rting working.
Jon
- Original Message
From: Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian User
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 10:22:09 PM
Subject: Re: CGI Scripts, Apache 2.2.3, and Debian 4.0 R1
Jon D. Irish wrote:
I have a clean install of Debian 4.0 R1 with Apache 2.2.3-
Jon
- Original Message
From: Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian User
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 10:22:09 PM
Subject: Re: CGI Scripts, Apache 2.2.3, and Debian 4.0 R1
Jon D. Irish wrote:
> I have a clean install of Debian 4.0 R1 with Apache 2.2.3-4 installed. I can
- Original Message
From: Mark Grieveson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 9:37:41 AM
Subject: Re: CGI Scripts, Apache 2.2.3, and Debian 4.0 R1
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:05:04 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allo
Jon D. Irish wrote:
I have a clean install of Debian 4.0 R1 with Apache 2.2.3-4 installed. I can
not get cgi scripts to execute from the website. I have researched the Apache
site and tried both of the following:
1) Under apache2.conf, I added
Options +ExecCGI
AddHandler
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:29:26 -0800 (PST)
"Jon D. Irish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Still no luck. I keep getting "The webpage cannot be found" errors.
> Is it possible that I am missing an Apache package? Here are my
> index,html and config files (if it would help).
>
> Thanks,
> Jo
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 9:37:41 AM
Subject: Re: CGI Scripts, Apache 2.2.3, and Debian 4.0 R1
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:05:04 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>AllowOverride None
>Options Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks
>Or
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 08:05:04 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> AllowOverride None
> Options Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks
> Order deny,allow
> Deny from all
> Allow from 192.168.1
>
>
> Neither of these has allowed my cgi scripts to run. Can som
I have a clean install of Debian 4.0 R1 with Apache 2.2.3-4 installed. I can
not get cgi scripts to execute from the website. I have researched the Apache
site and tried both of the following:
1) Under apache2.conf, I added
Options +ExecCGI
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi .pl
Edward,
Thanks for answering!
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:49:20AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > since the change from apache 2.0 to 2.2 was made with debian
> > unstable, I have not been able to get php (4 or 5) working as an
> > apache 2.2 module.
> >
> > Until before the change
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:49:20AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> since the change from apache 2.0 to 2.2 was made with debian
> unstable, I have not been able to get php (4 or 5) working as an
> apache 2.2 module.
>
> Until before the change, I have been operating a wiki and made
> heav
Dear all,
since the change from apache 2.0 to 2.2 was made with debian
unstable, I have not been able to get php (4 or 5) working as an
apache 2.2 module.
Until before the change, I have been operating a wiki and made
heavily use of php for dynamic web-pages.
Therefore, I kindly ask you for any
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 06:33:38AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've encountered a very strange problem after a re-install of my
> server with the new Debian Apache2 2.2.3-2 from testing
> (prefork type because of PHP5).
>
> The first problem was that li
Hello,
I've encountered a very strange problem after a re-install of my
server with the new Debian Apache2 2.2.3-2 from testing
(prefork type because of PHP5).
The first problem was that libapr1 did not work with my 2.4 kernel
(lots of segmentation fault errors), so I compiled a new version
Dear all,
can anyone give me any help on how to reactivate PHP with Apache 2.2.3
in Debian unstable?
I have tried php4 and php5 packages of Debian, set the respective
symlinks to /etc/apache2/mods-enabled and, yes, I restarted apache
about a hundred times during the last night :¦
Is it the
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> without success I have been trying to get php4 or php5 working with
> Debian unstable's Apache 2.2.3 server.
Hi Lukas,
Have you tried looking over the recent bug reports at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=a
Dear all,
without success I have been trying to get php4 or php5 working with
Debian unstable's Apache 2.2.3 server.
While in both cases, 'apache2_ctl -M' reported shared php4_module or
php5_module respectively, my php-pages do not get executed properly --
but Mozilla offres t
Lukas Ruf wrote:
> a couple of days ago I made the mistake to allow dselect to upgrade
> from Apache 2.0.55 to 2.2.3. Since then, I only run with problems,
> neither PHP, Python nor SSIs/CGIs work as they did smoothly before.
I am affected by the same problem. In my case, OpenGroupware
Dear all,
a couple of days ago I made the mistake to allow dselect to upgrade
from Apache 2.0.55 to 2.2.3. Since then, I only run with problems,
neither PHP, Python nor SSIs/CGIs work as they did smoothly before.
Hence my question: How can I fallback to good 2.0 series of Apache
while keeping
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:05 +0200, Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded evolution 2.0.2 and the exchange connector.
