the Debianly correct PATH
definition is from someone who has a fetchmail/exim4/procmail/mutt
system running in wheezy, and can simply open up his/her .procmailrc
and copy that line into an email. In this there is too much verbiage
about how I can do whatever I want, and not enough explanation of
what
locally, and procmail running in my $home. I have
> no interest in setting up system-wide (i.e. several users) mail
> delivery since I am the only user of email here. I have been keeping
> the same .procmailrc file from well before the transition from
> exim3 to exim4, making ad hoc
chmail to
> get email from my ISP, exim4 to send outgoing email to my ISP, and
> do other things locally, and procmail running in my $home. I have
> no interest in setting up system-wide (i.e. several users) mail
> delivery since I am the only user of email here. I have been keeping
>
l running in my $home. I have
> no interest in setting up system-wide (i.e. several users) mail
> delivery since I am the only user of email here. I have been keeping
> the same .procmailrc file from well before the transition from
> exim3 to exim4, making ad hoc kludge changes only whe
-wide (i.e. several users) mail
delivery since I am the only user of email here. I have been keeping
the same .procmailrc file from well before the transition from
exim3 to exim4, making ad hoc kludge changes only when absolutely
forced to, and largely without a clue as to what I was doing.
I once had
On Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 21:33:09 +0100, Simon Hollenbach wrote:
>Under recipes there is a sample of a filter used on To and CC at the same
>time, that should suit your needs.
Indeed - but you can do better than that if you want to handle
many Debian lists:
# Sort debian mailing lists i
> So what is the rule to put in to .procmailrc to short all of these
> mails sent to some user. In this case debian-user@lists.debian.org :P
Hi,
You could have really used google on this one. Even bing should find sth...
http://userpages.umbc.edu/~ian/procmail.html
Under recipes ther
Hello,
It seems like someone keep sending mails to mailing-lists via CC.
I got this procmailrc that should short all my incoming mails to
folders, if needed to keep inbox clear of all these mailing-list mails.
So what is the rule to put in to .procmailrc to short all of these
mails sent to
On 01:05 Fri 14 Oct , Willie Gnarlson wrote:
> Hello fellow Debian users,
>
> I upgraded bash on my `testing' machine tonight and 4 hours passed
> before I realize procmail is filtering everything to /dev/null. Right.
>
> Does anyone have any idea why this would be matching on *all* incoming
Hello fellow Debian users,
I upgraded bash on my `testing' machine tonight and 4 hours passed
before I realize procmail is filtering everything to /dev/null. Right.
Does anyone have any idea why this would be matching on *all* incoming
mail? The offending rule:
->8-
==
x27;t know how to reliably differentiate between the accounts in
> procmailrc. There has been some partial progress, though:
>
> Any ideas?
Maybe take a look at the full headers? At least with exim 3, I see a
line starting with:
Received: from pop.somehost.com [ipaddress]
Hi there.
I've been switching ISPs as some of you maybe noticed.
Now I don't know how to reliably differentiate between the accounts in
.procmailrc. There has been some partial progress, though:
(0) I can have two fetchmails running concurrently when I rm
~/.fetchmail.pid manuall
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:56:47PM +, David Turner wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 11:45 am, Stephen wrote:
>
>
>
> > > ---
> > >-- Subject: Nvi saved the file .procmailrc
> &
> On Wednesday 04 February 2004 11:45 am, Stephen wrote:
> > ---
> >-- Subject: Nvi saved the file .procmailrc
> > Body: On Mon Jan 26 16:37:17 2004, the user root was editing a
> > file named /ho
Subject: Nvi saved the file .procmailrc
> Body: On Mon Jan 26 16:37:17 2004, the user root was editing a
> file named /home/david/.procmailrc on the machine anubis,
> when it was saved for recovery. You can recover most, if not
> all, of the changes to this file using the -r op
Hi,
Everyday I get the following message set to me. (the date is always 26th of
jan)
---
Subject: Nvi saved the file .procmailrc
Body: On Mon Jan 26 16:37:17 2004, the user root was editing a
file named
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
> I've tried:
>
> #Debian user
> :0
> * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
>
> But it doesn't work.
Hi Anjun,
this procmailrc contains a few helpful option
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
> I've tried:
>
> #Debian user
> :0
> * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
>
> But it doesn't work.
Hi,
I use for example:
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian
:0:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:14:46PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
> I've tried:
>
> #Debian user
> :0
> * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
>
> But it doesn't work.
