From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Répondeur automatique [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ceci est un répondeur automatique.
L'email que vous venez d'envoyer à [EMAIL PROTECTED] n'a pas pu arriver à destination
et ne sera donc pas traité.
Merci de le faire transmettre à [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Salutations.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AstroQuick ATTENTION COURRIER NON REMIS !
Par suite d'encombrement votre courrier n'a pu être remis.
Veuillez SVP nous contacter en utilisant notre messagerie en ligne à l'adresse
suivante:
http://www.astroquick.fr/astrologie_astroquick_email.php
Cordialement,
L
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: votre message a sebastien NICOLAS
Bonjour,
Ceci est un répondeur mail. L'adresse que vous tenter de joindre est bloquée à cause
du spam et votre message ne sera pas lu.
Pour me joindre par mail :
http://www.psychologue.fr/contactmail.php
Merci de votre compr
The message "Re: Re: Re: Your document" you sent to ""[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>" had the file attachment "document_4351.pif" which was infected with the
"Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (exact)" virus. The file attachment was quarantined
at "C:\Program Files\Command Software\CSA
Your email was dropped because it may contain a virus or
an unacceptable attachment. If you have any question please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
--- Scan information follows ---
Result: Virus Detected
Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File Attachment: snbmwc.zip
Attachment Status: deleted
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:39:32AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I keep a list of AV vendor email addresses handy which I forward all of
> such misdirected list mails to. Figuring that if enough people do this,
> the AV vendors will take pains that their customers set the products up
> right.
D
on Fri, Nov 22, 2002, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:49:13PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Colin Watson writes:
> > > They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
> > > of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged a
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
In the spirit of being open to the community at large. I don't
particularly see a problem with this, I'm willing to take the good
with the bad.
Though people really ne
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:31:30 -0800
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:16 AM 11/22/02 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
> >
> >If you've been around for a bit
Colin Watson writes:
> It doesn't help that Klez and kin typically forge the envelope sender,
> thus meaning that even correct systems end up appearing like incompetent
> bunglers.
I know that, and so should those who manage the virus scanners. That's why
I'm calling them bunglers for sending not
e lists where people use
Outlook, a non-sub needed policy is an easy way to send out nice
Outlook-targeted attachments!
Of course, now a single "Virus Alert" message has become a thread. So much
for keeping the traffic down...
--
Bill Moseley
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> This list allows non-subscribers to post, right? Why is that?
If you've been around for a bit, you'll have seen really quite frequent
posts from people saying "I can't handle the volume of this list, so I'm
not subscribed; please c
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:49:13PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
> > of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged addresses.
>
> It's irritating that the incompetent bunglers that mana
At 06:49 PM 11/21/02 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>Colin Watson writes:
>> They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
>> of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged addresses.
>
>It's irritating that the incompetent bunglers that manage these so-called
Colin Watson writes:
> They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the source address
> of e-mails, and it's not uncommon for lists to be those forged addresses.
It's irritating that the incompetent bunglers that manage these so-called
"virus scanners" allow them to send out these notice
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:15:55AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Forgive me if this is a fik question, but are these virus warnings of
> any significance? They turn up every now and then, but I've never had
> the list make my virus scanner scream.
They are of no significance. Viruses frequently forge the
Pigeon writes:
> Forgive me if this is a fik question, but are these virus warnings of any
> significance?
No. They are receiving Klez viruses with the mailing-list address forged
in them and their buggy software is sending out those useless notices.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler
Forgive me if this is a fik question, but are these virus warnings of
any significance? They turn up every now and then, but I've never had
the list make my virus scanner scream.
Pigeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 11/21/2002 21:55:50
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:nav-B_portefeuille-2[1].bat
From: debian-user <[
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 11/8/2002 12:4:33
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:Utd..exe
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 11/8/2002 8:59:6
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:financ_busca[1].exe
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTE
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 10/31/2002 5:25:39
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:bgcolor.pif
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 10/3/2002 11:47:10
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:width.pif
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su correo contenía virus en alguno de los anexos. Por favor, si se le
indica que el fichero no se ha podido limpiar y ha sido borrado envíe de
nuevo el correo sin virus. Gracias
Date: 9/23/2002 10:40:15
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:logo[1].exe
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ScanMail has detected a virus during a real-time scan of the email traffic.
