Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-14 Thread ricktaylor
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yesterday apt-get maliciously lunched my install (okay, okay, I was > trying to upgrade firestarter even though apt-get told me to file a bug > report because it thought the install was impossible... more on that coming > up soon). :} I'd t

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-14 Thread listcomm
> What are you thinking dselect does for you that apt-get doesn't? well, this is just an anecdote (the singular of data...), but - Yesterday apt-get maliciously lunched my install(okay, okay, I was trying to upgrade firestarter even though apt-get told me to file a bug report because it though

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-14 Thread ricktaylor
> From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aptitude, apt-get and dpkg are more than enough to help me out in a > command line environ. Actually I do not use any other interfaces for > package management. Then... Why are you complaining? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-14 Thread ricktaylor
> From: Steven Satelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:57:43 +, ricktaylor wrote: > > Personally, I'd use kpackage or synaptic in X and dselect in a terminal > > {mainly because synaptic and kpackage are easier to read... the > > I've always found that unless I stick to on

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-14 Thread Brian Nelson
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 06:39, Paul Johnson wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> >> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > DO NOT USE dselect! >> > >> > Why not? >> >> Why are you asking m

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 19:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 16:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Apt-get has MUCH MUCH better dependency handling (yes I know > about t

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Steven Satelle
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:57:43 +, ricktaylor wrote: > > Personally, I'd use kpackage or synaptic in X and dselect in a terminal > {mainly because synaptic and kpackage are easier to read... the I've always found that unless I stick to one package manager - synaptic at the moment, they resolv

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread ricktaylor
> From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 16:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Apt-get has MUCH MUCH better dependency handling (yes I know about that > > > > How's that? > > Mainly apt-get doesn't screw with thin

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 16:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Apt-get has MUCH MUCH better dependency handling (yes I know about that > > How's that? I am subscribed to D-U. Mainly apt-get doesn't screw with things that way dselect does, in its ne

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread ricktaylor
> From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apt-get has MUCH MUCH better dependency handling (yes I know about that How's that? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Clive Menzies
On (13/07/04 13:36), Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > apt-get is flat out much better. Some people are now recommending > > aptitude as it has a more sane handling of suggests and recommends. > > Horses for courses. Aptitude is *far* from a useable product.

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > apt-get is flat out much better. Some people are now recommending > aptitude as it has a more sane handling of suggests and recommends. Horses for courses. Aptitude is *far* from a useable product. -- Thomas Adam = "The Linux Weekend Mechanic"

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 06:39, Paul Johnson wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 22:35, William F. Dudley Jr. wrote: > > > >> >> I was trying to figure out why xsane was dumpi

Re: dselect alternatives

2004-07-13 Thread Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 22:35, William F. Dudley Jr. wrote: > >> >> I was trying to figure out why xsane was dumping core, >> >> and fiddling with package selections using dsele

dselect alternatives

2004-07-12 Thread Paul Johnson
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 22:35, William F. Dudley Jr. wrote: >> I was trying to figure out why xsane was dumping core, >> and fiddling with package selections using dselect, >> and now dselect wants to uninstall most of the packages: > > DO NOT USE dselect!