>
I use
:0:
* X-Mailing-List: <\/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`echo $MATCH | sed -e '
so mach ich das:
.procmailrc [B---] 37 L:[ 12+21 33/ 60] *(580 / 947b)= . 10 0x0A
# Debian Mailinglisten sortieren
:0
* ^X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maildir/.Mailinglisten.debian-user-german/new
alles noch sehr rudimentär, denn ich hab das mit procmail auch erst
:0:
* ^TOdebian-user
/home/NN/Mail/debian
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:14:46PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
> I've tried:
>
> #Debian user
> :0
> * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
>
> But it doesn't work.
>
> --
> Kjetil Ørbekk <[EMAIL PR
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
This is what I do, and it works like a charm:
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DEBIAN-USER/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Son, 2003-10-05 um 20.14 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
> I've tried:
>
> #Debian user
> :0
> * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
>
> But it doesn't work.
Try this:
:0 H
* ^X-Mailing-List.*debian-user.*
debian
Works For Me (TM).
--
Mat
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:14:46PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
> I've tried:
>
> #Debian user
> :0
> * ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
>
> But it doesn't work.
>
I use :
:0
* ^X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.debian-user/
If you
log (LOGFILE variable, for more
info see procmailrc(5)).
But, for sorting debian lists it is better to use X-Mailing-List
header.
--
Denis.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I make procmail sort out the debian user list?
I've tried:
#Debian user
:0
* ^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian
But it doesn't work.
--
Kjetil Ørbekk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HTML messages won't be read.
Outlook Users: Please remove my entry in you adressbook.
All mail clients suck. This one suck
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:53:36AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:16:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > if I fork bplay several ti
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:16:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > if I fork bplay several times, it doesn't "mix" the sounds: they
> > > still play out synchronous
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > if I fork bplay several times, it doesn't "mix" the sounds: they
> > still play out synchronously, even though the caller isn't blocked.
> >
> > Is there a sound ut
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> if I fork bplay several times, it doesn't "mix" the sounds: they
> still play out synchronously, even though the caller isn't blocked.
>
> Is there a sound utility that will play a WAV file in an "overlapped
> way" -- so that I can
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:22:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > so unless anybody has a better already written sound buffer mixer to
> > recommend, consider this matter closed.
> >
> > Thanks for your attention.
> > -T
> >
> I had a
> if I fork bplay several times, it doesn't "mix" the sounds: they
> still play out synchronously, even though the caller isn't blocked.
I've experienced this with OSS emulation on ALSA. Perhaps playing the
sound with 'aplay' instead helps? If not, consider configuring the
'dmix' plug-in for ALSA
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> so unless anybody has a better already written sound buffer mixer to
> recommend, consider this matter closed.
>
> Thanks for your attention.
> -T
>
I had a sugguestion. have a lock file. so, if your script is about to play
a new sound, it check t
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:45:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:15:40PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> > There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork()
> > the bplay processes, so they don't block.
> >
>
> Okay, I realized I could just ca
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:15:40PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork()
> the bplay processes, so they don't block.
>
Okay, I realized I could just call a bash script that ends in & to play
the sounds async to procmail, that's h
There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork()
the bplay processes, so they don't block.
--
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hi
I'm a procmail newb. I've written a recipie to play a WAV when a
message arrives. It works, it sounds nice, but it's synchronous:
:0 c
* ^X-Mailing-List:.*lists.debian.org*
| /usr/bin/bplay /x/x/click_x.wav
Since this WAV takes ~1 sec to play, procmail blocks 1 sec per message.
It ends up ta
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> If you don't create a directory called $HOME/mail/debian-user, then
> procmail will automatically save mail to an mbox by that name. If
> there's a directory there, it'll default to a maildir (erm, as in the
> mailbox format, as distinct from $MAILDIR).
On 03-09-15 03:10 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi DU,
> I'm new to procmail and I wondered if you can point me in the right
> direction.
> this is my .procmailrc
> --
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail #you'd bette
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:10:43AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm new to procmail and I wondered if you can point me in the right
> direction.
> this is my .procmailrc
> --
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail #you'
Hi DU,
I'm new to procmail and I wondered if you can point me in the right
direction.
this is my .procmailrc
--
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail #you'd better make sure it exists
DEFAULT=$HOME/mbox #completely optional
LOGFILE=$MA
Hello. I'm running procmail v3.22 with postfix on Debian.
My problem: The recipes in the main /etc/procmailrc file work fine but I
also have some .procmailrc files in individual user directories (for
invoking spamassassin, etc). As far as I can tell, procmail is ignoring
these file
e .muttrc, I get the error
> message that "Maildir is not a mailbox".
