Re: ..cc'ing, was: www.debian.org

2003-11-27 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:20:20 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 01:01 GMT, Arnt Karlsen penned: > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:55:52 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: ..cc'ing, was: www.debian.org

2003-11-27 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 01:01 GMT, Arnt Karlsen penned: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:55:52 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> -- monique PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on >> top. Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'

Re: ..cc'ing, was: www.debian.org

2003-11-26 Thread Steve Lamb
Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..another way is use procmail to drop the cc's home where they belong and weed out the duplicates. ..the third other way is chew out anyone who dares abuse _your_ damn bandwidth, _etc_. ;-) This conversation has been done to death several times in the past year. Peruse

..cc'ing, was: www.debian.org

2003-11-26 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:55:52 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -- > monique > PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on top. > Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'm already subscribed!! ..another way is use procmail to dr