Hi,
It works.
You should update a few packages, especially the user-space nfsd.
Have a look on Documentation/Changes. Up to date is 2.2.13
Ciao,
Holger
--
"I'd love to go out with you, but I'm staying home to work on my
cottage cheese sculpture."
make sure your running 2.1r3 of slink and you should have -no- trouble,
anything earlier *might* be missing a package. some things like lsof i
had to recompile for myself.
nate
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, andreas [iso-8859-1] p?lsson wrote:
andrea >Hello.
andrea >
andrea >I have a Slink system which
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I have a Slink system which runs very fine with the 2.0.38 kernel. No
> problems or shutdowns at all.
Ok.
>
> Now I want to use the 2.2.x kernel because of some features, but I want
> to know first if it is possible to run v2.2.x kern
> "andreas" == andreas pålsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
andreas> The other option is to run Potato, since I just need the
andreas> base and enough tools to compile the 2.2 kernel. But
andreas> this system _must_ be stable and I fear Potato ain't
andreas> really there yet.
Hello.
Nice see that it is possible and thanks for the tip.
Looking at the URL you gave me and the installed versions of my packages
I only saw that "Util-linux" was 2.9g but 2.9t was required. Seems like
no big deal.
I have no problem in compiling and installing programs, but I would like
to st
andreas pЕlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a Slink system which runs very fine with the 2.0.38 kernel. No
> problems or shutdowns at all.
> Now I want to use the 2.2.x kernel because of some features, but I want
> to know first if it is possible to run v2.2.x kernel on a Slink system.
>
Hello.
I have a Slink system which runs very fine with the 2.0.38 kernel. No
problems or shutdowns at all.
Now I want to use the 2.2.x kernel because of some features, but I want
to know first if it is possible to run v2.2.x kernel on a Slink system.
And second, which steps do I have to take to
mirek mentioned,
> > But can someone tell me what causes IPX collisons? I get lots of
> >
> > Sep 10 12:49:53 hawkins kernel: IPX: Network number collision 24899
> > Sep 10 12:49:53 hawkins kernel: eth0 802.3 and eth0 802.2
> >
> > messages. Is this me, or is there something wrong o
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 12:52:22PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> mario mentioned,
>
>
> > IPX also has a bug that prevents me to use 2.2. with my slink. I'm using
> > 2.0.38 on the machine that needs IPX support and 2.2 in the rest.
>
> In that case, i'm not going to worry about the problem
mario mentioned,
> > But can someone tell me what causes IPX collisons? I get lots of
>
> This is exactly what happened here. My 2.2. generated a lot of collision
> on the network and I was cut off (my fiber was removed) till I
> downgraded to 2.0.38.
>
> I think 2.2 is the problem. Seems th
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
>
> In that case, i'm not going to worry about the problem that's stopping
> me from booting with 2.2 :)
>
> But can someone tell me what causes IPX collisons? I get lots of
This is exactly what happened here. My 2.2. generated a lot of colli
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Pete Harlan wrote:
>
> >
> > Appletalk disk-serving to our Macs stopped working around 2.2.10 or
> > so. I went back to 2.0.37 and it works again. The above URL didn't
> > mention netatalk. It's the only thing we notic
mario mentioned,
> IPX also has a bug that prevents me to use 2.2. with my slink. I'm using
> 2.0.38 on the machine that needs IPX support and 2.2 in the rest.
In that case, i'm not going to worry about the problem that's stopping me from
booting with 2.2 :)
But can someone tell me what causes
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, John R. Sheets wrote:
>
>
> Does this also apply to the 2.2 kernel in unstable? I was thinking
> about upgrading my kernel, but if that'll prevent me from using ipx, I
> won't bother. (I'm running off a 2.1 dist with a bunch of stuff
> upgraded to unstable, but not the ker
Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>
> IPX also has a bug that prevents me to use 2.2. with my slink. I'm using
> 2.0.38 on the machine that needs IPX support and 2.2 in the rest.
Does this also apply to the 2.2 kernel in unstable? I was thinking
about upgrading my kernel, but if that'll prevent me
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Pete Harlan wrote:
>
> Appletalk disk-serving to our Macs stopped working around 2.2.10 or
> so. I went back to 2.0.37 and it works again. The above URL didn't
> mention netatalk. It's the only thing we noticed breaking when using
> 2.2 with slink.
IPX also has a bug that
> Check out this page for the list of things you need to update
> from potato:
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2
Appletalk disk-serving to our Macs stopped working around 2.2.10 or
so. I went back to 2.0.37 and it works again. The above URL didn't
mention netatalk. I
Pere Camps wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Can I run 2.2.12 on slink without problems or do I have to update
> some packages from potato?
Check out this page for the list of things you need to update
from potato:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2
I'm running Linux 2.2.12. Be
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Pere Camps wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I run 2.2.12 on slink without problems or do I have to update
> some packages from potato?
I'm currently running 2.2.12 on slink, largely without problems. Some
programs need to be updated - be sure to read Documentation/Changes to see
wh
Hi!
Can I run 2.2.12 on slink without problems or do I have to update
some packages from potato?
Thankx!
-- p.
20 matches
Mail list logo
