Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-17 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _Jules Dubois_, on 15/07/05 14:37,typed: > > You can downgrade to udev 0.056-3, and put udev 0.062-4 on hold for the > present. > > That is exactly what I did. thanks, ->HS -- Please remove the underscores ( the '_' symbols) from my email address to obtain the correct one. Apol

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread Jules Dubois
On Friday 15 July 2005 07:26, H. S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > > How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that > 2.6.12 is required for the new version? The package description says "requires a kernel not older than 2.6.12." > We upgraded a Sid

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _Paul Scott_, on 07/15/2005 12:37 PM,typed: H. S. wrote: Apparently, _H. S._, on 15/07/05 09:26,typed: How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine running 2.6.11 and got new version of

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:10:16 -0400, Brendan wrote: > Well, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy then, isn't it? If he thinks it should > be unstable, he doesn't do anything to change it, and it *becomes* unstable. He certainly contributed to its instability, yes. -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread Paul Scott
H. S. wrote: Apparently, _H. S._, on 15/07/05 09:26,typed: How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev with no dependency indication that 2.6.12 is require

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread Brendan
On Friday 15 July 2005 10:19 am, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:26:44 -0400, H. S. wrote: > > How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that > > 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine > > running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev wit

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:26:44 -0400, H. S. wrote: > How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that > 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine > running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev with no dependency indication > that 2.6.12 is required. The u

Re: 2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _H. S._, on 15/07/05 09:26,typed: > How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that > 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine > running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev with no dependency indication > that 2.6.12 is required. > > > -

2.6.11 and udev

2005-07-15 Thread H. S.
How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev with no dependency indication that 2.6.12 is required. ->HS -- Please remove the underscores ( the '_' symbols)