into the new one and doing any minor configuration changes that'll be
> neede (which will be
I'm about to replace one of my old 32-bit x86 Debian boxes with a
64-bit; I'll actually just be moving the disk drives out of the old box
into the new one and doing any minor configuration changes that'll be
neede (which will be very minor). So, while I'm at it, I'm curious --
is there any clean w
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> François Patte a écrit :
> >apt-get install AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i386linux_fra
> >...
> >E: Unable to locate package AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i386linux_fra
> ...
>
> So, you have to download the archive from the official website, and
> then run "#dpkg -i AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i386
Le 31.10.2013 12:44, François Patte a écrit :
Le 30/10/2013 23:37, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit :
Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
wrote:
Bonjour,
Is there a way to build a debian package
Le 30/10/2013 23:37, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
>
>
> Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit :
>> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
>>> On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
>>> wrote:
Bonjour,
Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:28:04PM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
> built for a 32bits platform.
If the package does not have complex preinst/postinst scripts (or their
RPM equivalents), the following method may
Le 30/10/2013 23:21, Beco a écrit :
> On 30 October 2013 19:10, François Patte
> wrote:
>> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
>>
>> AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package
>> cannot be built on this system
>>
>>
>
> Hi François,
>
> What is the exact command you
Le 30.10.2013 23:34, Beco a écrit :
On 30 October 2013 19:28, wrote:
I think the kind of information he want is, for example, the
software's
name. Or the software's role.
Exactly! If it is ADOBE READER (I'm guessing), in this site
http://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions/
You get to cho
Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit :
Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
wrote:
Bonjour,
Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm
package
built for a 32bits platform.
I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package
On 30 October 2013 19:28, wrote:
> I think the kind of information he want is, for example, the software's
> name. Or the software's role.
Exactly! If it is ADOBE READER (I'm guessing), in this site
http://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions/
You get to choose operational system, language and
Le 30/10/2013 23:23, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
>
>
> Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit :
>> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
>>> On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
>>> wrote:
Bonjour,
Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm
Le 30.10.2013 23:07, François Patte a écrit :
Le 30/10/2013 20:27, Bob Proulx a écrit :
François Patte wrote:
Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm
package
built for a 32bits platform.
I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
installed.
Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit :
Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
wrote:
Bonjour,
Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm
package
built for a 32bits platform.
I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package
On 30 October 2013 19:10, François Patte
wrote:
> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
>
> AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package
> cannot be built on this system
>
>
Hi François,
What is the exact command you issued?
On a first check, I think maybe there is a pr
François Patte wrote:
> Bob Proulx a écrit :
> > François Patte wrote:
> >> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
> >> built for a 32bits platform.
> >>
> >> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
> >> installed.
> >
> > You still haven
Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit :
> On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
> wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
>> built for a 32bits platform.
>>
>> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
>> installed.
>
Le 30/10/2013 20:27, Bob Proulx a écrit :
> François Patte wrote:
>> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
>> built for a 32bits platform.
>>
>> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
>> installed.
>
> You still haven't answered my ques
On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte
wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
> built for a 32bits platform.
>
> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
> installed.
>
> Thank you.
Hi Fraçois,
You just want to r
Le 30/10/2013 22:46, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit :
> François Patte writes:
>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
>> built for a 32bits platform.
>
> There's no way to *build* amd64 package from any another non-source
> package. But you could *rep
François Patte writes:
> Bonjour,
>
> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
> built for a 32bits platform.
There's no way to *build* amd64 package from any another non-source
package. But you could *repack* .rpm package into .deb one using alien.
But if it was n
François Patte wrote:
> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
> built for a 32bits platform.
>
> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
> installed.
You still haven't answered my question concerning this in the other
thread. What is t
Bonjour,
Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package
built for a 32bits platform.
I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be
installed.
