RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-25 Thread deFreese, Barry
gy doesn't make you less stupid; it just makes you stupid faster." Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell -Original Message- From: Manoj Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 6:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running

Re: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Barry" == deFreese, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Barry> I tried to use make-kpkg but it kept failing Could you offer a few details? Perhaps file a bug against kernel-package about what failed? manoj -- I have a VISION! It's a RANCID double-FISHWICH on an ENRICHED BU

RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-22 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 at 3:15pm, nate wrote: :deFreese, Barry said: :> nate, :> :> Thanks for the reply. That's whats odd. (Remember I'm a total newbie :> here) I pulled the kernel building HOWTO off of the Debian site but most :> of the references were to RedHat so I'm a little confused. I tried

RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-22 Thread nate
deFreese, Barry said: > nate, > > Thanks for the reply. That's whats odd. (Remember I'm a total newbie > here) I pulled the kernel building HOWTO off of the Debian site but most > of the references were to RedHat so I'm a little confused. I tried to use > make-kpkg but it kept failing so I did j

RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-22 Thread deFreese, Barry
riday, November 22, 2002 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question deFreese, Barry said: > O.K. I compiled a new kernel with 2.4.18 SMP and I can now see both > processors under /proc/cpuinfo and I was able to build in the Compaq array > dr

RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-22 Thread nate
deFreese, Barry said: > O.K. I compiled a new kernel with 2.4.18 SMP and I can now see both > processors under /proc/cpuinfo and I was able to build in the Compaq array > drivers. It is kicking butt. > > The question that I now have is that it appears to have re-configured and > re-run LILO for me

RE: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel - Running but have a question

2002-11-22 Thread deFreese, Barry
O.K. I compiled a new kernel with 2.4.18 SMP and I can now see both processors under /proc/cpuinfo and I was able to build in the Compaq array drivers. It is kicking butt. The question that I now have is that it appears to have re-configured and re-run LILO for me but the kernel images is not in

Re: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel

2002-11-22 Thread nate
deFreese, Barry said: > To the Gods of Debian, > > O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist > upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel > installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the > kernel-source-2.4.18 a

Re: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel

2002-11-22 Thread Doug MacFarlane
On 22 Nov 2002, 09:17:49, deFreese, Barry wrote: > O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist > upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel > installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the > kernel-source-2.4.18 a

Re: 2.4.18 SMP Kernel

2002-11-22 Thread Bob Hauck
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, deFreese, Barry wrote: > To the Gods of Debian, > > O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist > upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel > installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the >

2.4.18 SMP Kernel

2002-11-22 Thread deFreese, Barry
To the Gods of Debian, O.K., so I got the Proliant 1600 up and running with Potato. Did a dist upgrade to Woody and yesterday I realized that I don't have the SMP kernel installed. I have pulled down the kernel-header-2.4.18-686-SMP and the kernel-source-2.4.18 and am getting ready to build my n