On 22 November 2002 at 21:14:00, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> > or is it just a swing-a-dead-chicken-
> > over-your-head-at-midnight-on-a-new-moon-whilst-
> > invoking-eldritch-and-mystic-powers sort of thing?
>
> It could be a board/BIOS problem, or it could be that one of those two
> modul
On 0, Michael Heironimus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have time it might be to your advantage to go ahead and run a
> real memory test. If one of those modules does have a problem you'd be
> better off finding out now instead of later when it causes some other
> strange problem. If you can'
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:59:38AM +0100, Bryan Jurish wrote:
> i can definitely live with this, but can anyone explain
> to me why this must be so? (mainboard/bios bug is my
> personal guess, but i'm truly stumped...) did some
> goofball go and assume that everyone on the planet has
> 2^n bytes
hi Elizabeth, hi list,
first of all, thanks for your suggestions, Elizabeth --
a 'crashme.sh' script was in fact very helpful...
turns out, the machine (same procedure on another box
ran fine) crashed g++ only with my 256MB ram-bar in slot-0
and my 512MB bar in slot-1 ... go figure. each bar al
4 matches
Mail list logo
