also sprach Kevin Ross (on Wed, 09 May 2001 02:00:03AM -0700):
> 1. You can launch sslwrap from inetd, rather than running as a
> daemon. This is what I do, and have never had a problem with it.
> However, if you have a heavy load on pop3, this might not be a great
> option.
that's one idea. i'll
also sprach Alvin Oga (on Tue, 08 May 2001 10:05:56PM -0700):
> question still standsdid you compile sslwrap on the
> server you are using it on that is also your pop3 server
> that you're wrapping its services ??
yes. this has nothing to do with it though. think about it! do you
know how sslw
hi Mad
question still standsdid you compile sslwrap on the
server you are using it on that is also your pop3 server
that you're wrapping its services ??
- random crashes sometimes could be incompatibilities
between the binaries you run out-of-the-box and
the upgraded/out-dated machine
-
also sprach Alvin Oga (on Tue, 08 May 2001 08:38:10PM -0700):
> dont know why your sslwrap would die
well thanks for the reply then...
>did you compile sslwrap and ipop3d on a compatible box
>with the same versions of libs that is running on the
>secure pop3 server ??
do you know
4 matches
Mail list logo