Date: 9/3/2002 14:4:58
Subject: A new website
Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H
File:EPLQ800.pif
From: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Action: Uncleanable, Deleted;
Scanned by S
A virus was found in an email from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message was addressed to:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message has been quarantined as:
/var/virusmails/virus-20020901-041027-4062
Here is the output of the scanner:
Scanning /var/amavis/amavis-10795264/parts/*
Scanning file /var/amavi
We have detected a virus (WORM_KLEZ.E) in your mail traffic sent from [EMAIL
PROTECTED] in the file size.scr on 04/12/2002 13:40:01. We took the action
delete. If you have questions regarding files or updating/installing Anti-virus
protection on your PC, please contact your e-mail administrator
Have detected a virus (VBS_HAPTIME.A-1) in your mail traffic on 04/10/2002
19:21:49 with an action deleted. Sys. Admin have been informed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In einer an Sie adressierten Mail von [EMAIL PROTECTED] befand sich ein Virus
(VBS_HAPTIME.A-1) in der Datei Untitled.htm. Es wurde damit folgende Aktion
durchgef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
InterScan has detected a virus TROJ_SKA in your mail traffic on 01/27/2000
20:45:16 with an action cleaned.
InterScan has detected a virus TROJ_SKA in your mail traffic on 01/28/2000
00:39:28 with an action moved.
InterScan has detected a virus TROJ_SKA in your mail traffic on 01/27/2000
17:38:29 with an action moved.
"T.V.Gnanasekaran" wrote:
>
> Ya, true. I saw happy99.exe virus just now. But why anyone would use
> windoze to send mails? what is this interscan anyway?
>
Well, I have to use NT at work, so of course I'm reading/posting with
windows.
Be aware all ppl on this list, One of the emails
from Robert Boyd in the emails from the last 24 hrs, contained the Happy99
virus.
And with regards to Ipfwadm and dcc send on the
slave machine, I find it works perfectly now if i connect to port 6667 of the
irc server, and no other.
I t
Quoting T.V.Gnanasekaran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Ya, true. I saw happy99.exe virus just now. But why anyone would use
> windoze to send mails? what is this interscan anyway?
What an odd question. When I started using linux, I sent/received
all my emails via Pine running on W3.1 using IMAP on a Sun.
Ya, true. I saw happy99.exe virus just now. But why anyone would use
windoze to send mails? what is this interscan anyway?
-gnana
InterScan has detected a virus TROJ_SKA in your mail traffic on 10/18/1999
18:04:58 with an action moved.
On Wed, 21 Aug 1996 02:59:43 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>Vi and clones aren't completely safe, either. In some circumstances, at
>least, they load a .exrc (and/or .vimrc or whatever) from the current
Well, I don't use vi under Linux; only under DOS and OS/2. The Linux
version (Debian installat
and wistfully watch all those files fly by. See ex(1) for details.
Casper Boden-Cummins.
>--
>From: Daniel Lynes[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 19 August 1996 18:54
>To:Debian Users
>Cc:The recipient's address is unknown.
>Subject: Re: [Fwd: Virus Aler
"Rick Macdonald wrote:"
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>
> > : Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
> >
> > Actually, that depends upon your E'mail system. [...]
> >
> > ...but that's a hole in Microsoft mail. Obviously, this kind of thing
> >
"Daniel Lynes":
> GNU Emacs for OS/2 still has this feature. Very, very dangerous.
Vi and clones aren't completely safe, either. In some circumstances, at
least, they load a .exrc (and/or .vimrc or whatever) from the current
directory (not the home directory). The intention is that you can
custom
On Sat, 17 Aug 1996 05:47:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>However, stupid people can also write mail user programs that automatically
>run a program that comes in e-mail. Even more stupid people use such
UltiMail/2 Lite for OS/2 (comes with the Internet Access Kit) has such
a feature. However,
On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> : Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
>
> Actually, that depends upon your E'mail system. Microsoft mail allows
> you to send macros along with messages. These macros are automatically
> run when the message is read.
