On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:12:41 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>
> Did you try to start in runlevel 1 (i.e "recovery mode")?
> What happens when you "fsck" your partition?
> Your problem might be the next script (in /etc/rcS.d/).
>
Same thing happens in single user mode. And it doesn't complete
c
Hello,
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 08:12 +, Virgo Pärna wrote:
> When I upgraded my Debian computer form Etch to Lenny, I had to give up
> running 2.6.26 kernel for following reasons (computer has AMD Sempron 3000+
> CPU).
> [..]
> Now, with 686 kernel, I can no longer bo
not boot (686 version of
2.6.26-2
kernel) or cannot unmount any cifs/smbfs shares as user (amd64 version of
2.6.26-2
kernel). And, while this unmounting problem was there from the beginning, I
could
sucessfully boot earlier 2.6.26 kernel in Lenny. But I cannot boot with
current.
And since ther
Virgo Pärna put forth on 11/7/2009 2:12 AM:
> When I upgraded my Debian computer form Etch to Lenny, I had to give up
> running 2.6.26 kernel for following reasons (computer has AMD Sempron 3000+
> CPU).
> 1. 686 version kernel crashed, when accessing listing files in mounted s
When I upgraded my Debian computer form Etch to Lenny, I had to give up
running 2.6.26 kernel for following reasons (computer has AMD Sempron 3000+
CPU).
1. 686 version kernel crashed, when accessing listing files in mounted share
from Windows 95 computer, if filenames contained accented
On 09/28/2008 02:49 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I did check the settings in .config. Both BLK_DEV_IDE and
BLK_DEV_IDEDISK are set to "y." As for the ATA/SATA settings, they were
not set, but my disk is an older one and should not care, but I tried
setting them and trying again, and I got the
On Sep 28, 2008, at 2:23 AM, debian-user-digest-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
From: "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 28, 2008 12:28:43 AM PDT
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: Problem compiling 2.6.26 kernel
On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I have used
Alex Samad wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:28:43AM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the
kernel-package program that is included with Debian to compile new
kernels. I have an older Athlon PC that h
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:28:43AM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
>> I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the
>> kernel-package program that is included with Debian to compile new
>> kernels. I have an older Athlon PC that has the Rei
On 09/27/2008 10:42 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the
kernel-package program that is included with Debian to compile new
kernels. I have an older Athlon PC that has the Reiserfs 3.6 on it.
After I do the "make-kpkg --revision= ## kernel-ima
I have used Debian for many years and I have always used the kernel-
package program that is included with Debian to compile new kernels.
I have an older Athlon PC that has the Reiserfs 3.6 on it. After I
do the "make-kpkg --revision= ## kernel-image" and then use "dpkg -i"
to install the
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri,25.Jul.08, 19:12:37, Thilo Six wrote:
> > Dale wrote the following on 25.07.2008 17:49
> > > Does anyone here have a idea what the eta is on Debian getting the
> > > 2.6.26 Kernel into unstable?
> > >
> &g
On 07/26/2008 11:48 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Does anyone know if UDF 2.50 will be supported by .26? I've read
that it is, but http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_26 doesn't seem
to have anything about it.
It would seem so. I have 2.6.26 installed, and this is at the top of
./linux-2.6.26/fs/ud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/08 11:48, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 07/25/08 15:01, Thilo Six wrote:
>> Celejar wrote the following on 25.07.2008 21:02
>
>>
>
>>> I don't understand; .26 is not yet in Sid.
>> yes the whole thing is bit more complex. That's why i posted the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/08 15:01, Thilo Six wrote:
> Celejar wrote the following on 25.07.2008 21:02
>
>
>
>> I don't understand; .26 is not yet in Sid.
>
> yes the whole thing is bit more complex. That's why i posted the direction to
> gain a bit more authoritat
All,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone here have a idea what the eta is on Debian getting the
> > > > 2.6.26 Kernel into unstable?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Dale
> > >
> > > There has been a discussion about
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:01:15 +0200
Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Celejar wrote the following on 25.07.2008 21:02
>
>
>
> > I don't understand; .26 is not yet in Sid.
>
> yes the whole thing is bit more complex. That's why i posted the direction to
> gain a bit more authoritative infor
Celejar wrote the following on 25.07.2008 21:02
> I don't understand; .26 is not yet in Sid.
yes the whole thing is bit more complex. That's why i posted the direction to
gain a bit more authoritative information on that matter.
for your convenience:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:09:10 +0300
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri,25.Jul.08, 19:12:37, Thilo Six wrote:
> > Dale wrote the following on 25.07.2008 17:49
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Does anyone here have a idea what the eta i
On Fri,25.Jul.08, 19:12:37, Thilo Six wrote:
> Dale wrote the following on 25.07.2008 17:49
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Does anyone here have a idea what the eta is on Debian getting the
> > 2.6.26 Kernel into unstable?
> >
> > Regards
> > Dale
>
&g
Dale wrote the following on 25.07.2008 17:49
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone here have a idea what the eta is on Debian getting the
> 2.6.26 Kernel into unstable?
>
> Regards
> Dale
There has been a discussion about that this week on -release.
Search for :"imminent 2.6.26
Hi All,
Does anyone here have a idea what the eta is on Debian getting the
2.6.26 Kernel into unstable?
Regards
Dale
--
[WWW] http://southernvaleslug.org/
[IRC] #southern-vales.lug on irc.freenode.net
"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of
thinking we we
22 matches
Mail list logo
