Hi,
> It depends on your routing configuration where the packets go to.
> Could you send the output of
ok. Let's be specific now. This is the setup:
/ \
(
Thomas,
Thomas Gebhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-17 09:47]:
> it is possible to use NAT to do that. My question is, however: is it
> really necessary to use such a heavyweight tool for such a simple
> setup:
>
> 1. Host has 2 NICs
> 2. No forwarding between the two NICs
> 3. Just ensure that
Hi,
> have you checked:
> NAT -- network address translation (aka Masquerading)?
> You will find a lot of helpful information in
yes, as I mentioned briefly
>> Is there an easy and preferred way to accomplish this goal (which
>> seems to be not that uncommon)? Should I use iproute2 or even
>>
Thomas Gebhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 16:43]:
>
>
> This will result in the correct routing table. But there is no
> control of the source ip address leaving eth0 or eth1. It seems
> preferable that all packages going through eth0 are given the
> source ip address 1.2.3.4 and all the pa
Hi,
I'm wondering whether there is a simple and preferred way to configure
the ip parameters for the following situation:
Host A has 2 NICs (say eth0 and eth1), where eth0 is connected to
the LAN and is given the ip address 1.2.3.4. The DNS entry
of host A points to that ip address. In addition,
5 matches
Mail list logo
