Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-03 Thread Dejan Ribič
Dne 3.8.2011 2:30, piše Dave Witbrodt: On 08/02/2011 07:45 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:44:46 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote: My understanding is that the Debian Kernel Team recommends using the 'make deb-pkg' target now; they argued that kernel-package should be consider

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-03 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 8/2/2011 6:56 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote: > On 08/02/2011 04:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> On 8/1/2011 9:44 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote: >> >>> I was a long-time user of make-kpkg, but since I learned how to use the >>> in-kernel deb-pkg target I have been taking the Debian Kernel Team's >>> advice an

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-02 Thread Stephen Powell
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:30:01 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> I don't like "make deb-pkg" that well for a number of reasons. One of >> them is that I get a linux-headers-* package and a libc-dev package too, >> whether I want them or not. make-kpkg is more flexible. I

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-02 Thread Dave Witbrodt
On 08/02/2011 07:45 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:44:46 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote: My understanding is that the Debian Kernel Team recommends using the 'make deb-pkg' target now; they argued that kernel-package should be considered deprecated, but Manoj wanted to conti

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-02 Thread Dave Witbrodt
On 08/02/2011 04:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 8/1/2011 9:44 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote: I was a long-time user of make-kpkg, but since I learned how to use the in-kernel deb-pkg target I have been taking the Debian Kernel Team's advice and recommending building custom kernels that way. As was

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-02 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:44:46 -0400 (EDT), Dave Witbrodt wrote: > > My understanding is that the Debian Kernel Team recommends using the > 'make deb-pkg' target now; they argued that kernel-package should be > considered deprecated, but Manoj wanted to continue supporting it since > so many peop

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-02 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 8/1/2011 9:44 PM, Dave Witbrodt wrote: > I was a long-time user of make-kpkg, but since I learned how to use the > in-kernel deb-pkg target I have been taking the Debian Kernel Team's > advice and recommending building custom kernels that way. As was I. One downside (depending on how you look

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-01 Thread Dave Witbrodt
On 08/01/2011 08:21 PM, Stephen Powell wrote: I haven't tried this out myself yet, but this may be another symptom of Debian bug report 635536. (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635563). At the very least, the above bug report illustrates that there are known problems with kernel-

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-01 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:58:10 -0400 (EDT), tadziu wrote: > > anybody had the same issue? whole compilation goes fine, > but when it comes to creating packages it terminates with > following error: > > /usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \ > -C Documentation/lguest > make: *** Documentation

Re: 3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* tadziu [110801 18:58 +0200]: > hi, > > anybody had the same issue? whole compilation goes fine, > but when it comes to creating packages it terminates with > following error: > > /usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \ > -C Documentation/lguest > make: *** Documentation/lguest: No such f

3.0 kernel fails to compile

2011-08-01 Thread tadziu
hi, anybody had the same issue? whole compilation goes fine, but when it comes to creating packages it terminates with following error: /usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \ -C Documentation/lguest make: *** Documentation/lguest: No such file or directory. Stop. make: *** [debian/stamp/b