Makes sense, considering the above. Here's what I do (and yeah, I really
should update my perkypants dotfiles):
Selected settings from ~/.procmailrc:
MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/
DEFAULT=$MAILDIR
Selected settings
Adam asked:
> You'll notice that .procmail uses Maildir to define a mailbox, yet when
> I uncomment the Maildir lines in the .muttrc, I get the error message
> that "Maildir is not a mailbox".
MAILDIR is a *variable* under procmail, not an actual directory. It
makes no sense to reference a direct
Hi, I have been frustrated because messages have not been going into
designated
folders. It may be due to a .procmailrc / .muttrc incompatibility.
Environment variables in .procmailrc are ...
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
DEFAULT=/var/spool/mail/adam
LOCKFILE=$HOME
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
> I've checked that one out. It seems you still need some sed
> tricks.
Hi,
I added your .procmailrc receipe and tested your configuration:
:0 fwh
| sed -e 's/^List-Post:/X-Mailing-List-Post-Address:/I ; s/mailto://'
sedprocmail
And it worke
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 06:22:14 +0100,
Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:24:11 +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why doesn't the f
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:24:11 +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
> >
> > > Why doesn't the following .procmailrc recipe work?
> > >
> > > :0fwh
> >
> > it has t
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:24:11 +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
>
> > Why doesn't the following .procmailrc recipe work?
> >
> > :0fwh
>
> it has to be
>
> :0 fwh
>
> > | sed -e 's/^List-Post:/X-Mailing-Li
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, csj wrote:
> Why doesn't the following .procmailrc recipe work?
>
> :0fwh
it has to be
:0 fwh
> | sed -e 's/^List-Post:/X-Mailing-List-Post-Address:/I ; s/mailto://'
What exactly do you want to do here?
Oliver
--
... don't touch the bang
Why doesn't the following .procmailrc recipe work?
:0fwh
| sed -e 's/^List-Post:/X-Mailing-List-Post-Address:/I ; s/mailto://'
This is supposed to work on the following header:
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
"Sven" == Sven Burgener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Hello If I set up a global /etc/procmailrc file for using
Sven> spamassassin, it seems to be ignored (ie, spamassassin
Sven> doesn't ever get run).
Sven> So is there any setting t
Hello
If I set up a global /etc/procmailrc file for using spamassassin, it
seems to be ignored (ie, spamassassin doesn't ever get run).
So is there any setting that needs to be changed / made to the plain
vanilla exim of the testing distribution to allow this?
Cheers,
Sven
PS: Please C
On Sat, 07 Sep 2002, Attila Csosz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to wrap long lines in .procmailrc? With \ or pressing simply enter?
Hi,
see man procmailex
Oliver
--
... don't touch the bang-bang fruit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hi,
How to wrap long lines in .procmailrc? With \ or pressing simply enter?
Thanks
Attila
--
-
- Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian 3.0 Linux / 2.2.20 / exim -
- PGP key: gpg --keyserver keys.pgp.com --recv-key 0x2cc33acb
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:43:16 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> [...] it used to have 664 permissions but I changed it to:
> >
> >-rw---1 erik erik 660 May 12 19:41
> >/home/erik/.procmailrc
> >
> &g
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:43:16 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
[...] it used to have 664 permissions but I changed it to:
>
>-rw---1 erik erik 660 May 12 19:41
>/home/erik/.procmailrc
>
> and it still complains!
>
> any ideas? TIA.
Could be the permissions o
lhost procmail[24576]: Suspicious rcfile
"/home/erik/.procmailrc"
Sep 30 01:31:07 localhost postfix/local[24575]: 69E441D772:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=local, delay=1, status=sent ("|procmail")
Sep 30 01:31:07 localhost postfix/smtpd[24572]: C4BEE1D773:
client=localhost
on Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:21:15PM -0400, Bill Lovett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> A couple times now I've edited my .procmailrc file, unwittingly
> screwed something up, and only discovered my mistake after a day or
> two goes by with not a peep out of otherwise high traffic lists
y over the .forward
>file mechanism as soon as mail arrives.
>
> But perhaps that is best left for another thread.
>
> > Do you have "DEFAULT" set in your .procmailrc?
>
> I do indeed, and The plot thickens:
>
> MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
> DEFAULT=$M
fo/proctips.html#start
It works, but is somehow less-than-optimal according to the procmail man page:
Procmail should be invoked automatically over the .forward
file mechanism as soon as mail arrives.
But perhaps that is best left for another thread.