> I am using debian sarge now.
> How can i upgrade to sid without reinstalling everything ?
By reading my 8:30AM (GMT -0400) message I am pasting down below just
: Re: GAL 2.2 ==> GAL 2.2.3
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 13:31 +0200, Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to install gal 2.2.3 for a software package.
> I downloaded gal 2.2.3 and did a ./configure, make and make
> install...no problems.
>
> When i run the config
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 13:31 +0200, Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to install gal 2.2.3 for a software package.
> I downloaded gal 2.2.3 and did a ./configure, make and make install...no
> problems.
>
> When i run the configuration of the progra
Hi,
I need to install gal 2.2.3 for a software package.
I downloaded gal 2.2.3 and did a ./configure, make and make install...no
problems.
When i run the configuration of the program that needs 2.2.3 i get:
configure: error: Library requirements (glib-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 >=
2.4.2 gnome-
Hi,
is there a python 2.2.3 backport for woody?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be upgrading our Samba server from the 2.2.3a in Debian stable to
2.2.8a from www.perrier.eu.org. Is there anything I should watch out
for when making this upgrade jump?
The reason for the upgrade is a problem we ran into when using Dfs, ACLs
and Windows 9x clients; the 9x clients are hav
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/base/libc6.html
- Original Message -
From: "Gerard Robin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:25 AM
Subject: libc6 > 2.2.3
> hello,
> can someone point me where I can find
> the package libc6_2.2.4
hello,
can someone point me where I can find
the package libc6_2.2.4-4.deb ?
TIA
--
Gerard
>You can achieve the subscription through the www.debian.org web site.=20
> =20=20=20
> =20=20=20
> ,
> | Franck> Hi ! My PC is a K6-2 500 MHz with 64Mb of SDRAM (PC100),
> | Franck> I use an ATAPI =3D interface for my CDROM reader, and I
> | Franck>
x27;t got any SCSI peripherals. I boot from my ATAPI
| Franck> CDROM from the Debian 2.2.3 CDs.
|
| Franck> At the boot, i can read the boot menu, there is the "boot
| Franck> :" prompt and = when I press enter, i can see "Loading
| Franck> linux ...
e and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report and tell us which package
the report is on. For help, check out http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.html.
Your message was dated Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:37:30 +0100 and had
message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject Debian 2.2.3 :
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 13:12, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Speak after me:
> Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable...
I know :-)
> I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel...
OK I will do this!
> http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb or wait
> for a fi
#include
Severin Olloz wrote on Tue Aug 14, 2001 um 12:58:01PM:
> I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10
> package!
Speak after me:
Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable...
I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel...
Hello...
I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10
package!
When I want to start apache wit php4-support, I become this error-message:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:
/usr/lib/libpcre.so.3: undefined symbol: atexit
Somebody
In about 20 minutes, you can download this package:
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb
size: 3413348
md5sum: 7d4535a0bb44145b098751d6959c3679
It solves the problem with the missing atexit symbol. I'll be uploading
a 2.2.3-11 soonish.
Please refrain from f
I'm trying to setup a machine for development and I just can't get
glibc-2.2.3 to build on potato.
>>>>background
In the past I've used debian-unstable for doing development, the
trouble is I find that, well, too unstable.
I considered using debian-testing but the st
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 01:09:20PM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> > elm:# dpkg --configure libc6
> > Setting up libc6 (2.2.3-7) ...
> > date: invalid date `Mon Jul 23 07:32:48 WST 2001'
> > dpkg: error processing libc6 (--
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Lindsay Allen wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> elm:# dpkg --configure libc6
> Setting up libc6 (2.2.3-7) ...
> date: invalid date `Mon Jul 23 07:32:48 WST 2001'
> dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned
ausing X11 to shut down.
Alan Davis
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:37:01 +0800 (WST)
Lindsay Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> elm:# dpkg --configure libc6
> Setting up libc6 (2.2.3-7) ...
> date: invalid date `Mon Jul 23 07:32:48 WST 2001'
>
Hello all,
elm:# dpkg --configure libc6
Setting up libc6 (2.2.3-7) ...
date: invalid date `Mon Jul 23 07:32:48 WST 2001'
dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
libc6
This ha
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 10:08:16PM +0100, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
> Hi,
> I searched and searched but didn't find any qt packages for debian. Does
> anybody know, where to download them?
>
> Please reply to my e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I'm not on debian-user.
try
http://p
Hans-Christian Armingeon writes:
> I searched and searched but didn't find any qt packages for debian. Does
> anybody know, where to download them?
