Brendon B wrote:
> Okay, what about md v.90 in kernel >= 2.3.40 or 2.4? I checked 2.3.40 and
> the old raid is in it. Where can i get a kernel that has new raid that is at
> least 2.2.14 or better?
If you're satisfied with 2.2.14, just get the RAID 0.90 patch at
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/rai
> Okay, what about md v.90 in kernel >= 2.3.40 or 2.4? I checked 2.3.40 and
> the old raid is in it. Where can i get a kernel that has new raid that is at
> least 2.2.14 or better?
You can patch (pretty cleanly) 2.2.14 to raid 0.90 support with:
ftp://ftp.fi.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid
AM
To: Adam C Powell IV
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.10-14 i686 SMP: IDE RAID-5 array hangs on mount
[Adam Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> Okay, but the current RAID in 2.2.14 doesn't work now (for SMP), and
> doesn't work right (if it&#x
[Adam Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> Okay, but the current RAID in 2.2.14 doesn't work now (for SMP), and
> doesn't work right (if it's being replaced). I guess one could ask,
> how did this happen?
IIRC, Ingo was rewriting RAID during the Linux 2.1 cycle. Somehow it
didn't make it into the main
Thank you for the replies.
Khimenko Victor wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam C Powell IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> AI> I don't expect it to be perfect- we are human after all- but where
> AI> there are known problems or unmaintained sections of the kernel, please
> AI> document them far and
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Too many people whined. If you use raid use the 0.90 patches. Unfortunately
> a pile of people don't want raid 0.90 in the standard kernel, which is silly.
Pfft. The current in-kernel code is junk compaired to the 0.90.
I think the most correct course of a
> Ask Cox, not me :-) Since Cox is RedHat's employee it looks VERY weird to me
> that RedHat's kernel and "official" Cox's kernel are two such different
> beasts.
2.2.15 and the Red Hat kernel are two different things. They I suspect always
will be. The things vendors want "make it work now" and
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > 1. If you are lucky and have working RAID based on stock 2.2.x (for example
>> > RAID 0 :-) you should be able to upgrade to 2.2.14 without big hassle.
>> > So upgrade to RAID 0.90 in mainstream kernel posponed to 2.4 ...
>>
>> Thanks,
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam C Powell IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
AI> Khimenko Victor wrote:
>> 2. RAID 0.90 need some changes in some important kernel structures and such
>> changes will affect even users without RAID.
>>
>> RedHat 6.1 includes RAID patches anyway so I'm not sure if 2. still can
> > 1. If you are lucky and have working RAID based on stock 2.2.x (for example
> > RAID 0 :-) you should be able to upgrade to 2.2.14 without big hassle.
> > So upgrade to RAID 0.90 in mainstream kernel posponed to 2.4 ...
>
> Thanks, I will do that as soon as possible.
>
> > 2. RAID 0.90 need s
Khimenko Victor wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam C Powell IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> AI> Apologies for the delay, I've been having some email trouble. Future
> followups
> AI> will be a lot quicker.
>
> AI> Khimenko Victor wrote:
>
> >> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam C Powell IV ([EMAIL PR
11 matches
Mail list logo