> Do you have "DEF
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:21:15PM -0400, Bill Lovett wrote:
| A couple times now I've edited my .procmailrc file, unwittingly
| screwed something up, and only discovered my mistake after a day or
| two goes by with not a peep out of otherwise high traffic lists.
|
| But what happens
A couple times now I've edited my .procmailrc file, unwittingly screwed
something up, and only discovered my mistake after a day or two goes by with
not a peep out of otherwise high traffic lists.
But what happens to a message when procmail gets confused by a broken recipe?
Nothing sho
; "-f '<>'" on the sendmail-command-line to create a
> zero-return-address.
Thanks for the info about this issue. I'll take that into account.
> Why do you want those headers to appear in the message?
I merely want the mail to appear to be destined to "[
On Friday, February 02, 2001 at 18:41:16 (+0100), Sven Burgener wrote:
> --8<--
> :0
> * ^From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
> | (formail -I "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]") |\
> (formail -I "CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]") | $SENDMAIL -t
>
> :0
> ! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --8<--
The first recipy is
Is it possible to specify multiple "action" lines for any given
procmail rule?
Like, say I want to achieve the following requirements:
o rewrite the To: header field such that it will appear as what
I rewrite it at the recepient.
o do the same (or insert) a CC: header field.
o then send
I happened to see this in the www.procmail.org mailing list archives
yesterday. Sorry I don't know the answer off the top of my head, but it's
there.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 04:17:56PM -0600, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> I keep getting a "Suspecious rc file /home/lance/.procmailrc&
I keep getting a "Suspecious rc file /home/lance/.procmailrc" "Coundn't
read rc file" when I fetchmail -m 'procmail' and get mail from my ISP.
I tried creating a .procmailrc from the dotfile generator but I still
got the same message. Anyone know why this is
I have a bash command to reach my ISP
alias getmail="fetchmail -m '/usr/bin/procmail -f - ' "
/home/lance/.procmailrc is 'owner = lance' 'group = lance'
given rwx rwx and other given read-only rights
here is the error I
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 06:38:40PM -0500, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> Now when I use fetchmail and it tries to read my .procmailrc it tells me it
> is a suspicious file and won't read it.
> Anyone know what is going on here? My rights are set to read/write for
> everyone. My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999 18:38:40 -0500, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
>it is in a directory called data (i.e. /data/~).
rmdir \~I think
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 |
I had a directory named '~' the other day and tried to delete it. Needless to
say it started to delete my home directory.
Now when I use fetchmail and it tries to read my .procmailrc it tells me it is
a suspicious file and won't read it.
Anyone know what is going on here?
Catalin Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ---
> 02/04/1998 22:36:19: [m0y0BYR-000I3ZC] Received FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> HO\ST:localhost PROTOCOL:smtp PROGRAM:sendmail ORIG-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SIZE:462
> 02/04/1
Catalin Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's me again. I looked what's in the logfile of smail in an attempt to
> see what is wrong with my .forward and .procmailrc files. I cannot figure
> out what to do next, but it seems to me that it is something wrong
> _b
Hi,
It's me again. I looked what's in the logfile of smail in an attempt to
see what is wrong with my .forward and .procmailrc files. I cannot figure
out what to do next, but it seems to me that it is something wrong
_before_ procmail, so procmail does not get any mail to process.
I
Here's what I want to do:
1) mail addressed to me goes into the inbox (even from mailing lists)
2) mailing lists are separated (already working)
3) remaining messages go into a junk folder
any ideas?
-Paul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTEC
Attached to this letter you will find a procmailrc file. Adjust
the MAILDIR variable and are set.
> Here's what I want to do:
> 1) mail addressed to me goes into the inbox (even from mailing lists)
> 2) mailing lists are separated (already working)
> 3) remaining messag
The Filtering Mail FAQ explains how to set up both procmail and mailagent.
http://www.ii.com/internet/faqs/launchers/mail/filtering-faq/
Cheers,
- Jim
pgpzXLTTlL8Zs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
what I do, except for the junk part, which I've been meaning
to add for a while and just did. I notice most spam has bogus or useless
To: lines, so that makes filtering that nasty stuff all the easier.
Here's an abbreviated version of my .procmailrc:
--- SNIP ---
PATH=$HOME/bin:/usr/l
On Sun, Sep 14, 1997 at 01:02:38AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Attached to this letter you will find a procmailrc file. Adjust
> the MAILDIR variable and are set.
[snip]
> :0
> *(Cc:|From:|To:).*debian-bugs*
> bug
But if you want put all mail *from* the list to t
80 matches
Mail list logo