>From your favorite Debian mirror:
Package: libqt2
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 3538
Mai
On Friday 29 December 2000 15:08, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
> Hi,
> I searched and searched but didn't find any qt packages for debian.
> Does anybody know, where to download them?
>
> Please reply to my e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I'm not on
> debian-user.
http://kde.tdyc.com
--
Bud
Hi,
I searched and searched but didn't find any qt packages for debian. Does
anybody know, where to download them?
Please reply to my e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I'm not on debian-user.
Thanks Johnny
> > Apr 11 13:59:43 valis modprobe: can't locate module char-major-14
> Alias this in /etc/conf.modules. For my SoundBlaster16, I have:
You mean *manually*? Not done automagically by the package manager? Oh well,
and I was getting so excited about how easy make-kpkg makes recompiling a
kerne
> Apr 11 13:59:43 valis modprobe: can't locate module char-major-14
Alias this in /etc/conf.modules. For my SoundBlaster16, I have:
alias char-major-14 sb
post-install sb /sbin/modprobe "-k" "adlib_card"
options sb io=0x220 irq=5 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x330
options adlib_card io=0x388 # FM sy
Jason Stokes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JS> In order to get sound support for my SB Ensoniq AudioPCI 32, I
JS> compiled a custom 2.2.3 kernel with make-kpkg and installed it.
JS> Alas, the new module interface isn't functioning correctly.
(Actually, it sounds like kmod is i
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 02:03:31PM +1000, Jason Stokes wrote:
> Certain modules hang around in the
> kernel forever, even when they aren't being used, and are never flushed (eg
> ppa, the Zip parallel port driver)
Do an lsmod. Do the offending modules have a use count of 0, the
"(autoclean)" fl
In order to get sound support for my SB Ensoniq AudioPCI 32, I compiled a
custom 2.2.3 kernel with make-kpkg and installed it. Alas, the new module
interface isn't functioning correctly. Certain modules hang around in the
kernel forever, even when they aren't being used, and are nev
In order to get sound support for my SB Ensoniq AudioPCI 32, I compiled a
custom 2.2.3 kernel with make-kpkg and installed it. Alas, the new module
interface isn't functioning correctly. Certain unused modules are autoloaded
on startup, and are never flushed, while others (soundcore, e
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Jaroslaw Berezowski wrote:
> I have a trouble with 2.2.3 kernel (updated from 2.0.36).
> During system shutdown when unmounting root filesystem
> sometimes I get message that it's busy and can't be unmounted.
> Why? Scripts stop all daemons and othe
I have a trouble with 2.2.3 kernel (updated from 2.0.36).
During system shutdown when unmounting root filesystem
sometimes I get message that it's busy and can't be unmounted.
Why? Scripts stop all daemons and other processes are killed.
Does somebody else have such problem?
Subject: Kernel 2.2.3 & Kernel Panic...
Date: Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0400
In reply to:Brant Wells
Quoting Brant Wells([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Howdy All!
>
> I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a
> problem... After I run
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 03:45:15PM -0400, Brant Wells wrote:
> Howdy All...
>
> My Linux box is running on an ext2 partition.
>
> I use 'make install' , because it automatically makes the necessary changes
> for
> me, plus the fact that the last time I tried 'make zImage', it wiped out my
> Hard
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Brant Wells wrote:
> Howdy All!
>
> I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a
> problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make
> dep; make install'... I then
Howdy All...
My Linux box is running on an ext2 partition.
I use 'make install' , because it automatically makes the necessary changes for
me, plus the fact that the last time I tried 'make zImage', it wiped out my
Hard Drive when I installed it.
I just went back and looked at the setup in 'menu
Howdy All!
I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a
problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make
dep; make install'... I then make a boot file for the NT Boot Manager...
When I get the NT Boot Manager to go to Linux, Eve
well. You must have untar'ed 2.2.3 on top of
an existing (old) kernel source. Remove the directory /usr/src/linux
and go through the kernel installation procedure again.
