Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-27 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Saturday 27 September 2014 01:50:02 Steve Litt wrote: > And for every one of us that gets silenced, three more pop up. They don't. Except perhaps in oyur dreams. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/26/2014 07:51 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/26/2014 6:21 PM, John Hasler wrote: Ric Moore writes: Plunk down your money to sue a "club" that you volunteered to join. He isn't a member of the club: he is not a Debian Developer. He's some guy who accepted a gift from the club and is now

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 9/26/2014 8:19 PM, John Hasler wrote: > Jerry Stuckle writes: >> Actually, he might have a case here - at least in the United States. >> The Debian contract lays out some promises; as a user, if he could >> prove those promises were abridged, he could get a judgement against >> Debian and/or the

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:19:46 -0500 John Hasler wrote: > Jerry Stuckle writes: > > Actually, he might have a case here - at least in the United States. > > The Debian contract lays out some promises; as a user, if he could > > prove those promises were abridged, he could get a judgement against >

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread John Hasler
Jerry Stuckle writes: > Actually, he might have a case here - at least in the United States. > The Debian contract lays out some promises; as a user, if he could > prove those promises were abridged, he could get a judgement against > Debian and/or the individual developers. Not a contract. No co

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 9/26/2014 6:21 PM, John Hasler wrote: > Ric Moore writes: >> Plunk down your money to sue a "club" that you volunteered to join. > > He isn't a member of the club: he is not a Debian Developer. He's some > guy who accepted a gift from the club and is now accusing them of fraud > and threatenin

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread John Hasler
Ric Moore writes: > Plunk down your money to sue a "club" that you volunteered to join. He isn't a member of the club: he is not a Debian Developer. He's some guy who accepted a gift from the club and is now accusing them of fraud and threatening to sue because the next gift they offer him may no

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-26 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/26/2014 02:14 AM, Gregory Smith wrote: Also, club or not, common law criminal fraud still applies. Well, prove it then. Plunk down your money to sue a "club" that you volunteered to join. Call 911! Email Eric Holder and tell him how you've been defrauded. I bet the FCC and Homeland Sec

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork (off)

2014-09-26 Thread Scott Ferguson
A lot of fact-free noise, fury and nonsense. On 26/09/14 16:14, Gregory Smith wrote: > First: I hope you are correct. Indeed, it doesn't have solely to do > with init, but this init change to systemd is > the straw that brings everything to the fore. English please. > > There is the disrega

Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-25 Thread Gregory Smith
First: I hope you are correct. Indeed, it doesn't have solely to do with init, but this init change to systemd is the straw that brings everything to the fore. There is the disregard of the users of debian (who are not just users but programmers in various free software projects), a betrayal of th

2 fork or ~2 fork

2014-09-25 Thread Richard Owlett
I suspect that historians will say fork has already occurred. I suspect it will have little to do with init this versus init that. Owl *DUCKS* 4 cover ;/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi