on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 02:40:31PM +0200, MaD dUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> also sprach Adri (on Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:31:34PM +0200):
> > Any similar utility under Debian?
>
> nope, and that's why debian is so good.
Wrong:
$ apt-cache show linuxconf
Package: linuxconf
Priority: o
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:24:01PM +0200, christophe barb? wrote:
> I know that a replacment is in the way but I can't remember its name (IIRC
> it's in sid).
I believe that would be deity.
--
That's not gibberish... It's Linux. - Byers, The Lone Gunmen
Geek Code 3.12: GCS d? s+: a C++ UL$
> how stable is gnome-apt these days?
Under potato it's very stable. ;-)
Under unstable, I use it only as a apt-get database displayer.
Sometimes it shows strange things (notably with virtual packages).
I don't know the current status of stormpkg but they are both very similar.
I know that a
christophe barbé wrote:
>
> If you don't like too much dselect, try under X gnome-apt.
>
how stable is gnome-apt these days?
how about storm-package (is that the right name)?
later,
Andy
If you don't like too much dselect, try under X gnome-apt.
Christophe
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:48:03 Adri wrote:
> Martin,
>
> At 14.40 15/06/2001 +0200, you wrote:
> >also sprach Adri (on Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:31:34PM +0200):
> > > Any similar utility under Debian?
> >
> >nope, and that's why debia
Martin,
At 14.40 15/06/2001 +0200, you wrote:
also sprach Adri (on Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:31:34PM +0200):
> Any similar utility under Debian?
nope, and that's why debian is so good. if you need those utilities,
get redhat or suse or progeny! those gui utils have inherent problems
on systems like l
also sprach Adri (on Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:31:34PM +0200):
> Any similar utility under Debian?
nope, and that's why debian is so good. if you need those utilities,
get redhat or suse or progeny! those gui utils have inherent problems
on systems like linux where config files may be edited by hand too
7 matches
Mail list logo