Dennis
--
Dennis Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Adminstrator
College of Engineering, MSU
353-4844 (phone)
222-5875 (pager)
make zImage
gives me the following error
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2
-malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=686 -c -o checksum.o
checksum.c
checksum.c:200: redefinition of `csum_p
make zImage
gives me the following error
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2
-malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=686 -c -o checksum.o
checksum.c
checksum.c:200: redefinition of `csum_p
:27PM -0600, Craig T. Hancock wrote:
> Well I complied the the ethernet card directly into my source. I know
> that the kernel recognizes the ethernet card but.. It doesn't get
> anytype of network connectivity what so ever . And I did a ifconfig -a
> under the 2.2.3 and I saw the
Well I complied the the ethernet card directly into my source. I know that the
kernel
recognizes the ethernet card but.. It doesn't get anytype of network
connectivity
what so ever . And I did a ifconfig -a under the 2.2.3
and I saw the device but no address was assigned to it so I just pl
Well netwroking works if I do ifconfig and route stuff manually but I cand
get my dhcpcd client to work at all
so... that is what I ma think I am using the deb but I am thinking about
downloading the source. And I never use modules because I can never ever get
them to work right
"Gregory T. Norr
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 08:45:51PM -0600, Craig T. Hancock wrote:
> Hell oall I just upgraded my kernel and I have a 3com 900 series card
>
> The recofnized the card but.. I still don't any network connectivity is
> there a driver update for the card that I ma not aware of
As far as I know, there
Hell oall I just upgraded my kernel and I have a 3com 900 series card
The recofnized the card but.. I still don't any network connectivity is
there a driver update for the card that I ma not aware of
this help since the messsage quoted below is first
issued in runlevel 1
> > Using Debian 2.0r4 and kernel 2.2.3 I am getting problems if I use my
> > second 64 MB RAM Dimm module. I tested it with both modules so there isn't
> > a faulty one involved. I had the same problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> There could be several of such messages during the boot stage. The worst
>> happens if I shutdown the system. After the line
>> INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel
This is interesting. A Red Hat 5.1 system I am working on for a frie
00:46:32 +0100
> From: Werner Reisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: can't use RAM > 64 MB with 2.2.3 kernel
> Resent-Date: 14 Mar 1999 23:48:36 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not s
Using Debian 2.0r4 and kernel 2.2.3 I am getting problems if I use my
second 64 MB RAM Dimm module. I tested it with both modules so there isn't
a faulty one involved. I had the same problems with kernel 2.0.34 (using
the kernel parameter "mem=128M") and thought an upgrade would hel
Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
>
> This is done by 'depmod -a'. In my system (slink) I have modutils package
I did that and received a bunch of strange messages for my effort. I
took a look at the Changes file that comes with the kernel sources. I a
have versions of some packages that are older than what
John Leget wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> "depmod -a"
>
> check out "man depmod"
>
> cheers
Thanks, I'll check that out.
--
__ _
Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __
Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 08:39:00PM +, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
>
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, John Leget wrote:
> Seems to work ok here, runnning potata SMP with kernel 2.2.3 also running the
> distributed-net client and top shows full utilisation, i was also using
> xosview but
> that seems to be broken with my current setup :(
You are right, I think i
Hi,
Seems to work ok here, runnning potata SMP with kernel 2.2.3 also running the
distributed-net client and top shows full utilisation, i was also using xosview
but
that seems to be broken with my current setup :(
Interestingly some months back when i went SMP top showed 200% for a while
Hi,
"depmod -a"
check out "man depmod"
cheers
Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me
Has anyone here tried running an SMP system with kernel 2.2.3? If so, can
you get it to use both processors? For some reason, I can get it to
recognize two processors (this shows up in xproc), but top shows that at
most 50% of the CPU is getting used, i.e. only one of the processors. At
first I
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
> empty. I took a look
I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2.2.3/modules.dep and yep, it's
empty. I look
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Date: Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:01:13AM -0600
In reply to:steven walsh
Quoting steven walsh([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2
wondering since
> i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2.2.3 kernel
> from ftp.kernel.org and not have any problems???
> Also, has anyone else packaged these kernels in a deb??
You can just get the patches instead of the whole 2.2.3. Just get the 2.2.2
_and_ the 2.
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote:
[snip]
>
> If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2.2 and 2.2.3
> patches, then the end product *is* 2.2.3. Just tar it up yourself
> and name it as 2.2.3 tgz.
>
>
Details, details. >:)
"See you on the
Yes, there are Linux 2.2x kernels in .deb format at
http://netgod.net/ Follow their 2.2.3 button in the upper
left hand corner of their home page. Version 2.2.3 is the
one you, now, immediately get to but the older 2.2.x
versions are in the archives.
At 3/10/99 08:20 PM , you wrote:
When
steven walsh wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 & 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K
> > for the 2 or > 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice.
> >
>
> On the other hand, i
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
> Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 & 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K
> for the 2 or > 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice.
>
On the other hand, i like having the full tgz around Just In
Case.
"See you on the flip
Subject: Kernel 2.2.3
Date: Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 09:20:04PM -0600
In reply to:Faton Useni
Quoting Faton Useni([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package
> from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I rea
> When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source
> package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that
> there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian.
> I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 o
When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package
from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no
patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since
i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the
85 matches
Mail list logo
