On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:51:57 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:04:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> | On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:53:16 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 02:26:58AM -0800, ben wrote:
> | > | On Saturday 23 February 2002 0
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:04:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:53:16 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 02:26:58AM -0800, ben wrote:
| > | On Saturday 23 February 2002 06:53 pm, Bob Underwood wrote:
| > | [snip]
| > | > >
| > | > > | Is the Star
Thanks for all the contributions. I am glad the thread moved also to the
lack of a mail merge capable word processor apart from SO. WP8 can do
merges but has no address book included, at least the download version I
have, but I forgot that merges are possible with the little data base
equivale
"Andreas" == Andreas von Heydwolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Would it make a difference in performance on the 233MHz
Andreas> MMX CPU and 48Mb RAM system whether I choose potato or
Andreas> Woody?
I run woody on a 48 Mb Tecra 700ct I got real cheap (1 USD) with a 120
M
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:35:11 -0800 (PST) "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > But then then The Average User would have to learn the tools
> (read:
> > programming languages). It's been an end-user operation for 20
> > years (going back to WordStar 2.x) even on a nerdy OS like CP/M.
>
>
> But then then The Average User would have to learn the tools
(read:
> programming languages). It's been an end-user operation for 20
> years (going back to WordStar 2.x) even on a nerdy OS like CP/M.
i wouldn't consider myself an average user, i use linux/unix
everywhere and have been usin
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:53:16 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 02:26:58AM -0800, ben wrote:
> | On Saturday 23 February 2002 06:53 pm, Bob Underwood wrote:
> | [snip]
> | > >
> | > > | Is the Star Office 5.2 address book reliable enough for mail merges,
> or
> | > >
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 02:26:58AM -0800, ben wrote:
| On Saturday 23 February 2002 06:53 pm, Bob Underwood wrote:
| [snip]
| > >
| > > | Is the Star Office 5.2 address book reliable enough for mail merges, or
| > > | has any other word processor (Applixware?) an address book that can be
| > > | us
Dear Andreas,
IMHO StarOffice is the best word processor around. It can also do mail merges,
with addressbook or any database you set up.
However, it may be slow on your system. (I have 800 MHz, 128 MB and it runs
very well.)
You may want to try StarOffice / OpenOffice 6.0 . It is said to be fas
On Saturday 23 February 2002 06:53 pm, Bob Underwood wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > | Is the Star Office 5.2 address book reliable enough for mail merges, or
> > | has any other word processor (Applixware?) an address book that can be
> > | used for mail merges?
> >
the subject of DOS style mail-merge capab
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 01:42:21 +0100 Andreas von Heydwolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:22:01 +0100 Andreas von Heydwolff <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
[big snip]
> I looked at Sylpheed and liked it the other day, is it already stable
> en
On Saturday 23 February 2002 19:59, dman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:22:01AM +0100, Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
> | Am fed up with Windows on a single workstation in a small non-profit
> | organization, used mainly for word processing and mailing. This weekend
> | I have to reinstall the O
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:22:01AM +0100, Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
| Am fed up with Windows on a single workstation in a small non-profit
| organization, used mainly for word processing and mailing. This weekend
| I have to reinstall the OS, data are on a second HDD since the last
| major cr
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:22:01 +0100 Andreas von Heydwolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Am fed up with Windows on a single workstation in a small non-profit
organization, used mainly for word processing and mailing. This weekend
I have to reinstall the OS, data are on a second
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:22:01 +0100 Andreas von Heydwolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am fed up with Windows on a single workstation in a small non-profit
> organization, used mainly for word processing and mailing. This weekend
> I have to reinstall the OS, data are on a second HDD since the l
> Would it make a difference in performance on the 233MHz MMX CPU and
> 48Mb RAM system whether I choose potato or Woody?
i cannot imagine any difference. 48MB ram for star office
IMO is not enough. I wouldn't use it seriously unless I had
at least 128MB ram, even then its slow. The slowest de
Am fed up with Windows on a single workstation in a small non-profit
organization, used mainly for word processing and mailing. This weekend
I have to reinstall the OS, data are on a second HDD since the last
major crash so it won't be too much trouble. I intend to make it dual
boot with Debian
17 matches
Mail list logo
