Peter Thomassen wrote:
> I already knew that, but according to the manufacturer's
specification, it's
> not an S-ATA drive, but an UDMA-100 drive. That's why I firstly didn't take
> that into account.
>
> Is this possible at all? Or does it mean that either the model number or the
> specification
Bill Smith wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
So, SATA drives will 'just work' with a 2.6.x kernel?
I am running testing here on a 200G sata drive on an Asus P5P800
no problems at all, though strangely grub would not install, but
lilo did, so it is fine. It is an Intel ICH5 controller.
Thanks to al
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Wackojacko wrote:
AFAIK, this is just due to the difference between how 2.4 and 2.6
kernels deal with SATA drives. 2.4 used ide/scsi emulation so the
appeared as IDE drives, i.e. 'h'da etc. 2.6 has native SATA support
and thus the drives are 's'da etc.
So, SATA drives
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Marc Shapiro wrote:
So, SATA drives will 'just work' with a 2.6.x kernel?
I'm running SATA (1) on:
* ASUS av7600 (non-native)
* Intel 945/ICH7 (native)
* Intel other (powered off at the moment)
In general, things just work... you may have to tell y
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Wackojacko wrote:
AFAIK, this is just due to the difference between how 2.4 and 2.6
kernels deal with SATA drives. 2.4 used ide/scsi emulation so the
appeared as IDE drives, i.e. 'h'da etc. 2.6 has native SATA support
and thus the drives are 's'da etc.
So, SATA drives
Peter Thomassen wrote:
Wackojacko schrieb am Sonntag, 17. September 2006 10:48:
The problem has been solved. My friend uses a Samsung MP0804H (?)
harddisc, whose device file had change from hda to sda with 2.6. :-)
AFAIK, this is just due to the difference between how 2.4 and 2.6
kernels deal w
Wackojacko wrote:
AFAIK, this is just due to the difference between how 2.4 and 2.6
kernels deal with SATA drives. 2.4 used ide/scsi emulation so the
appeared as IDE drives, i.e. 'h'da etc. 2.6 has native SATA support
and thus the drives are 's'da etc.
So, SATA drives will 'just work' with
Wackojacko schrieb am Sonntag, 17. September 2006 10:48:
>> The problem has been solved. My friend uses a Samsung MP0804H (?)
>> harddisc, whose device file had change from hda to sda with 2.6. :-)
>
> AFAIK, this is just due to the difference between how 2.4 and 2.6
> kernels deal with SATA drive
Peter Thomassen wrote:
Hi!
The problem has been solved. My friend uses a Samsung MP0804H (?) harddisc,
whose device file had change from hda to sda with 2.6. :-)
Is there a list of harddisc involved in this change? Maybe, there should be
some easy-to-find info on this (perhaps in a Wiki, don't
Hi!
The problem has been solved. My friend uses a Samsung MP0804H (?) harddisc,
whose device file had change from hda to sda with 2.6. :-)
Is there a list of harddisc involved in this change? Maybe, there should be
some easy-to-find info on this (perhaps in a Wiki, don't know if one
exists).
Pet
Kent West schrieb am Samstag, 16. September 2006 01:23:
> What filesystem was used? ext2,3, reiser, etc
ext3.
> What are the partitions on the drive?
Before Linux installation:
1 NTFS
2 NTFS
3 NTFS
After:
1 NTFS
2 ext3
3 swap
4 NTFS
(The numbers don't correspond to the partition numbers in /
Peter Thomassen wrote:
Hello,
I helped a friend of mine with installing Debian by phone, that's why my
diagnostic possibilities are shortened.
After downloading the stable netinst CD, we installed sarge (using Kernel
2.4.27 or so). Then, we modified sources.list to use testing in the future
and
Hello,
I helped a friend of mine with installing Debian by phone, that's why my
diagnostic possibilities are shortened.
After downloading the stable netinst CD, we installed sarge (using Kernel
2.4.27 or so). Then, we modified sources.list to use testing in the future
and did an apt-get dist-upgr
Hello,
I helped a friend of mine with installing Debian by phone, that's why my
diagnostic possibilities are shortened.
After downloading the stable netinst CD, we installed sarge (using Kernel
2.4.27 or so). Then, we modified sources.list to use testing in the future
and did an apt-get dist-upgr
14 matches
Mail list logo
