Re: 2.4.3 + X 4.0.2 + star office = dead box

2001-04-17 Thread Erik Steffl
"Gerd Bürger" wrote: > > Hi, > > >Try running an xosview and watching your usage creep up. If you're > >really desperate to use StarOffice, try adding an extra swapfile as > >described in mkswap(8) and swapon(8). > > Same problem for me. I only have 8Mb memory and 30Mb swap. vmstat > shows the

Re: 2.4.3 + X 4.0.2 + star office = dead box

2001-04-17 Thread Bürger
Hi, >Try running an xosview and watching your usage creep up. If you're >really desperate to use StarOffice, try adding an extra swapfile as >described in mkswap(8) and swapon(8). Same problem for me. I only have 8Mb memory and 30Mb swap. vmstat shows the swapping (very!) slowly increasing, with

Re: 2.4.3 + X 4.0.2 + star office = dead box

2001-04-04 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:12:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > not quite sure who to blame on this one, x? kernel? star office? > > whenever I start up star office installer, machine bombs. > > if I export my display from remote host -> troubled box and run star > office from remote host, t

Re: 2.4.3 + X 4.0.2 + star office = dead box

2001-04-03 Thread Nate Amsden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > not quite sure who to blame on this one, x? kernel? star office? > > whenever I start up star office installer, machine bombs. make sure the binary your running is a valid binary, id say copy it to another machine and try to run it and see if it works ok. if the bina

2.4.3 + X 4.0.2 + star office = dead box

2001-04-03 Thread Jeff
not quite sure who to blame on this one, x? kernel? star office? whenever I start up star office installer, machine bombs. if I export my display from remote host -> troubled box and run star office from remote host, troubled box bombs. it's not my window manager, i've tried three. same effect.