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Universit
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 8/11/2013 4:08 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> I recently went through the exercise of putting a GbE NIC into an old 32
> bit x86 machine w/PCI only. The first card I purchased, a $10 USD
> TP-Link w/RTL8169, couldn't power on. It is a 3.3v only
Gregory Seidman wrote:
> It looks like it will be worth my while to copy partitions over to the new
> disk, if only so I can increase the size of my root partition (which I
> foolishly made too small).
Did you use LVM? If so then you can simply expand it with some free
space from elsewhere. Assu
Thanks to everyone for the helpful input. It looks like there is no
advantage to converting to 64-bit, which is just fine with me. The new
machine has 4GB of RAM, so I am not hitting address space issues. I don't
do anything more CPU-intensive than spam filtering. I do occasionally do
some I/O-inte
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Moral of the story? The OP may need to spend ~$30 USD for an Intel
> PCI NIC to guarantee it'll work on the first go. He probably gave not
> much more than this for entire used machines. Factor in that you can
> get a brand new mobo/cpu/RAM combo with GbE and GPU today for
On 08/11/13 19:44, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I ate the $10 NIC putting it on a shelf because return shipping +
restocking fee is almost $10. Second time around I emailed the e1000
driver list. An Intel engineer responded and verified that the
universal model of the Pro/1000 GT should work. Ordered
On 8/11/2013 4:08 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Christensen wrote:
>> Gregory Seidman wrote:
>>> I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
>>> showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
>>> was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a
David Christensen wrote:
> Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
> > showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
> > was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a while because it was
> > hanging).
>
> Ins
On 11/08/13 10:28 AM, Doug wrote:
On 08/11/2013 09:12 AM, David Baron wrote:
Results like not worth the effort, though it can be done now as a
crossgrade much more easily. I had tried the dbootstrap method. Almost
got there but ... had to restore.
The main question is whether 32 bit packages
On 08/11/2013 09:12 AM, David Baron wrote:
> Results like not worth the effort, though it can be done now as a
> crossgrade much more easily. I had tried the dbootstrap method. Almost
> got there but ... had to restore.
>
>
>
> The main question is whether 32 bit packages will be gradually phas
Results like not worth the effort, though it can be done now
as a crossgrade much more easily. I had tried the
dbootstrap method. Almost got there but ... had to
restore.
The main question is whether 32 bit packages will be
gradually phased out. One can already find missing
pieces. If this be
On Sunday 11 August 2013 12:59 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/10/2013 7:25 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a
On 8/10/2013 7:25 PM, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
> showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
> was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a while because it was
> hanging). As a result, I have
Am Samstag, 10. August 2013, 20:25:46 schrieb Gregory Seidman:
> I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
> showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
> was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a while because it was
> hanging). As
On 08/10/13 17:25, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a while because it was
hanging). As a result, I have purchased
On Aug 11, 2013 at 03:25, Gregory Seidman
wrote:
> I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
> showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
> was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a while because it was
> hanging). As a result, I
I have a low-cost (i.e. old and refurbished) server at home, but it's
showing indications of impending hardware failure (e.g. the on-board NIC
was being reset automatically every 2 seconds for a while because it was
hanging). As a result, I have purchased a new (old and refurbished)
machine. The di
On my local network /usr/local is common to every system via NFS. This method
has served well until I added 64bit machines. Now /usr/local/lib and .../bin
are problematic. The dilemma is common to all multi-platform shops, so I
figure its been solved long ago. I bow to the wisdom real sysad
bc.so, so 32 bit C programs work fine.
David Gluss
-Original Message-
From: ccostin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:27 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: 32<->64
32 bit x86 packages can installed on 64 bit system (amd64) ?
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:27:27AM +0200, ccostin wrote:
> 32 bit x86 packages can installed on 64 bit system (amd64) ?
>
>
use chroot.
Google search for it.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
32 bit x86 packages can installed on 64 bit system (amd64) ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
57 matches
Mail list logo