On Aug 16, 4:44pm, Robbie Honerkamp wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Virus Alert]
:
: Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
:
>-- End of excerpt from Robbie Honerkamp
Actually, that depends upon your E'mail system. Microsoft mail allows
you to send macros alo
> Terry Eck writes:
> I remember reading about this several months ago. It was the opinion
> of most people at the time to be just a joke. Anyone know for sure
> if it is anything other than a joke? Terry
It is. There is even a FAQ about it. I will dig out the URL ...
Dominik
> "Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Eck) writes:
Rob> Well, I'd like to see the code for the infinite loop that'd melt
Rob> down my processor. I've written a few in my time (accidentally),
Rob> and the machine's still here.
Well, lucky you. :-)
> Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
Actually, there is a "Good Times" virus and it does come by email.
The announcement itself _is_ the virus and it spreads _exteremely_
quickly!
For more information, check out the following FAQ:
http://www-mcb.ucdavis.edu/in
On Fri, 16 Aug 1996, Robbie Honerkamp wrote:
> > I remember reading about this several months ago. It was the opinion
> > of most people at the time to be just a joke. Anyone know for sure
> > if it is anything other than a joke?
>
> Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
On Sat, 17 Aug 1996 05:47:04 +0300 Lars Wirzenius ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> GNU Emacs had a similar feature (certain magic lines in a file could
> run any Emacs commands automatically when the file was loaded -- and
> Emacs commands are powerful indeed).
FYI, this is now disabled by default.
Robbie Honerkamp:
> Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
Not true. The Good Times virus is a hoax, but it is possible to get a virus
from e-mail, in some circumstances.
Some e-mail systems allow the sender to tag the contents as being plain
text, HTML, C source code, a s
>Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
>
>Notice that the original post came from AOL.. :)
O... Cheap shot! ;-)
>Robbie
>(who wonders how many people deleted this message in fear when they
>saw the Subject: line..)
We... the subject didn't contain "Good Times"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Eck) writes:
> I remember reading about this several months ago. It was the opinion
> of most people at the time to be just a joke. Anyone know for sure
> if it is anything other than a joke?
Well, I'd like to see the code for the infinite loop that'd melt down
my process
> I remember reading about this several months ago. It was the opinion
> of most people at the time to be just a joke. Anyone know for sure
> if it is anything other than a joke?
Not true. You can't get a virus from reading an email message.
Notice that the original post came from AOL.. :)
Rob
I called the number listed in this message it this is a joke!
The statement about the tight loop that could damage your processor
should be a dead give-away!
Check these things out in the future before spreading them!
Thanks,
Brian
,---
I don't think you have anything to worry about. You just fell victim
to one of the most perpetuated practical jokes on the internet. :))
-Josh Stockwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Gentlefolk:
The ``Good Times'' virus is a hoax, an urban legend. To quote from
the CERT Coordination Center memo on the subject:
> The "Good Times" virus warnings are a hoax. People are circulating
> the warnings without verifying the information contai
- Received message begins Here -
(urban legend hoax deleted)
Oh, god, it's back!
Jim Lynch, Sales Analyst, SGI/Cray Research, Inc. / ARS: K4GVO
Southeast District, Phone: (770) 631-2254, Email: [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, 16 Aug 1996, L. S. Colby wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I recently received the following email that is of interest to the
> debian community and others.
>
>
>
> L. S. Colby
>
I always try to pay attention to this kind o fstuff, because
I'm paranoid. But this is a hoax. I recieved a warning
e
No no no !
Not again.
Please read "http://www.singnet.com.sg/public/Virus/good-times.html";.;
This is a scam !
Phil.
I remember reading about this several months ago. It was the opinion
of most people at the time to be just a joke. Anyone know for sure
if it is anything other than a joke?
Terry
_
Terry Eck [EMAIL PROTECT
Cameron)
>Subject: Virus Alert
>Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:57:26 -0400
>
>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 23:26:49 -0400
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>>[EMAIL PRO
61 matches
Mail list logo
