On Tuesday 06 February 2007 02:19, Shobhit Jindal sent this for all our
perusal:
>---} Just count one more happy debian user! Reinstalled yesterday, to
> switch ---} > from x86 sarge to amd64 etch. Everything went flawlessly.
Thanks to developers, maintainers, people on this list and everyone wh
some news
myself just installed kernel 2.6.18-4-686 and vmware (vmware-config.pl) was
configured without giving the error
- no linux/version.h in /usr/src/include/linux
not to mention 2.6.18-3-686 and 2.6.18-2-686 did give the error!
On 2/5/07, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Take a look here:
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?messageID=76957&tstart=0
Essentially, vmware in its raw state doesn't compile with relatively newer
kernels. You need patches to make them work. You can find these patches at
http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/vmware .
Once you down
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2/5/07, Shobhit Jindal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2/5/07, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The only
>> > catch ins't debian related: vmware seems to not like my
>> > /usr/src/include/linux, and asks for a new linux/version.h.
>>
>> i have b
Margarita Manterola wrote:
Hi!
On 2/5/07, Shobhit Jindal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only
> catch ins't debian related: vmware seems to not like my
> /usr/src/include/linux, and asks for a new linux/version.h.
i have been stuck to kernel 2
Hi!
On 2/5/07, Shobhit Jindal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only
> catch ins't debian related: vmware seems to not like my
> /usr/src/include/linux, and asks for a new linux/version.h.
i have been stuck to kernel 2.6.18-1-686 for the very sam
a damm happy user here too :)
On 2/5/07, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just count one more happy debian user! Reinstalled yesterday, to switch
from x86 sarge to amd64 etch. Everything went flawlessly.
Downloaded last netinst, booted it, hardware detected smoothly. The
machine has two so
Just count one more happy debian user! Reinstalled yesterday, to switch
from x86 sarge to amd64 etch. Everything went flawlessly.
Downloaded last netinst, booted it, hardware detected smoothly. The
machine has two sound cards, both worked as before. I chose manual disk
editing, reformatted both
Yep,
it sure does rock. I am a recent convert, from SuSE & Mandrake.
Oh, check out Synaptic, it is a most excellent gui front end for all the
CLUE apt stuff.
No, I am not blond, but I am a bit gui. ;-)
*BFN*
H :-)
There is no such thing as an ugly woman -- there are only the ones w
"Bruce Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I just wanted to say that Debian is really just the distro that i've been
>looking for ever since using Redhat two years ago. I still can't believe how
>easy it is to configure packa
Hello all,
I just wanted to say that Debian is really just the distro that i've been
looking for ever since using Redhat two years ago. I still can't believe how
easy it is to configure packages in Debian thanks to deslect and apt.
bp
__
With my workstation here at work passing 1 year of uptime
a few days ago I must say that debian is the most solid OS
for either workstation or server that I have used sofar. I'm
sure some of it comes from the hardware I choose and the software
config. but I am still astounded that this machine has
And Debian Still ROCKS...
-Jonbegin:vcard
n:Bardin;Jon
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
note:www.gamesig.com -uniting the linux gaming community
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Jon Bardin
end:vcard
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:16:08PM +0200, Jason Quigley wrote:
> Interesting!
>
> How does the mailing list get onto USENET? Is there a cross-posting utility
> running? I would much prefer to use a news group than downloading all these
> messages.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason.
i imagine that someone at
nce
Measat Broadcast Network Systems
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit us at: http://www.astro.com.my
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith G. Murphy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 12:57 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: debian r
Interesting!
How does the mailing list get onto USENET? Is there a cross-posting utility
running? I would much prefer to use a news group than downloading all these
messages.
Cheers,
Jason.
--On Tuesday, August 1, 2000 11:57 -0500 "Keith G. Murphy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, "w
or at www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Debian-Linux/199/0
(very up-to-date).
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:57:15AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Actually, "we" could have picked it up on www.deja.com/usenet.
>
> Jason Quigley wrote:
> >
> > Then of course, the fact that we're reading this means we're a
Actually, "we" could have picked it up on www.deja.com/usenet.
Jason Quigley wrote:
>
> Then of course, the fact that we're reading this means we're already on the
> list :)
>
> --On Monday, July 31, 2000 9:40 +0800 "CHEONG, Shu Yang [Patrick]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hear ye..hear y
Then of course, the fact that we're reading this means we're already on the
list :)
--On Monday, July 31, 2000 9:40 +0800 "CHEONG, Shu Yang [Patrick]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hear ye..hear ye.you should join this list, then you'll really get a
feel of the Linux (and Debian GNU/Linux)
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, CHEONG, Shu Yang [Patrick] wrote:
> Hear ye..hear ye.you should join this list, then you'll really get a
> feel of the Linux (and Debian GNU/Linux) community.
I did join! :)
Mike
Message-
> From: Michael Soulier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 1:48 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: debian rocks
>
>
> I have to tell you, the more I use Debian, the more I like
> it. It's not the big things. The b
amen !
I have to tell you, the more I use Debian, the more I like
it. It's not the big things. The big thing is that it's Linux. It's the
little things.
I go hunting for the default vimrc file installed when I grabbed
vim. On every *nix system in the world, it's probably in a subdirector
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 11:19:28AM -0800, Bart Friederichs wrote:
> I have 8M, but the upper 4 are bad. I am just busy installing it now. I
> *know* it is the ram that does it ; ). Maybe I will get me more RAM, hope it
> is easy to get some 30pins SIMMs.
Take a look at http://www.memoryx.com
> Debian does indeed rock but the x windows really need more than 4MB
> of RAM.
I have 8M, but the upper 4 are bad. I am just busy installing it now. I
*know* it is the ram that does it ; ). Maybe I will get me more RAM, hope it
is easy to get some 30pins SIMMs.
> I notice you posted using O
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:18:09PM -0800, Bart Friederichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian rocks! Yeah, only installing it on a 486 with just 4MB of RAM, will
> cost you (until now, he still isn't ready) 3 days That is, for the
> standard workstation. Ahh, what the heck, as lon
I remember having debian running on my 486 SX 33 with 8 Meg in just a few
hours (manually selected dselect).
Ron
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Bart Friederichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian rocks! Yeah, only installing it on a 486 with just 4MB of RAM, will
> cost you (until now, he still isn
Hi,
Debian rocks! Yeah, only installing it on a 486 with just 4MB of RAM, will
cost you (until now, he still isn't ready) 3 days That is, for the
standard workstation. Ahh, what the heck, as long as it runs, I will be
happy.
Grzz
Bart
28 matches
Mail list logo
